Puzzle Quest 2 is a match-three game that asks you to think like a role-player. Infinite Interactive built it on a familiar board of colored gems, then hung combat, loot and a fantasy campaign on top. D3 Publisher released it on June 22, 2010, for the Nintendo DS, Xbox Live Arcade, iOS, Android, Windows Phone 7 and Microsoft Windows. It is the sequel to Puzzle Quest: Challenge of the Warlords, and it keeps the series’ bargain: swap gems, build mana, cast spells, win fights.
The board is the battle
The core of Puzzle Quest 2 is a competitive, Bejeweled-style “match three game” playfield. You and an opponent take turns on the same grid. Line up three or more gems and you collect the matching resource. Mana feeds spells. Skulls deal damage. The board is not a backdrop to combat. It is combat.
That single decision is what separates Puzzle Quest 2 from the pile of match-three games that followed it. Every swap is a move in a fight, and every fight is a small puzzle with a clock on it. The game layers role-playing and strategy onto that frame, and the two halves hold together because neither one is decoration.
The turn-based structure keeps it honest. You can see the board, plan a chain, and still watch the opponent answer with a run you did not see. The tension is real, and it comes from the same place it always did: you versus the grid.
It uses a competitive, Bejeweled-style, “match three game” playfield to simulate combat and other activities common to role-playing games.
A sequel that knows what it is
Puzzle Quest 2 is not trying to reinvent the formula that made Challenge of the Warlords a hit. It is trying to sharpen it. The sequel keeps the fantasy theme, the single-player and multiplayer modes, and the bird’s-eye isometric view that lets you read the whole board at once.
The platform list is the other story here. The source’s platform field also names Linux, PC and Xbox 360, but the release sentence covers six: Nintendo DS, Xbox Live Arcade, iOS, Android, Windows Phone 7 and Microsoft Windows. That is a wide net for a 2010 release, and it says something about how confident the studio was in the core loop. A game that plays this cleanly on a phone and on a console is a game built around a mechanic, not around a platform.
One version never made it. A PlayStation Portable release was in development but was cancelled due to sound bugs. That is a small footnote, but it is worth naming. The handheld was a natural home for a game like this, and the fact that audio problems killed it is a reminder that shipping across six platforms is not the same as shipping across seven.
Where the seams show
The game’s weaknesses are the weaknesses of its genre. A match-three board can only surprise you so many times. Once you have learned to read the grid, the difficulty curve flattens, and the role-playing systems do more work than the puzzles do. The fantasy wrapping is functional rather than memorable. You are here for the board, and the board knows it.
Multiplayer helps. Two players on the same board turn a solo puzzle into a duel, and the mode gives the game a second life after the campaign runs dry. It is not the reason to buy Puzzle Quest 2, but it is the reason to keep it installed.
The isometric view is a smart choice for the same reason. You need to see the whole field to plan a chain, and the game gives you that without fuss. Nothing about the presentation gets in the way of the decision you are about to make. In a puzzle game, that is a compliment.
The score
Puzzle Quest 2 earns an 8.1 out of 10. That matches the published critical aggregate across eight outlets, and it feels right. This is a sequel that understood its own engine and did not overreach. It took a proven idea, cleaned it up, and put it on every platform it could reach.
The cancelled PlayStation Portable version is the one loose thread. Everything else about Puzzle Quest 2 is a studio executing a known design with care. The match-three combat still works, the role-playing layer still gives it weight, and the multiplayer still gives it legs. If you missed it in 2010, the board has not aged badly. If you played it then, you already know why it stuck.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
