WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
About
CLAY TRIBUNE.
ShopCartAccount
Advertisement

The Orville Asks for the Stars but Hits Slapstick Instead: 3.6/10

A space comedy born of nostalgia, yet failing to land its punches. A captain, a crew, and a galaxy worth saving, but seldom cared for.

By mitch·4 min read
A captain stands amid a crew on a broken ship, a galaxy awaiting salvation they cannot fully muster.

“The Orville” is a space comedy built on nostalgia, and it mostly fails to land. The show borrows heavily from “Star Trek,” but it misses the sharpness of its predecessor. Instead, it settles for broad jokes and a thin moral center. This is a show about a spaceship crew trying to save the galaxy, but it rarely makes you care about the people doing the saving.

Trailer, via Rotten Tomatoes TV.

The Setup

“The Orville” follows Ed Mercer (Seth MacFarlane), a captain who was promoted over his head. He leads a crew of misfits on the U.S.S. Orville, a ship that is constantly falling apart. The show is set in the future, but it feels like a sitcom dressed in spacesuits.

Advertisement

MacFarlane plays the lead with a mix of charm and incompetence. He is likable, but his character is often too dim to be believable. The supporting cast includes Michael Ian Black as a hyper-efficient alien named Gordon Malloy, and Parker Posey as the ship’s doctor. Their chemistry is decent, but it is buried under layers of predictable dialogue.

The Space Comedy Formula

The show follows a simple pattern. Something breaks on the ship. The crew argues. Someone makes a joke. The problem gets fixed. The formula worked for “Star Trek,” but “The Orville” lacks the wit to make it fresh.

The humor leans on physical comedy and slapstick, which feels out of place in a show that wants to be smart. There are also frequent references to Earth culture, which can feel dated quickly. The show is trying to be funny, but it often comes across as lazy.

The Science Problem and Political Message

One of the biggest issues with “The Orville” is its handling of science. The show frequently contradicts itself within the same episode. One moment the crew is using advanced technology, and the next they are struggling with basic repairs. This inconsistency undermines the world-building that “Star Trek” established.

The show also has trouble with its aliens. Many of them are thinly drawn, existing only to serve a punchline. Some episodes introduce new species that are barely explored. The result is a universe that feels shallow, even after multiple seasons.

The show attempts to tackle political issues, but it does so in a heavy-handed way. Episodes deal with war, prejudice, and corruption, but the messages are delivered through obvious lectures rather than subtle storytelling. The show seems more interested in preaching than in exploring complex ideas. The moralizing reaches a peak in the final season, where the stakes become absurdly large. The show tries to end on a grand note, but the execution falls flat. The finale feels rushed and unsatisfying, leaving viewers wanting more closure than they get.

The Technical Side

On a technical level, “The Orville” is well-made. The special effects are competent, and the sets look expensive. However, the pacing is slow, and some episodes drag. The show runs long, which means it often loses momentum.

The music is forgettable, and the score rarely adds anything to the scenes. The editing is occasionally choppy, which disrupts the flow of action sequences. These are small issues, but they add up over the course of a season.

What Works

Not everything fails. There are moments where “The Orville” shows flashes of genuine creativity. Some standalone episodes, particularly those focused on smaller character stories, are stronger than the main plotlines. The show also benefits from guest stars who bring energy to the proceedings.

The relationships between characters are occasionally rewarding. Ed’s interactions with his crew members are often the highlight of an episode, even when the plot is weak. The show’s best episodes are the ones that slow down and let the actors breathe.

The Legacy

“The Orville” was canceled after three seasons. That decision was likely based on ratings, but it also reflects the show’s inability to find a consistent audience. The series never quite found its footing, and its cancellation was probably inevitable.

The show’s influence is limited. It has not spawned spinoffs or cultural phenomena, unlike “Star Trek.” It remains a footnote in the history of science fiction television.

Final Score

“The Orville” is a show that aims high but rarely hits its mark. It has moments of genuine entertainment, but they are few and far between. The show is ultimately a disappointment, weighed down by its own ambitions.

Key Facts

  • Show: The Orville
  • Network: Fox
  • Seasons: 3
  • Premiere: September 26, 2017
  • Critical Score: 3.6/10

The Good and Bad

  1. Strongest element: Character-driven standalone episodes
  2. Weakest element: Heavy-handed political messaging
  3. Most memorable aspect: Guest star performances
  4. Least effective aspect: Inconsistent scientific logic

“The Orville” is a show that fans of space comedies will enjoy in small doses. It has its moments, but it is not a recommendation for anyone looking for a deep dive into the genre. The final verdict is that “The Orville” is a flawed experiment that never quite finds its purpose.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

TV reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.