Tomorrowland is a movie about hope, and it spends nearly two hours proving that hope is not enough. Brad Bird’s Disney sci-fi adventure wants to be a message of optimism in a cynical age. What it delivers is a hollow shell of a story, wrapped in a shiny visual package that can’t save it from being a forgettable failure.
The plot follows Casey Newton (Britt Robertson), a bright, curious teenager who stumbles upon a mysterious pin that leads her to Tomorrowland, a hidden utopian city of technology and imagination. There she meets Frank Walker (George Clooney), a once-promising inventor now a washed-up cynic. Together they must find a way to save the world from disaster while also trying to restore the magic of Tomorrowland itself, which is slowly fading away.
It sounds like a promising setup. The problem is that the setup is far better than the execution. The film’s central idea—that a lost paradise of innovation and wonder exists somewhere—and its villain, a corporate entity that suppresses creativity in favor of efficiency—have potential. But the script never gives either of them room to breathe.
Trailer, via Disney.
The Pin That Opens the Story
Casey’s discovery of the pin is the engine of the film. It’s a simple object that opens a portal to Tomorrowland, and it carries a weight of history and meaning. In theory, it should be the film’s emotional core. Instead, it becomes a McGuffin, a device that moves the plot forward without ever being explained or made to matter.
The pin is a mystery that never resolves. We learn that it belongs to a secret society, but we never learn why. We learn that it connects to Tomorrowland, but we never learn how. The film trusts the audience to accept the pin’s existence and move on, and that trust is misplaced. Without a clear understanding of what the pin represents, the entire premise loses its anchor.
George Clooney’s Cynical Inventor
Frank Walker is meant to be the heart of the film. He’s a man who believed in the future and lost faith in it, and his journey back to optimism is supposed to be the emotional spine of the story. Clooney brings a weary, charismatic presence to the role, and there are moments where the performance lands. But the character himself is underwritten.
His cynicism is never fully explored. We’re told he gave up on the future, but we’re never shown why. The film gestures toward a past failure, but it doesn’t commit to showing what that failure was. This leaves Frank as a hollow vessel for the film’s message rather than a three-dimensional human being.
Clooney’s best scenes come when he’s playing off Robertson. Their chemistry is genuine, and the scenes where they bicker and bond over their shared sense of wonder are the most alive parts of the film. But even those moments feel like a reprieve from a larger structure that doesn’t know what to do with them.
Britt Robertson’s Lost Wonder
Robertson plays Casey as a girl who has lost her sense of wonder. She’s smart, curious, and frustrated by the world around her, which is constantly telling her that her dreams are impractical. Her arc is meant to parallel Frank’s, with both characters finding each other and rediscovering the joy of creation. On paper, it’s a classic coming-of-age structure.
In practice, it doesn’t work. Casey’s loss of wonder is never properly established. We see her frustration, but we don’t see what caused it. The film assumes that a generic sense of disillusionment is enough to drive her actions, and it isn’t. As a result, her character feels thin and reactive.
The film also leans heavily on her relationship with her father, played by Hugh Laurie. Their scenes together are meant to be tender and sad, but they fall flat. Laurie’s performance is competent, but the material is weak. His character is a broken man who gave up on the future, and the film doesn’t give him the space to make that betrayal feel earned.
Tomorrowland as a Dying Paradise
Tomorrowland itself is the film’s biggest missed opportunity. It’s described as a city of wonders, a place where imagination and technology have created a perfect society. The film shows glimpses of its beauty, but it never lets us linger. We see the architecture, the inventions, and the people, but we never get a sense of what life there is actually like.
The film’s message is that Tomorrowland is dying because people stopped believing in it. That’s a powerful idea. But the film never shows us what belief looks like. It tells us that belief is necessary, but it doesn’t show us how to believe. The result is a hollow promise of a better world that we’re never allowed to inhabit.
“We live in a world of miracles. And yet, we choose to live in fear.”
That line, spoken by Clooney’s Frank, is the closest the film comes to nailing its thesis. It’s a simple statement, but it captures the film’s tension between wonder and dread. Unfortunately, the film spends more time showing explosions and action sequences than it does exploring that tension.
The Villain That Never Comes Alive
The film’s antagonist is a shadowy corporation that seeks to control the future by stamping out imagination. It’s a neat metaphor for the forces that crush individuality in the name of efficiency. But the corporation remains a shadow throughout the film. We see its agents, but we never understand its goals beyond a vague desire to control everything.
The film’s final act is a chase sequence that is meant to be tense. It involves a robot army and a final confrontation. But the stakes are never clear. We’re told the world is in danger, but we’re never shown what the danger is. The climax is a series of explosions and set pieces, but it doesn’t earn any of them.
The World Around Them
The film’s vision of the present day is a dystopia of conformity and fear. It’s a world where people are afraid of the future, and that fear has calcified into a society that punishes creativity. The film’s critique of corporate control is valid, but it’s never rendered with specificity. We see the oppression, but we don’t see how it works.
The film’s setting is a futuristic version of New York City, but it’s a city that feels empty. The streets are clean, but they’re also lifeless. The film tries to make this world feel oppressive, but it fails because the oppression is never made concrete. We’re told people are oppressed, but we’re never shown how.
The Soundtrack That Carries the Weight
The film’s score, composed by Michael Giacchino, is one of its few strengths. Giacchino knows how to write music that makes you feel uplifted, and the score does a lot of heavy lifting in the film’s quieter moments. It’s the emotional backbone of the film, and it’s a shame the script can’t match it.
There are also some strong performances from the supporting cast. Keegan-Michael Key plays a character named David Nix, and his scenes are genuinely funny. Judy Greer plays Casey’s mother, and she brings warmth to a role that could have been a stereotype. But neither of them gets enough screen time to leave a mark.
The Comparison Table
| Element | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|
| Pin | Mysterious anchor | Never explained |
| Frank Walker | Charismatic lead | Underdeveloped backstory |
| Casey Newton | Genuine chemistry with Clooney | Thin character arc |
| Tomorrowland | Beautiful concept | Never fully realized |
| Villain | Valid metaphor | Shallow portrayal |
| Setting | Futuristic dystopia | Empty and lifeless |
Final Word
Tomorrowland is a film that wants to be inspiring, but it fails to deliver inspiration. It’s a movie that understands the power of imagination, but it doesn’t understand how to harness that power. The result is a film that feels like a missed opportunity.
The film’s technical elements—the visuals, the score, the occasional performance—are all competent. But competence is not enough to carry a story that refuses to commit to its own ideas. The film is a hollow promise, a pin that opens a door to a world we’re never allowed to enter.
The film’s final scene is meant to be uplifting. It shows Casey and Frank walking into Tomorrowland, ready to rebuild it. But the scene feels hollow, because the film has spent two hours telling us that rebuilding is easy without showing us the cost of that rebuilding.
Tomorrowland is a failure, but it’s a failure that’s easy to watch. The visuals are beautiful, the music is stirring, and the performances are often engaging. It’s a film that will entertain you without leaving a lasting impression. It’s a film that will make you feel something, but it won’t make you think.
The film’s message is simple: believe in the future. That’s a message that deserves a better vehicle. Tomorrowland is not that vehicle.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
