WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
About
CLAY TRIBUNE.
ShopCartAccount
Advertisement

Jason Bourne Review: Matt Damon Carries a Competent, But Forgettable, Retread

A weary hero returns to the field, seeking memory and identity amid Berlin streets and Roman shadows.

By mitch·4 min read
A man stands alone upon a rain-swept street, shadowed by the city lights behind him.

Jason Bourne returns in 2016 with a film that wants to feel new while leaning heavily on what came before. The result is a mixed bag of action, politics and identity crisis, with moments of genuine tension undercut by a script that can’t quite shake its own history.

The film picks up after the events of The Bourne Ultimatum, with Jason Bourne (Matt Damon) living off the grid and trying to understand who he is. A CIA operation gone wrong forces him back into the field, and the hunt for answers leads him through Berlin, Rome and Washington, D.C.

Trailer, via Universal Pictures.

Advertisement

Matt Damon Carries the Weight

Damon remains the anchor of the franchise. He plays Bourne with a weary intensity that suggests a man who has spent years running from himself and now can’t even trust his own memories. The performance is solid, but it’s also limited by a script that keeps circling the same themes without giving them new shape.

Julia Stiles returns as Nicky Parsons, the tech expert who helps Bourne navigate the digital trail left by the CIA. Her scenes add a layer of moral complexity to the story, but her character feels like a leftover from earlier films rather than a fully realized addition. She provides the technical expertise that allows Bourne to track down the people behind the CIA’s misuse of data, and her presence gives the film a human connection to the digital angle.

The Action Works, Mostly

The action sequences are the film’s strongest asset. A car chase through Berlin is a highlight, with Bourne driving aggressively and taking risks that make the audience lean forward. The fight scenes are brutal and fast, with Damon doing most of the work himself rather than relying on stunt doubles.

But the action isn’t always matched by the pacing around it. Some scenes drag, particularly the early stretches in Berlin, where the film spends too much time establishing the CIA’s mistakes and not enough time putting Bourne in immediate danger.

The Digital Spy Plot

The film’s central plot involves the CIA’s misuse of data and surveillance technology. Bourne learns that his own files were accessed by agents who used his skills for their own gain. This raises questions about privacy and government power, but the film treats them as background noise rather than the core of its story.

The digital angle is timely, but it’s also thin. The film doesn’t spend enough time exploring the implications of its own premise, and the villains are mostly faceless bureaucrats rather than memorable threats. The CIA’s abuse of its own systems is the engine that drives the story, but the film never digs deep enough into what that means for the characters caught in it.

Where the Film Falls Short

The biggest problem is the lack of a fresh perspective. Jason Bourne feels like a retread of the previous films, with the same structure, the same tone and the same stakes. There’s no attempt to reinvent the wheel, and that shows in nearly every scene.

The dialogue is often clunky, with characters explaining things to each other that they already know. The romance subplot with Rachel Weisz’s Marie stops short of being developed, and her role is reduced to a token love interest rather than a full partner in the action. Her scenes are few, and she rarely gets a chance to contribute to the plot beyond serving as a point of emotional connection for Bourne.

The Final Stretch

The film builds toward a confrontation with the CIA director, played by Tommy Lee Jones. That scene has some tension, but it’s undermined by a resolution that feels rushed and unsatisfying. The film ends with Bourne disappearing again, leaving the door open for more adventures, but the ending feels hollow rather than earned.

The final chase through Washington, D.C., is the best sequence in the film. It brings together the car chases, the fights and the digital espionage in a way that finally makes the plot cohere. It’s a strong finish to an otherwise uneven movie.

The Verdict

Jason Bourne is a competent entry in the series, but it’s not a great one. It delivers thrills and a few smart ideas, but it fails to break new ground or deepen the mythology it inherited. The film is watchable and occasionally exciting, but it’s also forgettable.

  • Director: Paul Greengrass
  • Lead: Matt Damon as Jason Bourne
  • Supporting cast: Julia Stiles, Tommy Lee Jones, Rachel Weisz
  • Running time: 123 minutes
  • Release year: 2016

The film is currently available for streaming on major platforms. It’s worth a watch for fans of the series, but newcomers might want to start with the earlier entries first. The action holds up, but the story doesn’t justify returning to the well.

5.8 of 10.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.