“Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore” wants to be the middle chapter of a trilogy. It spends two hours trying to get there. The result is a film that moves fast enough to keep you from falling asleep, but never fast enough to land.
The movie picks up where the last one left off, with Albus Dumbledore (Jude Law) rallying a group of wizards to stop Grindelwald (Mads Mikkelsen) from taking over the world. That sounds like a plan. It plays out less like one.
Trailer, via Warner Bros..
Jude Law and Mikkelsen Carry the Weight
Law carries the film. His Dumbledore is weary, smart, and haunted, a man who knows the war he’s fighting will cost him everything. Mikkelsen’s Grindelwald is a real threat, not a cartoon villain. Their scenes together are the best in the movie, a chess match between two men who once trusted each other completely and now see each other as monsters.
The supporting cast is thinner. Ezra Miller’s Credence Barebone shows up again, and his arc remains a mystery wrapped in confusion. Katherine Waterston’s Tina and Dan Fogler’s Jacob barely get a chance to breathe. They’re sidekicks to a plot that doesn’t know what to do with them.
A Plot That Runs In Circles
The story tries to juggle too many things at once. There’s the main plot about Grindelwald’s army. There’s a side plot about a hidden magical community. There’s a subplot about Dumbledore’s past. None of it connects cleanly. The film spends long stretches explaining things we didn’t need to know, then rushes through the action that might have made them matter.
The pacing is uneven. Some scenes drag while others feel rushed. The film never finds a steady rhythm. It feels like a director trying to fit three movies into one.
New Creatures, Little Impact
The titular fantastic beasts are meant to be the selling point. The film introduces a new creature, the niffler, and it’s cute. But it doesn’t change the film’s direction. The creatures are pretty to look at, but they don’t move the story forward.
The film also introduces a new character, Leta Lestrange, played by Claudia Kim. She brings some emotional weight to the proceedings. But her arc is underdeveloped. We learn she’s in love with a man we barely meet, and that’s about it.
Visual Style and Its Limits
The film looks good. Director David Yates builds grand set pieces and keeps the wizarding world feeling lived-in. But the visual style can’t save the script. The film is bright, colorful, and full of spectacle. It’s also often hard to follow.
The film also leans heavily on practical effects, which is a good call. But the CGI-heavy moments, especially those involving Grindelwald’s spells, feel dated. They look like effects from a decade ago, not a fresh entry in a beloved franchise.
Where It Lands
“Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore” isn’t a bad movie. It’s a dull one. It’s a film that knows what it wants to say but can’t find the right way to say it. The performances are strong, the visuals are competent, and the ideas are interesting. None of it adds up to a satisfying whole.
The film ends with a cliffhanger that feels obligatory rather than earned. It sets up a final confrontation without giving us a reason to care about the outcome. It’s a tease, not a payoff.
Key Facts Box
– Title: Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore
– Director: David Yates
– Runtime: 133 minutes
– Score: 4.7/10
The film is ambitious. It fails to deliver on that ambition. It’s a step down from the films that came before it, and it leaves audiences wanting something better.
The score is 4.7/10.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
