WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
About
CLAY TRIBUNE.
ShopCartAccount
Advertisement

‘Penguins of Madagascar’ Pads Its Plot With Cameos and Jokes

A review of Penguins of Madagascar, a sequel padded with cameos and a thin plot that sells toys more than it entertains.

By mitch·4 min read
Four penguins dressed as spies stand on a snowy hill overlooking a city.

“Penguins of Madagascar” is a movie about four penguins who want to be spies. That is the whole premise, and it is thin enough that the film spends most of its runtime trying to pad itself out with cameos and side plots. The result is a sequel that feels less like a story and more like a marketing tool for the franchise’s toy line.

The film picks up after the events of the previous movie. Skipper, Kowalski, Rico, and Private — the titular Penguins of Madagascar — are still part of the Central Park Zoo’s security team, but they are restless. They dream of being real agents, not just animals who clean up messes. When they learn of a plot involving a villain named Dave, they finally get their chance to step outside the zoo and become actual spies.

Trailer, via Universal Kids.

Advertisement

The Plot

The villain, Dave, is a lemur voiced by Benedict Cumberbatch. He is a British-accented animal who wants revenge on humanity for destroying his island. His plan involves a machine that can create a giant snowstorm, and the penguins decide that stopping him is their destiny. Along the way, they recruit a cast of other characters from the franchise, including Marlene the otter and a polar bear named King Julien.

The problem is that the plot is not really a plot. It is a series of set pieces strung together without much logic. Dave’s motivation is never explained beyond a vague desire for vengeance. The machine he builds is a McGuffin that exists only to drive the action forward. There is no real tension, no sense of stakes, and no payoff that feels earned.

The Cameos

The film is at its best when it is simply showing off the world of Madagascar. There are cameos from other animals, and some of these sequences are genuinely funny. A scene involving a group of birds is particularly strong, with the penguins getting into a fight that is chaotic and silly in a way that the main plot never manages.

But the cameos are also the film’s biggest weakness. They break up the story into fragments, and the pacing suffers as a result. The movie keeps introducing new characters and new locations, but it never takes the time to let any of them land. By the time the credits roll, you will remember the jokes more than the story.

The Animation

The animation is bright and colorful, and the character designs are expressive. The penguins themselves are cute, and their movements are fluid. The film looks good, and there are moments where the visual gags are clever enough to overcome the weak writing.

However, the technical quality is not enough to save the film. The voice acting is competent, with Bryan Cranston doing a good job as Skipper and Owen Wilson bringing his usual energy to Kowalski. But the dialogue is thin, and the actors are left performing lines that are not particularly interesting.

The Running Order

Part Event
Opening The penguins discover a secret map
Middle The penguins meet Marlene and Julien
Climax The battle against Dave’s machine
Ending The credits roll

The film follows a standard three-act structure, but the acts are poorly paced. The middle section drags, and the climax feels rushed. The ending wraps things up quickly, leaving the audience with a sense of relief rather than satisfaction.

The Final Verdict

“Penguins of Madagascar” is a movie that is better than it should be, but only because it occasionally lets its characters have fun. The penguins are charming, and the film has a few genuine laughs. But the overall experience is marred by a plot that is too thin to sustain itself.

The film is a sequel that feels like it was made to sell toys, not to entertain audiences. The cameos are fun, but they are also distracting. The jokes are frequent, but they are rarely memorable. And the villain is a one-note character who is more annoying than threatening.

The movie is not terrible. It is not a waste of time either. It is just a forgettable entry in a franchise that has already proven it can do better. The film earns a score of 5.3 out of 10.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.