The Environmental Protection Agency is doing away with the final national restrictions on greenhouse gas pollution from power plants in the United States. This decision comes at a moment when artificial intelligence, electric vehicles, and a return to making goods domestically are pushing electricity use ever higher, which means the change will simply make the nation’s power supply more harmful to the environment.
Today, the agency revealed its intent to get rid of all remaining rules on power plant emissions. This proposal marks a significant step up in President Donald Trump’s campaign to support fossil fuels, alongside making it simpler to construct energy-intensive data centers.
The Proposal at a Glance
The agency is wrapping up its move to undo the prior administration’s greenhouse gas rules for power plants. It has also put forward a plan to take away any leftover caps on that kind of climate pollution from the power sector.
The agency claims the finalized rule would save $310 billion while the additional proposed actions would shave off $370 million “in direct compliance costs.” The EPA argues that greenhouse gas pollution is “out of its scope to regulate” because its impacts are “global in nature, and any potential public health harms are too uncertain, conjectural, remote, and convoluted to tie specifically to the U.S. power sector.”
The Climate Context
Electricity generation accounts for one quarter of the country’s greenhouse gas output, trailing only transportation. The administration took action on vehicles in February, undoing the “endangerment finding,” which established that greenhouse gases “threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations” and gave the agency authority to oversee that pollution through the Clean Air Act. The EPA is now broadening that reversal to cover power plants.
A shared scientific view holds that greenhouse gas pollution from fossil fuels brings about climate change. In terms of total emissions throughout its history, no nation has produced more greenhouse gas pollution than the US. Even now, after China, the US remains among the leading carbon emitters.
Who Is Pushing Back
Environmental and consumer advocates are fighting back. They argue that Trump’s deregulation spree comes with higher costs for the environment, public health, and Americans’ pocketbooks.
Dominique Browning, who founded and leads Moms Clean Air Force alongside others, made her remarks in an email to reporters. She stated: “Failure to limit climate pollution means more children ending up in the emergency room with asthma attacks and heatstroke, more families struggling to rebuild homes after harrowing storms. It means higher health care bills, higher insurance costs, and more economic struggle at a time when Americans cannot afford it.”
The Cost of Deregulation
Rising demand has pushed electricity costs up in the US for the first time in over a decade. Factories, data centers, and electric vehicles are all drawing more power from the nation’s grids.
For 45 days, the public will have an opportunity to weigh in on the EPA’s proposed changes before they move forward. Given how far-reaching these proposals are, it is almost certain that they will attract a significant number of legal challenges.
What Comes Next
Holly Bender, chief program officer at the Sierra Club, has made it clear the organization is ready for a confrontation. She said in an emailed press statement: “The Sierra Club will fight back against this reckless and dangerous proposal with everything we have in the courts, in Congress, and in communities across the country. While wildfires rage, floods devastate communities, and families struggle to afford skyrocketing electricity bills and insurance premiums, the Trump administration is handing the fossil fuel industry a license to keep polluting.”
Key Facts Box
- The EPA is repealing Biden-era greenhouse gas requirements for power plants
- Proposed actions would save $310 billion (finalized rule) and $370 million (proposed)
- Public comment period: 45 days
- Power sector: a quarter of US greenhouse gas emissions
- US is still a leading carbon emitter after China
What Advocates Are Fighting
- Higher health care bills
- Higher insurance costs
- More economic struggle
- More children ending up in the emergency room with asthma attacks and heatstroke
- More families struggling to rebuild homes after harrowing storms
After more than a decade without growth, demand for electricity is now rising, and it is at this moment that the EPA is handing fossil fuel companies a free pass on the pollution that caused the problem in the first place.
The EPA’s own argument that pollution is “too uncertain” to regulate rings hollow against the facts. Greenhouse gas pollution from fossil fuels causes climate change. That is not conjecture. It is settled science.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.