Donald Trump has decided that José de Rivera’s “Infinity” — the stainless steel Möbius strip that has rotated outside the National Museum of American History since 1967 — is not doing enough work. In a Truth Social post on Friday, September 11, the president called on the Smithsonian Institution to replace the sculpture with a 30-foot-tall statue of George Washington.
The president wants the giant statue to stand where “Infinity” currently sits, facing the National Mall. He also wants a five-year exhibition on “America’s Greatest Hero,” timed to Washington’s 300th birthday in 2032. Trump made the demand in a post titled “Truth About the Smithsonian,” which criticized the institution’s “ideological activism.”
The Post’s Opening Move
Trump began his post by calling for a simpler gesture. He asked the Smithsonian to display an existing 11-foot-tall statue of Washington outside the museum’s Flag Hall for a dedicated Constitution Day celebration on Thursday, September 17. Then he pivoted to the swap itself.
He described the sculpture as a “strange modernist sculpture” that “tells visitors nothing about America, inspires no one, and honors none of our Great American Heroes.” The work rotates on its axis every eight minutes.
The 2032 Angle
Trump framed the statue as part of a broader project tied to Washington’s 300th birthday, which falls in 2032. He said the exhibition would be “urgently produced” in anticipation of that date.
The president also claimed that the NMAH had “failed to give George Washington and our other Founding Fathers the celebration they deserve” in its America 250 programming. That reference pointed to Secretary Lonnie Bunch III’s retirement announcement, which marked the end of the Smithsonian’s “recently ended” leadership.
Trump also targeted the museum’s now-defunct Center for Restorative History and its Decolonization Working Group, saying they focused attention overwhelmingly on those who had been oppressed.
What the Sculpture Actually Is
“Infinity” was the United States government’s first abstract art commission. It has stood outside the NMAH entrance for nearly 60 years. De Rivera created the kinetic sculpture in 1967.
The sculpture’s form is a Möbius strip, a surface with only one side and one edge. It rotates continuously on its axis, completing a full rotation every eight minutes. The work is made of stainless steel.
Comparing the Two Proposals
| Proposal | Size | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| 11-foot Washington statue | Short-term display | Constitution Day, September 17 |
| 30-foot Washington statue | Permanent replacement | Exhibition in 2032 |
The smaller statue would move quickly. The larger one would become permanent.
The Reaction So Far
The post has drawn attention from observers who note this as another instance of Trump’s war on public art. The president has cited patriotism or historical accuracy as his justification for past actions.
No further response has been reported from the Smithsonian.
What This Means for the Sculpture
“Infinity” has been a fixture of the National Mall for decades. It is one of the few abstract works in a landscape dominated by monuments to presidents and wars.
Trump’s demand is not unprecedented. He has made similar proposals during his presidency, arguing that modernist works fail to represent American values.
The irony is that “Infinity” is precisely the kind of work Trump has said he wants to remove. It is abstract, modernist, and it tells no obvious story about American history.
But the statue’s defenders have a strong argument: the work has stood for nearly six decades without complaint. Its removal would be a statement about what the administration considers worthy of public space.
Key Facts Box
- “Infinity” was installed in 1967
- It rotates every eight minutes
- The proposed statue is 30 feet tall
- Washington’s 300th birthday is in 2032
- Constitution Day is Thursday, September 17
The Verdict
Trump’s demand is senseless. It is also consistent.
The president has spent years removing modernist and abstract works from public spaces, often citing patriotism or historical accuracy as his justification. This is the same pattern: a national monument becomes a target, and the administration proposes a replacement that is bigger, more literal, and more obviously American.
The statue would be a blunt instrument. It would stand 30 feet tall, unlike the temporary display Trump proposed for Constitution Day.
The exhibition, meanwhile, is scheduled for 2032. The question is whether the relevant authorities will approve the change.
For now, “Infinity” remains in place. The sculpture has survived previous attacks, and it may survive this one too.
But the precedent is set. If the authorities approve the statue, it will send a message about what the administration considers worthy of public space. If it rejects the proposal, it will send a different message: that abstract art has a place on the National Mall, even if the president disagrees.
Either way, the debate is unlikely to end soon. Trump has made his position clear. The authorities will have to decide whether to honor it.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.