Ben Shelton made a simple choice before the 2026 US Open final against Alexander Zverev, and now tennis fans are asking if that choice cost him the title. He won the coin toss and elected to serve first. That might sound sensible — his serve is among the best on the ATP Tour — but some wonder if the decision made the difference.
The match began with Shelton serving first. Zverev broke him in the first game, including a Shelton double fault. Shelton trailed from the start and never recovered. Zverev settled in after that break and cruised to victory, though he did serve a shaky game to lose the fourth set.
Shelton’s Serve and the Coin Toss
Shelton’s serve is the weapon that carried him through the tournament. He beat Carlos Alcaraz in a five-set quarterfinal, and that performance earned him attention across the sport. In a normal match, serving first is an excellent decision because his serve is among the best on the ATP Tour.
But this was a Grand Slam final. Shelton had never reached this stage before. Nerves were bound to play a role, and serving first exposed him to pressure right away. Letting Zverev serve first might have been a better way to manage those early jitters.
Zverev’s Response
Zverev responded to the break by settling in. He relaxed and played with confidence, never looking back after that first-game break. His serve and shotmaking were stellar throughout the match, even when he served a shaky game in the fourth set.
The German has been in these situations before. He knows how to handle the big moments, and his performance showed that experience. Shelton, meanwhile, was playing his first Grand Slam final.
The Case Against the Decision
The argument against Shelton’s choice rests on a single point: he gave up the first serve in a match where the first game defined the outcome. Zverev broke him immediately, and Shelton never caught up.
A more experienced player might have let Zverev serve first to ease into the match. Zverev dealt with nerves too, but he has been through this before. Shelton was facing a completely new situation.
What Shelton Learned
Shelton will grow from this experience, just as many players have done before him. Zverev himself improved after his own early losses. When Shelton reaches another Grand Slam final, he will handle the coin toss and the early moments differently.
“Shelton will learn and improve, as many players have done before him, like Zverev.”
The decision to serve first was not the only factor in the match. But the question remains: would the result have been different if Shelton had let Zverev serve first?
The Match Record Tells Its Own Story
Zverev broke Shelton in the first game. Shelton trailed from the start and never caught up. Zverev’s serve and shotmaking were stellar throughout the entire match, even when he served a shaky game in the fourth set.
Shelton’s Path Forward
Shelton’s path to the final was remarkable. He beat Alcaraz in a five-set thriller and then pushed through to face Zverev. He will learn from this experience, as many players have done before him, like Zverev.
The lesson is simple: in a Grand Slam final, the first serve carries extra weight. Shelton will remember that the next time he stands at the coin toss.
The decision to serve first may have felt right at the moment, but the match record tells a different story. Zverev broke Shelton immediately, and the American never caught up. The question of whether that decision cost him the title is a fair one, but it is not the whole story.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.