Tom Cruise spends nearly half of Mission: Impossible III strapped to a chair while his wife is tortured. That single scene defines why this third entry in the series still holds up, even as the action around it strains to keep pace. The film is a marriage of two impulses: a character study about a man who has lost everything he cared about, and a spectacle machine that wants to blow things up. Mostly, the spectacle wins.
Cruise plays Ethan Hunt, now married to Julia, played by Michelle Monaghan. Their domestic life is shattered when she is kidnapped, forcing Hunt to re-enter the world of Impossible Missions Force. The setup is simple, but the execution is anything but. The film is a vehicle for Cruise’s brand of physicality, and it leans hard into it.
Trailer, via Paramount Movies.
Ethan Hunt’s Return
The film opens with Hunt settling into a quiet life. He has a wife, a dog, and a house. That peace is broken within minutes when his wife is taken. The stakes are immediate and personal, and the film knows it. What follows is a chase across several continents, a fight against a shadowy organization led by Philip Seymour Hoffman, and a final confrontation that changes everything.
The script, written by Robert Towne and Alex Kurtzman, and directed by John Woo, is at its best when it focuses on Hunt’s emotional journey. The kidnapping of his wife drives him to extremes, and the film tracks that descent with a grim determination. There is a coldness to how Hunt operates once he is pushed too far, and the film never lets you forget that this is a man who has lost his center.
Woo brings his signature style to the film, favoring long takes and slow-motion sequences. The action is kinetic and often beautiful, but it can also feel excessive. The film is not interested in subtlety. It wants you to see the explosions, the falls, and the stunts. It gets that across with clarity.
The Chase Across Continents
The middle stretch of Mission: Impossible III is where the film shows its age. The globe-trotting plot moves from Shanghai to Prague to Washington D.C., and each location offers a new set piece. The pacing is frantic, and the editing is fast, but the story underneath starts to fray. Characters are introduced and discarded without ceremony, and the villain, played by Hoffman, is less a threat than a target of opportunity.
The best set piece is the rooftop chase in Shanghai, where Hunt and his team scale buildings and leap between them. It is a sequence that demands attention, and it delivers. The practical effects hold up better than the digital ones, and the film is at its best when it trusts the stunt work over the visual effects.
The Stunts Carry the Weight
The film’s reputation rests on its stunts, and those moments are the reason to watch. Cruise does his own work, and the scenes where he hangs off helicopters, climbs walls, and falls through windows are genuinely thrilling. The action is not just about the punches thrown; it is about the physics of the fall, the timing of the leap, and the weight of the landing.
The film’s weakest moments come in the quieter stretches. The dialogue is often flat, and the supporting characters are thin. Ving Rhames returns as Luther, and he is given little to do beyond provide comic relief. The film is at its worst when it tries to be a drama, and it fails. The emotional beats land with a thud, and the film is better served by letting the action breathe.
Hoffman’s Villain
Hoffman is a presence in the film, and his scenes with Cruise are the closest the movie comes to genuine tension. His performance is measured, and he understands that less is often more. He is not a cartoon villain, but a man with a plan. The problem is that the plan is never fully explained, and the film ends before you understand what he wanted.
The film’s final act is rushed, and the resolution feels like a placeholder rather than a conclusion. The villain is defeated, the mission is completed, and the credits roll. There is no epilogue, no moment of reflection, and no sense of closure. It is a letdown after a film that spent so much time building its central conflict.
A Mixed Legacy
Mission: Impossible III is not a great film, but it is a functional one. It knows what it wants to be, and it mostly delivers on that promise. The action is exciting, the performances are solid, and the emotional core is present, even if it is buried under layers of spectacle. It is a film that rewards repeat viewings for its technical craft, but it does not reward patience for its storytelling.
The film’s influence can be seen in later entries in the series, where the balance between action and character has shifted. This film is the bridge between the older, more cerebral installments and the newer, more commercial ones. It is a transitional work, and it works as such.
1. Best Set Piece — The rooftop chase in Shanghai
2. Strongest Performance — Philip Seymour Hoffman as the villain
3. Weakest Element — The pacing and the editing in the middle stretch
4. Most Memorable Scene — Hunt hanging off a helicopter
5. Final Verdict — A mixed but entertaining entry in the franchise
Here is the breakdown of what works and what does not:
- The rooftop chase in Shanghai stands out as the film’s best set piece.
- Philip Seymour Hoffman delivers the strongest performance as the villain.
- The pacing and editing in the middle stretch are the film’s weakest elements.
- Hunt hanging off a helicopter is the most memorable scene.
- The final verdict is a mixed but entertaining entry in the franchise.
Key Facts Box
– Title: Mission: Impossible III
– Director: John Woo
– Writer: Robert Towne, Alex Kurtzman
– Lead actor: Tom Cruise
– Running time: 138 minutes
– Score: 6.6/10
Mission: Impossible III is a film that is best enjoyed on its own terms. It is not trying to be a masterpiece, and it does not pretend to be one. It is a summer blockbuster that delivers thrills, and it does that with a confidence that is hard to argue with. The emotional core is there, but it is buried under the noise. If you can accept that, you will find a film that is worth your time.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.





