Hugh Grant and Julia Roberts play a romance between a bookstore owner and a movie star in Notting Hill, and the film treats that mismatch with a light touch. Roberts plays Anna Scott, a major American actress who wanders into the shop of William Thacker, played by Grant. He sells books for a living. She sells movies for a living. They fall in love anyway.
The premise is simple enough that it could work. What holds the film back is a script that trusts the stars to carry the weight of the story instead of giving them one worth carrying.
Trailer, via UniversalMoviesINTL.
Grant’s Performance
Grant plays William Thacker as awkward, honest, and a little lost, and he commits fully to the character’s confusion. He is funny, sincere, and easy to root for. The film leans on his physical comedy and his timing to keep the middle sections moving, and Grant delivers both without strain.
Roberts plays Anna Scott with less range. Her performance is competent, but she plays her character as a version of herself rather than as a person caught between fame and love. The film asks her to feel genuine emotion about a relationship that has nothing to do with the pressures of being a celebrity, and she mostly settles for a smile and a shrug.
The Romance’s Limits
The central problem is that the film does not know what it wants the audience to think about the romance. Does it want us to believe that a famous person can truly love someone ordinary? Or does it want us to enjoy the fantasy of a famous person falling for an ordinary person? It drifts between the two without settling on either, and the confusion shows.
There is a scene where Anna walks through London with William, and the city stands in for everything the film cannot say about their relationship. It is beautiful, it is sad, and it is also empty of meaning. The film points at the scenery and hopes we will fill in the gaps with our own feelings.
Roberts’s Problematic Role
Anna Scott is a successful actress who makes movies for a living, and the film never fully understands what that means for her. It wants to make her relatable, but it keeps dressing her in designer clothes and showing her surrounded by assistants and adoring fans. The contradiction is not resolved, and it leaves the romance feeling hollow.
Grant’s character is more grounded, but he is also more passive. He watches things happen to him rather than making decisions, and the film rarely asks him to step outside himself and question what he wants. The result is a story about two people who love each other without ever asking why they deserve each other.
The Friends Around William
The friends who surround William add texture to the world around him, but they exist mainly to provide comic relief. Their jokes land sometimes and miss sometimes, and the film never quite finds a rhythm with them. These characters are pleasant, but they are not essential to the story.
Where the Film Works
The film’s best moments come when it stops explaining itself and lets the actors breathe. Grant and Roberts have real chemistry, and when the script gets out of their way, the scenes between them crackle with something close to honesty. Those moments are rare, but they are memorable.
The film also benefits from its setting. Notting Hill is filmed with care, and the streets, shops, and cafes feel lived-in. The production design adds a layer of authenticity that the script often lacks.
Where It Falls Short
The middle of the film drags. There is a stretch where the plot stalls and the characters sit around talking about their feelings without saying anything new. The pacing suffers, and the film loses momentum at exactly the point where it should be building toward its climax.
The ending arrives too quickly after a slow middle, and it feels rushed rather than earned. The resolution is neat, but it does not feel like the natural conclusion of a story that has spent so much time establishing its stakes.
The Romance’s Weakness
The romance itself is the film’s biggest weakness. It asks the audience to believe in a connection between two people who never really understand each other. William never asks Anna what it costs her to be famous, and Anna never asks William what it costs him to love someone who cannot leave her world behind. The film never resolves that imbalance, and the relationship feels less like a union and more like a fantasy.
Here is how the film’s strengths and weaknesses rank:
- Grant’s performance — the strongest element of the film
- The chemistry between Grant and Roberts — a genuine highlight
- The production design — a pleasant, lived-in setting
- The friends around William — pleasant but minor
- The romance — a believable idea poorly executed
- The middle section — a stretch where the film loses momentum
- The ending — a rushed resolution that feels earned
A Modest Success
Notting Hill is not a great film, but it is not a failure either. It is a modest success, one that knows exactly what it wants to be and delivers it without pretense. The performances are solid, the setting is lovely, and the heart is in the right place, even when the execution falters.
The film is at its best when it stops trying to be profound and simply lets Grant and Roberts play opposite each other. That is the real strength of the picture, and it is enough to recommend it to anyone looking for a pleasant evening at the cinema.
Final Score
Notting Hill is a pleasant, uneven romance that works best when it stops explaining itself and lets the actors do their jobs. Hugh Grant and Julia Roberts carry the film with warmth and sincerity, even when the script beneath them stumbles. The setting is lovely, the middle drags, and the ending rushes, but the film earns its place as a modest success.
It is a film to watch with low expectations and a soft heart. It will not change your mind about love, but it will spend two hours making you forget you ever wanted it to.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
