Ghostbusters II wants to be a bigger, louder version of the 1984 hit. It mostly fails.
The premise is simple: New York City is flooded with negative energy, and the original team must stop it before it destroys the city. Ivan Reitman returns to direct, and Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis write the script together again. Bill Murray, Aykroyd, Ramis and Sigourney Weaver all return, joined by Annie Potts as a new character.
Trailer, via Ghostbusters.
The Problem With Bigger
The problem is scale. The first movie worked because its ghosts were funny and strange. This one tries to make the villain a full-scale disaster movie threat, and the tone can’t hold both registers. The result is a film that spends half its runtime on comedy and the other half on disaster-movie action, with little overlap between the two.
Weaver plays a politician who becomes obsessed with the Ghostbusters, and her scenes are some of the sharpest in the film. Murray’s Dr. Peter Venkman remains the center of attention, but the script asks him to be more of a hero than he ever wanted to be, and the performance suffers for it.
Aykroyd’s Additions
Aykroyd adds a second ghost-hunting team, led by Ernie Hudson’s Winston Zeddemore, which gives the film a rival group to compete with. That’s a clever idea, but the execution is thin. The new team exists mainly to provide comic relief and a plot device, not a genuine threat.
The special effects are dated by 1989 standards, and the slime and ghost sequences look cheap next to the first film’s work. The film also leans heavily on music, with songs that feel out of place next to the action.
Comparing The Two Films
| Element | Ghostbusters | Ghostbusters II |
|---|---|---|
| Tone | Comedy-first horror | Comedy mixed with disaster action |
| Villain | Stay Puft Man | Negative energy cloud |
| New characters | None added | Annie Potts’ Janine Melnitz |
| Music | Minimal | Songs scattered through the film |
The comparison shows the problem clearly. The first film knew exactly what it wanted to be. This one tries to be two things at once, and neither gets the full treatment.
The Verdict
Ghostbusters II isn’t a failure, but it doesn’t reach the heights of the original. The jokes land less often, the stakes feel smaller, and the effects look dated. Weaver’s performance and the Aykroyd additions are the bright spots, but they aren’t enough to carry the whole film.
It’s a watchable sequel, not a great one.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
