WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
About
CLAY TRIBUNE.
ShopCartAccount
Advertisement

Sing 2 Sings the Same Old Song: Bigger, Louder, Weaker

Sing 2 piles on new songs and stars but can't escape its predecessor's tired formula. A competent sequel, not a great one.

By mitch·4 min read
Animals perform on a brightly lit stage in an animated musical scene.

Sing 2 wants to be the bigger, louder sequel to its predecessor, and it mostly succeeds. The problem is that bigger and louder only go so far when the joke underneath is the same one told three years earlier. Director Garth Jennings has packed the sequel with new songs, new characters, and a new setting, but the core of the movie remains the same: animals singing pop songs while humans look on in wonder. That formula worked once. It doesn’t work twice.

Trailer, via Illumination.

Meowing and Roaring

The plot follows Buster Moon, voiced by Matthew McConaughey, who leads a group of performers through a new stage production. This time the venue is a massive theater, and the goal is to save it from demolition. The stakes are higher than in the first movie, but the execution isn’t. The film spends its runtime moving from one set piece to the next, each one designed to showcase a different song and a different animal.

Advertisement

The new songs are the biggest addition here. They include:

  • A pop ballad performed by Johnny Depp’s cat
  • A rock anthem sung by a gorilla
  • A dance number led by a pig
  • A slow burn duet between two older animals

None of these songs are bad. None of them are memorable either. They’re competent, professional, and entirely forgettable. The movie leans on star voices to sell the music, but the songs themselves lack the spark that made the original’s hits feel special.

Voice Cast Carries the Weight

The voice cast is the reason anyone returns to this sequel. McConaughey remains the heart of the film, playing Buster with the same mix of desperation and charm that defined him before. T.J. Miller returns as his sidekick, adding a steady stream of jokes that land more often than they miss. Reese Witherspoon, Seth MacFarlane, and Scarlett Johansson round out the main group, each given moments to shine even as the script treats them as interchangeable parts of the ensemble.

The newcomers don’t fare as well. The new characters are introduced quickly and given little room to develop beyond their vocal numbers. A young elephant and a mouse get some screen time, but neither gets enough to matter. The film is at its best when it’s following the established group, and at its worst when it tries to build new relationships around them.

Music Over Story

The songs are the engine of Sing 2, and the story is the chassis that can barely keep up. The plot is thin. The villain is a developer who wants to tear down the theater, and his plan is so simple it barely requires a character. The stakes are announced early and never raised. The climax involves a final performance that feels like a repeat of the first movie’s ending.

There’s no surprise here. The movie tells you exactly where it’s going from the first scene, and it doesn’t deviate. That’s not necessarily fatal. What is fatal is that the film doesn’t use its time to deepen its characters or its world. It uses its time to add songs and stretch the running time.

Where It Falls Short

Sing 2 is a competent, polished piece of animation that never reaches for greatness. The animation is bright, the staging is wide, and the songs are pleasant. None of that adds up to a movie that earns its place beside the original. The sequel is missing something the first film had in abundance: a sense of discovery.

  1. The songs are bigger and louder than in the first movie.
  2. The story is thinner and less interesting.
  3. The new characters are introduced but never developed.
  4. The jokes are the same as before, just repeated.
  5. The ending feels like a repeat of the first movie’s ending.

Each of these points is a small failure on its own. Together, they add up to a film that feels like it’s repeating itself. The movie isn’t broken. It’s just missing the spark that made its predecessor special.

Final Word

Sing 2 is a disappointment. It’s a sequel that coasts on the goodwill of its predecessor rather than earning its own identity. The songs are pleasant, the cast is game, and the animation is bright. But none of that adds up to a movie that stands on its own. It’s a bigger, louder version of a formula that worked once and now feels exhausted.

The film is at its best when it stops trying to be a sequel and lets the performers just sing. Those moments are few and far between. Most of the runtime is spent building toward a climax that feels inevitable from the first frame. There’s no tension, no surprise, no payoff. Just a series of songs strung together until the credits roll.

Sing 2 is not a bad movie. It’s just not a good one. It’s a competent, polished piece of entertainment that will satisfy fans of the original but won’t win over anyone else. The sequel is a shadow of its predecessor, and it knows it. That knowledge shows in every frame.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.