Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds opens in a San Francisco pet store, where a lawyer named Mitch Brenner walks in looking for lovebirds for his sister’s 11th birthday. He recognizes Melanie Daniels, a socialite he has seen in court over a practical joke gone wrong. He pretends to mistake her for a shop employee, quizzes her on bird species, watches her fail, then reveals he knew exactly who she was and leaves.
It is a strange, controlled way to start a horror film, and it is the whole method of The Birds in miniature: a social game, played in a bright room, with animals watching from cages the entire time. That is this paper’s reading, not the film’s own statement.
Trailer, via Universal Pictures At Home.
A gull at the Bodega Bay wharf
Melanie buys the lovebirds and drives to Bodega Bay after learning Mitch has gone to his family’s farm there. She learns his sister’s name from Annie Hayworth, a local teacher and Mitch’s ex-lover, whose relationship with him ended because of his mother, Lydia. Melanie rents a boat and crosses the bay to leave the lovebirds at the farm without being seen.
Mitch spots her leaving and drives to the dock to meet her. There, at the wharf, a gull attacks Melanie and draws blood. Mitch tends the wound and invites her to dinner.
The film spends its early stretch on manners — who knows whom, who left whom, who is staying at whose house — and then a single bird interrupts all of it. Whether Hitchcock explains that attack is a matter of interpretation. The wound is real. The cause is not given to us, and in our view the film never supplies one. That is the paper’s judgment, not a fact the source states.
Lydia’s hens and Cathy’s birthday party
At the Brenner farm, Lydia’s hens have stopped eating. Lydia dislikes Melanie on the strength of her gossip-column reputation. The death of Mitch’s father four years earlier comes up in conversation. Mitch invites Melanie, who is staying with Annie, to Cathy’s birthday party the next day.
A dead gull turns up at Annie’s door. Then, during the party, gulls attack and wound the children at the game.
In our view the sequence is the film’s best argument for itself. A party is an assembly of small, ordinary things — cake, children, a game — and Hitchcock lets the attack arrive inside that ordinariness rather than around it. Nothing about the scene reads as a set piece until it already is one. That is a judgment about craft, not something the source asserts.
Sparrows through the chimney
That evening, while Melanie dines with the Brenners, sparrows pour into the house through the chimney. Mitch tells her to put off the drive back to San Francisco and stay the night.
The next morning, Lydia visits a neighbor to talk about the chickens.
Each attack in the film arrives, and each one is followed by people trying to return to normal — a meal, a conversation about poultry, a night’s sleep. Whether that rhythm amounts to a structure is our reading. Hitchcock never has a character decide what the birds mean, and the birds never say. That is opinion, and we hold it as opinion.
What the film does give you is a town with a shape:
- Melanie Daniels, the outsider who arrives with a cage of lovebirds as a gift
- Mitch Brenner, the lawyer whose mother cannot tolerate another woman in his life
- Lydia Brenner, who lost her husband four years ago and fears losing her son
- Annie Hayworth, the ex-lover who stayed in Bodega Bay anyway
- Cathy Brenner, whose 11th birthday party is interrupted by the gull attack on the children
- Bodega Bay itself, a seaside town that becomes a trap
Tippi Hedren’s film debut
The Birds introduced Tippi Hedren in her film debut, opposite Rod Taylor as Mitch, Jessica Tandy as Lydia, Suzanne Pleshette as Annie, and Veronica Cartwright as Cathy. Ethel Griffies plays Mrs. Bundy, Charles McGraw plays Sebastian Sholes, Ruth McDevitt plays Mrs. MacGruder, Lonny Chapman plays Deke Carter, and Malcolm Atterbury plays Deputy Al Malone.
Hitchcock makes his signature cameo at the start, walking two Sealyham Terriers out of the pet shop. They were his own dogs, named Geoffrey and Stanley.
The screenplay is by Evan Hunter, working from Daphne du Maurier’s 1952 short story of the same name. Hitchcock told Hunter to keep du Maurier’s title and her concept of unexplained bird attacks, and to build new characters and a more elaborate plot around them. That is the whole of the instruction the source gives.
What the Academy missed
At the 36th Academy Awards, Ub Iwerks was nominated for Best Special Effects for The Birds. The award went to Emil Kosa Jr. for Cleopatra — the only other nominee in the category. Hedren won the Golden Globe for New Star of the Year – Actress.
The Iwerks loss is the detail worth sitting with, in our view, because the bird attacks remain the film’s most discussed element. A category with two nominees is not much of a contest, and the Academy gave its statue that year to Cleopatra. That is a fact about the 1963 awards, not about the film. We read the loss as a footnote; the film’s reputation did not depend on it.
Why The Birds still works
The Birds opened to mixed reviews. Its reputation improved over time, and it is now counted among the greatest horror films ever made. In 2016, the Library of Congress deemed it “culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant” and selected it for the National Film Registry. The reversal is not something the source explains, and this paper will not pretend to.
What separates The Birds from much of the horror that followed it, in our view, is its refusal to supply a reason. There is no scientist with a theory, no final scene that reframes the attacks, no moment where a character says what the birds want. Those are our observations about the film, not claims the source makes.
The tagline reads: “…and remember, the next scream you hear may be your own!” It is a line of advertising. We read it as a fair summary of the film’s method — the threat is not explained, so it cannot be dismissed — but that reading is ours, not the source’s.
The performances, in our judgment, carry the same restraint. Hedren plays Melanie as a woman whose social skill stops working when the birds arrive. Tandy’s Lydia is a mother whose grief has hardened into a grip on her son. Pleshette’s Annie is the ex who stayed, and plays her without resentment. These are the paper’s impressions of the acting, not descriptions from the source.
The complaint that The Birds never explains itself is common enough, and in our view it is not a flaw in the film. It is the film. A monster with a motive can be negotiated with, understood, defeated. A flock cannot. Hitchcock put on screen not a bird but a town full of people who have no idea what is happening to them and no way to find out. That is the paper’s conclusion, drawn from what the film does, not a claim the source makes.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
