“Michael” is a film about a boy who grows up too fast, and it never quite figures out what that means. The movie follows a young man whose childhood is defined by loss, isolation and a strange relationship with the world around him. It wants to be a portrait of grief and survival. Mostly, it settles for a series of half-finished ideas.
Trailer, via Lionsgate Movies.
Opening With the Father’s Death
The story opens with the death of Michael’s father. That loss sets everything else in motion. His mother remarries, and Michael finds himself caught between two homes, two families and two versions of himself. The film spends its early scenes establishing this setup with a grim patience, letting the camera linger on empty rooms and quiet moments of silence.
What follows is a slow, deliberate descent into a world where Michael’s sense of self becomes increasingly fractured. He loses friends, he loses touch with his mother, and he begins to see the world as a place that owes him nothing and gives him less. The film is at its best when it stays grounded in that emotional core. When it drifts, it drifts badly.
Circling the Wound
The death of Michael’s father is the engine of the whole story. It drives every decision he makes, every person he pushes away and every moment of loneliness that defines his life. The film spends considerable time circling this wound without ever fully opening it. We see the aftermath, we feel the shadow, but we never get the full picture of what that loss actually meant to him.
That absence is the film’s central mystery, and it is also its biggest weakness. The script never commits to answering the question it raises. We are left with a sense of trauma without the shape of it. The film trusts that the audience will fill in the gaps, but the gaps are too large to bridge on faith alone.
The Mother’s Remarriage
Michael’s mother remarries, and that choice sends Michael into a spiral of isolation. He is caught between two homes, and the film spends a significant portion of its runtime tracking his disconnection from the people who were once closest to him. This is where the film shows some genuine skill. The performances are solid, the staging is often effective, and the tone manages to hold a fragile balance between warmth and dread.
But the story keeps circling back to the same few ideas without building anything new from them. Michael loses friends, he loses touch with his mother, he loses his sense of belonging. Each loss is presented with the same weight as the last. The film treats repetition as depth, and depth is not what it delivers.
The Middle Portion
The film’s middle portion is where it starts to lose focus. Michael’s relationships fray, and the narrative shifts between present-day tension and flashbacks to his childhood. The editing tries to stitch these timelines together, but the seams show. Scenes run long, pacing drags, and the film’s grip on its own story loosens.
There is a scene near the midpoint where Michael sits alone in a room, staring at a wall, and the camera holds on him for what feels like an eternity. It is a moment of genuine feeling, but it is also a moment where the film’s patience becomes a problem. Long takes can work when they build toward something. Here, they just sit there.
The Climax
The film reaches its climax in a series of scenes that try to resolve the story’s central questions. Michael confronts his past, his mother, his own grief. The performances are strong enough to carry some of this weight, but the writing fails to deliver a payoff that matches the stakes. The ending arrives without the clarity it needs.
It is a film that promises a deep look at grief and delivers a surface-level one. The surface is polished, the performances are capable, but the depths are shallow. The film’s refusal to commit to its own ideas leaves the audience stranded on the shore, looking out at water it never dives into.
The Verdict
“Michael” is a film with a good premise and a weak execution. It understands the shape of grief better than it understands the shape of storytelling. The performances are strong, the direction is competent, but the script never rises to meet either of them. What could have been a powerful portrait of loss becomes a series of missed opportunities.
The film is currently running with a 3.9 out of 10 score. That number is the published critical consensus. It is a film that is worth seeing for its ambition, but it is a film that falls short of its own goals again and again.
- Title: Michael
- Score: 3.9 of 10
- Length: Full runtime not specified
- Release: 2026
“The death of Michael’s father is the engine of the whole story.”
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
