Midterms 2026See who we think should earn your vote, based on our standardsThe guide →
WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
About
CLAY TRIBUNE.
ShopCartAccount
Advertisement

Ten Years On, Lights Out Still Suffers From a Great Setup That Never Pays Off

A dark creature, summoned by a switched-off light, stalks a house in this tale of terror, wherein a mother's shadow becomes a monstrous thing.

By mitch·4 min read
A dark, shadowy figure rises from the darkness within a dimly lit chamber.

Lights Out opens with a simple premise: a light switch triggers something unseen, something that wants to get inside a room. That premise holds the film together for about forty minutes. After that, the movie starts to lose its grip, and the monster that once felt dangerous becomes a set piece, a gimmick, a reason for people to run down hallways and slam doors.

The setup is strong. A young woman, Rebecca, lives with her sister, Kaylie, and their mother, Esther. Esther is not well. She hears voices, sees things that aren’t there, and she has a habit of turning off the lights in the middle of conversations, as if that solves everything. Rebecca is tired of it. Kaylie is curious. Their father left years ago, and the sisters are stuck with a mother who is slowly falling apart. The film spends its early scenes building tension through small, quiet moments: a shadow in the corner, a sound behind a closed door, a hand reaching out of darkness.

Then comes the reveal. Esther is not just ill. She is being controlled by a creature, a dark version of herself, that feeds on fear and lives in the dark. Turning off the lights calls it out. Keeping the lights on traps it. This is where Lights Out earns its keep. The concept is smart, and the execution is tight. The monster is not shown fully until late in the film, which forces the audience to imagine what it looks like, and that imagination is often scarier than anything the screen shows.

Advertisement

Trailer, via Warner Bros..

Esther’s Dark Side

Esther’s dark side is the heart of the film. Played with a slow, creeping dread by Alicia Vela-Bailey, she moves through the house like a predator who has learned to move without making noise. Her lines are hollow, her movements are deliberate, and her presence fills a room even when she is not speaking. The film trusts her performance to carry the horror, and it mostly works. There is a moment near the middle where Esther, possessed, stands over Rebecca’s bed while Kaylie watches from the doorway, and the tension builds without a single jump scare. That scene alone justifies the film’s existence.

Kaylie and Rebecca’s relationship is the other strength. They argue, they fight, they protect each other. Rebecca is the practical one, trying to get Kaylie to leave and start a new life. Kaylie is the one who believes in the monster, who thinks the darkness is real. Their bond carries the film through its quieter stretches, and when the horror finally breaks loose, their fear feels earned.

The Middle Stretch Weakens

The problem starts around the halfway mark. Once the rules of the monster are established, the film shifts into a series of chase scenes, trap rooms, and close calls that feel less like a story and more like a haunted house ride. Rebecca gets locked in a closet. Kaylie gets cornered in a bathroom. Esther gets dragged into the basement. Each sequence is competently made, but they repeat the same beats: someone turns off the light, something appears, someone runs. The novelty wears thin fast.

The pacing suffers too. The film slows to a crawl during its middle stretch, spending long minutes on characters talking about fear and darkness instead of showing it. A subplot involving a police officer, Detective Bright, adds nothing. His scenes exist only to pad the runtime, and his character is a flat, uninteresting presence next to the sharp performances of the three leads. The film would have been stronger without him.

Where It Falls Short

The ending is a letdown. After building the monster as a terrifying force, the film resolves the conflict with a twist that feels rushed and underdeveloped. The final image is a cheat, a quick fix that ignores everything the film spent an hour setting up. It is a shame, because the setup was so good.

There are also some technical issues. The sound design is occasionally overdone, with creaks and whispers that drown out dialogue. The editing is choppy in a few action sequences, cutting between shots before the eye has a chance to process what is happening. These are minor complaints, but they add up in a film that is already struggling with its second half.

  • The monster is a clever idea, but it is used too often.
  • The middle stretch drags with unnecessary talk about fear.
  • The twist ending feels rushed and underdeveloped.
  • Detective Bright is a wasted role.
  • The sound design drowns out the actors at times.

What Works

Despite its flaws, Lights Out has a strong core. The performances are solid across the board. Alicia Vela-Bailey is excellent as Esther, and the two sisters, played by Teresa Palmer and Alex Wolff, bring real chemistry to their roles. The cinematography is moody, favoring shadows and silhouettes over bright, obvious scares. The film knows when to hold back and when to push, and it commits fully to its central concept.

It is a film that is best remembered for what it promises rather than what it delivers. The setup is great, the execution is mixed, and the payoff falls short. It is not a bad movie, but it is a disappointing one.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.