Arnold Schwarzenegger’s sword swings and James Earl Jones’s baritone threaten to overwhelm the whole picture, and mostly they do. John Milius’s Conan the Barbarian (1982) is a film about vengeance, steel and a man who refuses to accept his fate, and it knows exactly what it is. It just doesn’t always know how to show it.
Trailer, via Arrow Video.
The Horrible Beginning
The film opens with a massacre. Raiders kill Conan’s parents, leaving the boy alive to be enslaved on the Wheel of Pain. That scene is brutal and fast, establishing the stakes without wasting a second on exposition.
The Wilderness Triumvirates
Conan escapes and becomes a killing machine. He meets Valeria and Subotai, and the trio set out to rescue King Osric’s daughter from Thulsa Doom’s cult. The action holds together, even when the dialogue thins out. Schwarzenegger plays the part as pure physical force, and the film leans on that performance rather than trying to dig beneath it.
Doom’s Temple and the Tree of Woe
The film’s centerpiece is Conan’s infiltration of Doom’s temple. Captured, crucified and tortured, he listens as Doom preaches about flesh over steel. It’s a moment that could work as a hinge of the story, but it plays more like a setup for a fight than a revelation about the man he’s hunting. The mechanical effects, built through Milius’s approach of mechanical constructs and optical illusions, are impressive in their way, but they can’t carry the weight of the scene’s meaning.
Akiro and the Mounds
After Conan is rescued, he’s brought to Akiro. The film’s narrator, a character whose presence is never explained, sums up the journey so far. It’s a strange choice, and it feels like a concession to a script that hasn’t quite figured out what it wanted to say.
What’s Missing
The film is a product of its era, and it shows. The violence is graphic, the villains are cartoonishly evil, and the women are often objects rather than agents. None of that is new to the genre, but the film doesn’t push past it either.
This Conan is less powerful, less talkative, and less educated than Howard’s
That line, from Robert Garcia’s review of the film in his American Fantasy magazine, captures the film’s central problem: it has the body of the barbarian, but not the mind. The performances are physical, the sets are grand, but the script never matches the ambition of the premise.
| Scene | Length |
|---|---|
| Opening massacre | Brutal and fast |
| Escape and training | Long |
| Rescue mission | Long |
| Temple infiltration | Long |
| Rescue and finale | Short |
Verdict
Conan the Barbarian is a flawed but exciting adventure. Its strengths are physical: the fights, the sets, the performances. Its weaknesses are structural: a thin script that leans on spectacle instead of character. Schwarzenegger is the reason to watch, but the film rarely asks him to do more than flex.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
