Fear Street: 1994 wants to be three things at once: a horror movie, a mystery, and a period drama about a town carrying a curse. Leigh Janiak’s film splits its runtime between present-day teens and flashbacks stretching back centuries, and that split is also the problem. The result is a movie that knows too much about its own history to build real dread in the now.
The setup is simple. A string of brutal killings rocks a small town, and a group of teenagers led by Deena (Kiana Madeira) and Samantha Fraser (Olivia Scott Welch) decide to face the evil force that has haunted their community for generations. The cast is young and game, with Benjamin Flores Jr., Julia Rehwald, Fred Hechinger, Maya Hawke, Charlene Amoia, David Thompson, Noah Bain Garret, Darrell Britt-Gibson, Ashley Zukerman and Jana Allen rounding out the ensemble. The performances are competent across the board, but the script by Janiak, Phil Graziadei and Kyle Killen keeps bouncing between timelines without giving any single scene room to breathe.
Trailer, via Netflix.
The Timeline Problem
The flashback structure is the film’s biggest weakness. Scenes set in 1994 alternate with sequences from earlier eras, and the editing rarely lets viewers settle into one thread before cutting away to another. This is a horror movie that spends more time explaining its own backstory than building tension in the present day.
Face the evil.
That tagline sums up the film’s approach. It tells you exactly what to expect, and it delivers on that promise, even if the delivery is uneven.
What Works
The film gets some things right. Madeira and Welch anchor the story with a chemistry that keeps the present-day plot grounded despite the chaos around them. The horror elements are serviceable, if not especially memorable. The town itself feels lived-in, and the sense of history hanging over it is tangible even when the storytelling gets lost.
The pacing suffers from the constant switching between timelines. A viewer has to keep track of multiple narratives while the film moves between 1994, earlier centuries and the present day. It’s a lot to ask, and the film doesn’t always make the case for why we need to see both timelines at once.
A Fair Score
Fear Street: 1994 is ambitious, and ambition deserves credit. The film wants to do something different with its horror template, and it occasionally succeeds. But the execution falls short of the idea, and the split timeline keeps getting in its own way.
| Element | Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Cast | Committed performances | Overmatched by the script |
| Setting | Strong sense of place | Too many timelines |
| Tone | Ambitious mix of horror and history | Uneven pacing |
| Runtime | 108 minutes | Too many threads |
Fear Street: 1994 is a film that shows flashes of something better than it becomes. The performances are strong, the setting is rich, and the idea behind it is smart. But the split timeline, coupled with a script that can’t decide what it wants to be, drags down what could have been a tighter, scarier ride. As it stands, Fear Street: 1994 is a middling entry in a franchise that’s trying to do too much at once.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
