The EU’s banking watchdog wants crypto lending to play by the same rules as other financial services — and it thinks the existing crypto law can handle it. The European Banking Authority (EBA) has asked the European Commission to bring crypto borrowing and lending under the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework, treating firms that let clients borrow or lend digital assets as regulated service providers.
The request comes in response to the Commission’s targeted consultation on MiCA, which is reviewing how the law applies to stablecoins, crypto classification and reporting requirements. The EBA’s position is that crypto lending is growing fast across the bloc, and that easier access through crypto firms and AI tools is blurring the line between centralized and decentralized finance — which makes the whole project sound like chasing a moving target.
What MiCA Covers So Far
MiCA is the European Union’s main law on crypto-assets. It currently covers issuance and trading of crypto-assets, including security tokens and utility tokens. The EBA’s proposal would extend MiCA’s reach to crypto lending and firms that help clients access decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols. That means a wider set of activities would sit under the same regulatory umbrella.
What the EBA Wants the Commission to Analyze
The EBA is not asking for immediate action. Instead, it wants the Commission to do a cost-benefit analysis of adding intermediating crypto borrowing and lending to the list of services regulated under MiCA. The regulator also suggests requirements for crypto firms that provide clients access to DeFi lending protocols.
The analysis would look at the costs of new compliance and oversight, alongside the benefits of better consumer protection and financial stability. The EBA’s recommendation is that the EC conduct this analysis before deciding whether to amend the law.
The Proposed Measures
The EBA has flagged several areas where it thinks regulation might land:
- Suitability tests for users, to ensure clients understand the risks before they borrow or lend
- Leverage limits, to stop clients from borrowing too much relative to their holdings
- Additional disclosure requirements, giving consumers clearer information about what they are getting into
- Certification for DeFi lending protocols, to set standards for decentralized systems
- Restrictions on lending involving asset-referenced or e-money tokens that require MiCA authorization
These measures mirror the kinds of controls already applied to traditional finance. The difference is that crypto lending often happens through decentralized protocols, which are harder to police.
Why the EBA Cites Growing Activity
The EBA cites previous research showing borrowing and lending activities in at least 16 EU member states. It also points to how crypto firms and AI tools are making DeFi easier to access, which is pushing the boundary between centralized and decentralized finance.
The regulator’s concern is that as crypto lending moves online and becomes more automated, the protections that apply to banks and brokers may not fully cover what happens on a blockchain. By bringing crypto lending under MiCA, the EBA hopes to close that gap.
The Blurring Line Between Centralized and Decentralized Finance
The EBA’s central argument is that the distinction between centralized and decentralized finance is becoming harder to draw. Crypto firms act as intermediaries, even when the underlying lending happens on a protocol anyone can join. AI tools make that access smoother still.
That blurring is the problem the EBA is trying to solve. If a client borrows crypto through a firm, the firm should face the same scrutiny as a bank that lends fiat money.
Related Watchdog Warnings
The EBA’s consultation response arrives alongside other warnings from EU watchdogs about the risks of quantum computing in finance. Those warnings are separate from the MiCA review, but they point to a broader pattern of concern about emerging technology reshaping financial markets.
The quantum computer warning is a reminder that technology is changing faster than regulation can keep up.
What Happens Next
The Commission’s consultation is ongoing, and the EBA’s input is part of a broader picture. Other stakeholders will respond, and the Commission will weigh all views before deciding whether to amend MiCA.
The EBA’s proposal is a push for clarity. It asks the Commission to treat crypto lending as a regulated activity, with the same disclosure and oversight that applies to other financial services. Whether the Commission agrees will depend on the cost-benefit analysis and the strength of the arguments made during the consultation.
The EBA’s position is that crypto lending is growing, the lines are blurring, and the law should keep pace. The question is whether the law can move fast enough to catch the targets it is chasing.
| Stage | What Happens |
|---|---|
| Now | EBA responds to Commission consultation on MiCA |
| Next | Commission weighs responses and decides whether to amend MiCA |
| Outcome | Possible expansion of MiCA scope to crypto lending |
The EBA’s proposal is a push for clarity. It asks the Commission to treat crypto lending as a regulated activity, with the same disclosure and oversight that applies to other financial services. Whether the Commission agrees will depend on the cost-benefit analysis and the strength of the arguments made during the consultation.
The EBA’s position is that crypto lending is growing, the lines are blurring, and the law should keep pace. The question is whether the law can move fast enough to catch the targets it is chasing.
Source material: “EU banking watchdog calls for crypto lending rules under MiCA,” Cointelegraph.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.