People around the nation fear federal meddling, late ballots, and polling-place oversight — even though federal law forbids any of it. Local leaders want to calm those fears, yet they worry their attempts might make things worse.
Voters are currently facing uncertainty at the polls. This summer, President Trump signed an executive order restricting mail voting, and that order went through the legal system until the Supreme Court stopped it last week. The actual rules for voting by mail have not changed. Still, local officials across the nation report that citizens are approaching them with queries about what the process now looks like.
“‘How is this going to work? How are you going to make sure my ballot is counted? How am I going to get my ballot?’ — I’m hearing all of these things,” said Carly Koppes, a local Republican voting official in Weld County, Colo. When asked how this cycle compares to previous elections she has overseen, Koppes didn’t hesitate. “This is my 22nd year [running elections],” she said. “Absolutely, this is the most uncertain.”
Fewer than half of voters say they expect the midterms to be “free and fair elections,” according to polling this month by the University of California San Diego. A new NPR/PBS News/Marist survey found that three-fourths of voters trust their own state and local officials to run a fair election. The polls also focus on two particular areas of concern.
- Four in 10 voters say they expect federal immigration enforcement agents to be present at polling places in their area, despite federal law banning armed federal troops from election sites.
- Voters who expect mail ballots to be delivered on time dropped sharply after the Supreme Court ruling against Trump’s mail ballot proposal.
- A separate poll, commissioned by the Partnership for Large Election Jurisdictions, found that 62% of respondents said they were worried “legal or political disputes over election rules could affect whether their own ballot is counted this year.”
This election year has been clouded by it in ways that many voters can’t even fully articulate. “Grandmothers approach me concerned, and I say, ‘What are you concerned about?’ And they say, ‘I don’t know. I just feel afraid that something might happen,'” Stephanie Thomas, Connecticut’s Democratic secretary of state, said while speaking at an event hosted by the Center for Election Innovation & Research.
What Officials Are Hearing
Voters are sorting through conflicting headlines and court rulings, and Koppes says they keep asking anxious questions. She hears people wonder about the mechanics of the process, ballot security, and the practical steps needed to actually cast a vote.
Thomas’s experience with grandmothers reflects a broader pattern: worry that feels abstract and hard to pin down. People sense trouble but can’t name it.
Voting officials are trying to thread the needle of engaging with voters about their fears while reassuring them that laws are in place to protect them. “From time to time, it’s appropriate to sound the alarm, but you don’t want to be alarmist,” Steve Simon, Minnesota’s Democratic secretary of state, said at the same CEIR event. “That’s the balance we’re trying to strike.”
Simon said his state’s high-profile confrontations with federal immigration authorities this year are “still a fresh wound,” so many voters there are worried what the federal government might be planning this fall. “I want to be honest about what could be coming,” he said. “But I always add very quickly that I think some of these scenarios are unlikely and that if they were to come to pass, we feel good about the laws and the tools and the partnership and the resolve that we have in Minnesota to overcome those challenges.”
The Polling Numbers
The UC San Diego poll discovered that under half of voters anticipate the midterms will be “free and fair elections.”. This statistic stands out because it points to a foundation of distrust that existed before the present series of scandals. The Marist survey’s number is drawn from voters who trust their own state and local officials, rather than the federal system.
The drop in confidence about mail ballots is particularly striking. A sharp decline over two years is a notable shift, and it followed the Supreme Court’s intervention in the legal fight over Trump’s executive order.
The Partnership for Large Election Jurisdictions survey adds a further dimension. Those polled expressed concern that legal or political disagreements might influence whether their ballot gets counted.
The Uncertainty Gap
With a career spanning 22 years, Koppes brings a long view to current events. Through several election cycles, she has watched voters grow more attentive to matters they used to overlook. She calls this particular contest especially uncertain, and says people are noticing details they might once have taken for granted.
There is nothing inherently wrong with being the focus of others’ interest, yet concern over it runs deep and touches many people.
The Distrust Question
Lauren Prather, a political science professor at UC San Diego, said the relationship between confidence in elections and turnout is one of the unresolved questions in her field. “One of the unresolved relationships in political science right now is between confidence in elections and turnout,” Prather said during a media briefing about UC San Diego’s recent polling. “We don’t have good evidence — in the U.S. or in other countries — about whether people that trust the elections less end up turning out less. It’s sort of intuitive that that would be the case, but we don’t have good systematic evidence on that.”
Prather pointed out that recent elections have drawn some of the largest crowds in modern American history, even as Trump has pushed doubt about election reliability and fueled election denialism. That came from a briefing where “Despite the fact that there’s a lot of distrust out there, both sides still see elections as winnable,” Brendan Nyhan, a Dartmouth College political scientist who studies the health of U.S. democracy, was also speaking.
Nyhan took a more hopeful view of the present period. He argued that attacks on voting rights often spur turnout, since different communities and political groups come together to mobilize in reaction. “It’s possible that on net the effect is zero or even positive,” Nyhan said. “But that doesn’t mean it’s healthy for democracy for people to fear that they will be disenfranchised.”
What Might Happen to Turnout
Turnout for midterm elections has traditionally lagged behind what presidential election years draw. Now the clear question is whether those voter worries will widen that gap even further.
The idea that distrust pushes people away from engaging has real force behind it, but the proof for it is weak. History shows that voters still show up even when they lack trust. The open question now is whether this election season follows the same course.
Nyhan’s warning is the more important one. High turnout is not enough if people do not trust the results. “The distrust … creates a kind of dry tinder for elites who want to challenge the election results and undermine their legitimacy,” Nyhan said. “The fact that we’re in this position means we’re vulnerable.”
What Officials Are Doing
Officials tasked with elections are working hard to respond to questions, explain how things work, and offer assurances about security. Yet finding the right tone is difficult. Excessive calm could be seen as mere words without weight, while excessive fear might keep people from voting at all.
Simon recognizes the dangers facing the system, but he swiftly shifts his focus toward the tools and capabilities at hand for dealing with them. He argues that the system is ready to respond, despite the genuine nature of the threats.
People’s worries about their children and grandchildren land in kitchens and living rooms, and these fears are not abstract. The grandmothers who approached Thomas with vague fears serve as a reminder of that fact, concerned about what their votes actually mean.
The Bottom Line
Voters across the country express concern over federal involvement, late ballots, and oversight at polling places. These anxieties are genuine, and they are shared by many.
The doubt remains whether those promises will prove sufficient to quiet the unease. What systematic proof exists on the matter is slight, while the consequences of failure would be grave.
The best advice from officials right now is simple: show up, complete your ballot, and rely on the system to tally it accurately. The doubt that Nyhan points to is genuine, yet it has not yet driven people away from voting. Whether that habit endures through this election cycle remains an open question.
Source material: “Americans are confused and worried about elections. Will that impact turnout?,” NPR.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.