The chancellor faces two big calls before his first Budget, and the numbers behind each one are moving fast in opposite directions. John Healey admitted there had been too much doom-mongering when asked by Faisal Islam earlier this month, but the economic picture has changed since then. Oil prices are up, borrowing costs are rising, and the UK’s budget position is tightening even as consumer confidence hits a two-year high.
Healey insisted the UK had “great strengths” and “good reasons to be confident about the future of Britain.” That confidence is now being tested by two separate pressures: the cost of borrowing and the political calendar.
Oil Prices and Bond Yields
In his first weeks as chancellor, the oil price fell as low as $75 a barrel. The 10-year bond yield was 4.9%. Just over two months later, oil has largely traded above $100 and the 10-year yield is at around 5.4%.
The UK’s borrowing costs have moved sharply in the chancellor’s favour. A lower bond yield means the government pays less to borrow money, which eases pressure on the deficit. But the higher oil price cuts both ways: it raises revenue from North Sea production but also pushes up the cost of living for households.
The two figures move in opposite directions, and the chancellor has to decide which one to treat as the anchor for his Budget.
Borrowing Headroom and the Midterms
The UK’s headroom against its borrowing rules left by Rachel Reeves is £24bn. That is the cushion the chancellor has to play with, and it is shrinking as the cost of government debt rises.
This year’s headroom will be judged in three years rather than four, which changes how quickly the chancellor has to respond to the numbers. The longer assessment period gives him more room to borrow, but it also means he cannot ignore the underlying trend for long.
The 3 November US midterm elections are six days after the Budget. Both President Trump and his Iranian counterpart President Pezeshkian have suggested the elections are connected to when the war might end.
Trump said the Iranians would wait until after the elections to seek peace due to the war’s impact on the cost of living. Pezeshkian said his nation “didn’t want it to get to the midterms.”
That timing matters for the chancellor’s decision. Borrowing more to fund tax cuts or spending increases would ease the cost of living, which Trump cited as the reason the Iranians were waiting. But it would also reduce the UK’s already thin headroom against its borrowing limits.
Consumer Confidence Surges
The longest running UK consumer confidence survey has hit a two-year high. Among younger people it has not been this high since before Brexit.
Some data companies call it a “Burnham bounce,” though the weather and World Cup were also factors. The Institute of Directors said business optimism had perked up despite, rather than because of, the new government.
That confidence is real, but it is not evenly spread. Younger people have not felt this optimistic since before Brexit.
The IMF and the Fiscal Homework
The IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva dismissed the idea that advanced nations could pause their fiscal homework. She acknowledged the UK’s “fairly consistent, credible” plans.
The OBR’s new chair is Jonathan Haskel.
The IMF’s warning is direct: there is no pause button on the fiscal homework for rich countries. The UK’s plans were described as consistent and credible.
Productivity Numbers and the Hours Worked Trap
The Office for National Statistics has upgraded the UK’s productivity record, though this is because of fewer hours worked. That is a technical improvement that does not translate into real gains.
Productivity growth is the engine of long-term prosperity, and a measure that goes up because people are working fewer hours tells you nothing about whether the economy is actually getting better at turning effort into output.
The upgrade is a statistical artefact, not an economic one. The chancellor cannot borrow his way out of a productivity problem that is not being measured properly.
The Chancellor’s Two Options
The chancellor has two broad paths ahead of him:
- Protect the public finances by raising taxes and cutting spending.
- Buy time by borrowing more to smooth the transition.
The first path is cautious. It preserves the UK’s credit rating and keeps the borrowing headroom intact. The second path is expedient. It delivers immediate relief to households and businesses, but it eats into the cushion the chancellor inherited.
The choice is not easy. The oil price is high, which helps revenue. But the bond yield is also high, which makes borrowing more expensive. The headroom is thin, and the midterms are coming.
The Numbers So Far
| Early September | Late September | |
|---|---|---|
| Oil price | $75 a barrel | Above $100 |
| Bond yield | 4.9% | 5.4% |
| Consumer confidence | Two-year low | Two-year high |
The numbers are moving in the wrong direction for the chancellor’s borrowing case. The oil price is up, the bond yield is up, and the headroom is shrinking. The IMF has warned against pausing fiscal homework, and the OBR has a new chair watching the numbers.
The chancellor’s first Budget is on 28 October. Six days later comes the US midterm elections. The Iranians are waiting for peace after the vote, according to Trump.
The UK’s headroom is £24bn.
Where the paper stands
The paper backs lower costs for small businesses and the middle class and is against any government funds or carve-outs that favour the biggest players rather than the citizens who have no say. The chancellor faces a choice between protecting the public purse and smoothing the transition for households, and the paper’s judgment is clear: the first path preserves the UK’s credit rating and keeps the borrowing headroom intact.
The numbers are moving in the wrong direction for the chancellor’s borrowing case. The oil price is up, the bond yield is up, and the headroom is shrinking. The IMF has warned against pausing fiscal homework, and the OBR has a new chair watching the numbers. The choice is not easy, but the paper’s position is fixed: the citizen who has no say in these funds must come first.
The chancellor’s first Budget is on 28 October, six days before the US midterm elections. The paper will watch closely to see whether the Budget treats the middle class and small business as the anchors of the economy, or whether it favours the biggest players instead.
Source material: “Faisal Islam: The two big calls the chancellor has to make ahead of the Budget,” the BBC.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.