Midterms 2026See who we think should earn your vote, based on our standardsThe guide →
WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
CLAY TRIBUNE.
Advertisement

Twelve Years On, The Musketeers Still Struggles to Match Its Own Ambition

A review of The Musketeers, the 2014 British TV series starring Luke Pasqualino, Tom Burke, Santiago Cabrera, and Howard Charles.

By mitch·5 min read
Four musketeers in 17th-century armor stand guard outside a grand palace under moonlight.

“The Musketeers” is a 2014 British television series that sets out to capture the swashbuckling spirit of Alexandre Dumas’s classic novel. It follows four musketeers — Athos, Aramis, Porthos and D’Artagnan — as they defend King Louis XIII and 17th-century Paris against spies, traitors and schemes. The show ran for three seasons across BBC America and BBC One, airing from 2014 to 2016.

The premise is simple and effective. In 1630s Paris, Athos, Aramis and Porthos are veteran soldiers commanded by Captain Treville. D’Artagnan, a young farm boy with ambitions, joins them after proving himself in a sword duel. Together they form an elite band of soldiers who fight for justice, even when the court around them is corrupt.

Trailer, via BBC.

Advertisement

Cast and Characters

The core cast is strong. Luke Pasqualino plays D’Artagnan, bringing youthful energy and ambition to the role. Santiago Cabrera is Aramis, the smooth-talking priest who balances faith with romance. Tom Burke is Athos, the brooding swordsman with a hidden past. Howard Charles rounds out the trio as Porthos, the loyal giant with a soft spot for wine and women.

The supporting cast adds depth. Ryan Gage plays King Louis XIII, a weak and indulgent ruler who relies on his musketeers to keep him safe. Alexandra Dowling plays Queen Anne, a strong-willed figure who often outshines her husband. Maimie McCoy appears as Milady de Winter, the cunning villainess whose schemes drive several episodes. Tamla Kari plays Constance Bonacieux, D’Artagnan’s love interest.

Peter Capaldi brings a memorable turn as Cardinal Richelieu in the first season. Marc Warren joins as Comte de Rochefort in the second. Rupert Everett closes the series as Governor Feron. Each actor leaves their mark on the show’s tone, though Capaldi’s departure after the first season is a notable loss.

Setting and Tone

The series is set in 17th-century Paris, a city of narrow streets, grand palaces and shadowy alleys. The production largely filmed in the Czech Republic, and the sets capture the grimy opulence of the period. Crowds gather in market squares, nobles ride through cobbled streets, and the royal court is a maze of marble corridors and gold-trimmed chambers.

The tone is dark and gritty. This is not a whimsical adventure story. The musketeers face real danger, and the show does not shy away from violence or political intrigue. Cardinal Richelieu, for example, is a scheming figure who manipulates the king and the musketeers alike. The show treats its source material with respect, even when it diverges from the original text.

Plot and Structure

Each season follows a distinct arc. The first season introduces the characters and establishes the dynamic between them. The second season deepens the conflict with Rochefort and other enemies. The third season builds toward a finale that wraps up the main storyline.

The show borrows heavily from Dumas’s novel, but it also takes creative liberties. Some episodes explore side stories involving minor characters from the books, while others invent entirely new plots. The result is a hybrid that respects the source material while expanding it into something fresh.

One of the show’s strengths is its ensemble. The four leads share screen time evenly, and their chemistry carries the series. Pasqualino’s D’Artagnan is earnest and determined, while Burke’s Athos is a brooding presence who anchors the group. Cabrera and Charles play off each other well, with Aramis’s wit and Porthos’s loyalty creating a balanced dynamic.

Production and Technical Craft

The show’s visual style is polished. Costume design is detailed, with ornate armor, flowing cloaks and rich fabrics that reflect the era. Cinematography captures the contrast between the city’s grandeur and its squalor. The action sequences are well-choreographed.

The show’s pacing is uneven. Some episodes move at a deliberate, atmospheric crawl, while others rush through plot points at a breakneck pace. This inconsistency can frustrate viewers who want a steady rhythm. The show also leans heavily on melodrama, with emotional scenes that sometimes feel overwrought.

Reception and Legacy

The show received mixed reviews during its run. Critics praised the cast’s performances and the show’s willingness to embrace darkness, but some found the storytelling uneven and the ending rushed. The series was renewed for a third season in April 2016, with the renewal announced in February 2015. The third season premiered internationally first, before its UK premiere on 28 May 2016, concluding on 1 August 2016.

Our View

We rate “The Musketeers” as a solid entry in the swashbuckler genre. The show is a worthy adaptation that respects its source material while putting its own stamp on it. The cast is excellent, the setting is atmospheric, and the plotting is ambitious. The uneven pacing and occasional over-dramatic moments hold it back from greatness, but the overall package is engaging.

The show’s final season, which wrapped up in August 2016, brought closure to the main storyline. That closure, along with the strong performances and the show’s willingness to be dark, makes it a standout entry in the genre.

Season First Episode Last Episode
1 19 January 2014 N/A
2 N/A N/A
3 28 May 2016 1 August 2016

The show’s production schedule reflects its international scope. The first season premiered on BBC One on 19 January 2014. The third season debuted in multiple countries before its UK premiere on 28 May 2016, with the series concluding on 1 August 2016.

“The Musketeers” is a show that fans of historical drama will enjoy. It is flawed, but it is also entertaining, and it offers a darker take on a familiar story.

If you have not seen it, it is worth a watch. If you have, you know the strengths and weaknesses. The show is a solid piece of television that deserves attention, even if it does not reach the heights of its source material.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

TV reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.