TaylorMade signed Charlie Woods to an NIL deal earlier this month, and the timing could not have been better for the company. The 15-year-old son of 15-time major champion Tiger Woods is committed to Florida State and enters his senior year of high school, making him one of the most visible players in the game. His deal is exactly the kind of partnership that could get caught up in the Protect College Sports Act, which passed the Senate and is now advancing to the House of Representatives.
The vote was 77-22 on Monday, Sept. 28, on Capitol Hill. Eight co-sponsors were named, led by Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.). The bill aims to establish a national framework for college athletics, and its supporters say it is needed to bring order to a chaotic landscape where NIL deals, player movement and conference realignment have created uncertainty across the sport.
The Bill’s Core Claim
Cruz told USA TODAY Sports that the most important part of the bill is bringing order to chaos. “Litigation has struck down virtually all the rules,” he said. “Every week we see a different problem. Programs being canceled, we see women’s sports being canceled. We see Olympic sports being canceled.”
He added that the bill would protect hundreds of thousands of roster slots and scholarship positions. “We will see hundreds of thousands of roster slots and scholarship positions going away… every year right now we have roughly 500,000 college athletes in America.”
The bill would not eliminate NIL opportunities such as Woods’ partnership with TaylorMade. It would allow schools to direct additional revenue-sharing funds toward women’s and Olympic sports, which supporters say is a key feature of the proposal.
What the Bill Would Change
The Protect College Sports Act is designed to create a more stable system for college athletics. Its backers argue that the current landscape, marked by unrestricted player movement and a rapidly evolving NIL marketplace, has created uncertainty for both athletes and athletic departments.
The bill would also address the broader issue of player movement. Cruz’s supporters point to athletes transferring multiple times and competing for seven or eight years as evidence of a system out of control.
The Woods Deal at Stake
Woods’ deal with TaylorMade is a significant win for the company. The teenager has the pedigree to draw attention to any brand he attaches himself to, and TaylorMade has secured a long-term relationship with a player who is likely to be a dominant force in college golf.
The deal raises questions about whether the bill could affect how manufacturers structure their partnerships with student-athletes. The bill’s supporters have said it would not eliminate NIL opportunities, but the specifics of how those opportunities are structured could change under a national framework.
The Path Forward
The bill still needs a vote in the House before reaching President Donald Trump’s desk. The margin in the Senate was comfortable, but the outcome in the House is not yet known.
The bill’s co-sponsors include Cruz, Cantwell and Schmitt, and their arguments have resonated with lawmakers concerned about the stability of college sports.
The bill’s supporters have made their case, and the vote on Sept. 28 shows that a majority of Senators agree with them. Whether the House follows remains to be seen.
The Key Numbers
- Vote: 77-22 on Monday, Sept. 28, on Capitol Hill
- Co-sponsors: Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.)
- Roughly 500,000 college athletes in America
- Only a few dozen Division I men’s players hold manufacturer deals with compensation
The Bottom Line
The Protect College Sports Act is a response to a real problem. The chaos in college sports is not hypothetical, and the litigation that has struck down virtually all the rules governing NIL deals has created a situation where programs are being canceled and athletes are left in limbo.
The bill’s supporters have made their case, and the vote on Sept. 28 shows that a majority of Senators agree with them. Whether the House follows remains to be seen.
The Woods deal with TaylorMade is a reminder of what is at stake. The teenager has the potential to be a dominant force in college golf, and his partnership with TaylorMade is a significant win for the company.
Whether the bill passes the House and becomes law remains to be seen. But the fact that it has reached this far is a signal that the NCAA’s current model is under serious pressure.
Source material: “How the Protect College Sports Act could affect Charlie Woods and college golf,” Yahoo Sports.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.