Elon Musk is back in government, and this time the stakes are clearer. On Wednesday, Pete Hegseth announced that Musk will co-lead Project Meridian, a 120-day effort to study the future of warfare and produce an unclassified public report of its findings. The project brings together Musk, Palmer Luckey, CEO of the defense tech company Anduril, and Newt Gingrich, the former Republican speaker of the House.
The appointment marks Musk’s first return to government since he ran the so-called “department of government efficiency,” or Doge, a little more than a year ago. That stint gutted federal agencies while failing to achieve its stated cost-cutting goals. Now, the scope of Project Meridian appears much less demanding for Musk than his role at Doge, which drew heavy public criticism and costly boycotts of his products.
The Taskforce’s Goal
Project Meridian aims to identify the capabilities required to achieve absolute technological dominance on the next-generation battlefield. The project will examine how the US military can use new technology and fight in untested terrains, including subterranean depths and on the moon.
The defense department’s press release described the goal as “identifying the capabilities required to achieve absolute technological dominance on the next-generation battlefield.” The project will culminate in an unclassified public report of its recommendations.
“We are witnessing rapid advances in artificial intelligence, autonomy, directed energy, robotics, biotechnology, among other critical high-tech areas,” Hegseth said in a memo. “Combined, these new domains, new ways of fighting, and technological developments will profoundly alter the character of warfare.”
“To maintain global dominance, the United States must anticipate future operational environments and act decisively to develop the tools to dominate in them,” Hegseth concluded.
The Team Behind the Project
The trio assembled for Project Meridian each brings a distinct set of credentials to the table. Luckey runs a company that sells directly to the military. Gingrich has spent decades warning about threats to American infrastructure.
Their combined experience spans private industry, politics and the defense sector. The question now is whether that mix produces clarity or confusion.
Musk’s Return to Government
Musk’s role at Doge remains the clearest precedent for how this appointment will be judged. The project’s 120-day timeline and public report requirement appear designed to limit the friction that marred his earlier tenure.
The comparison is stark. Doge lasted far longer and touched far more agencies. Project Meridian, by contrast, is a targeted study with a fixed end date. That design suggests the defense department is trying to manage Musk’s exposure to government service rather than expose him to it fully.
Whether the project produces useful insights or becomes another flashpoint for Musk’s critics will depend on what the report actually says. The public will see the findings, and the defense department has committed to making them available.
Luckey and Anduril
Luckey’s company, Anduril, has extensive defense department contracts and advertises its products as the latest advance in warfare. Gingrich was appointed to the defense policy board in December 2020 during the first Trump administration but was dismissed less than three months later after Joe Biden became president.
Going back to the 1990s, Gingrich has warned about the threat of an electromagnetic pulse attack that could knock out US power grids.
What the Project Will Look At
The scope of Project Meridian is broad. It will consider how the US military can use new technology and fight in untested terrains, including subterranean depths and on the moon. The project will also look at how the military can operate in those environments.
The memo’s emphasis on artificial intelligence, autonomy, directed energy, robotics and biotechnology suggests the project will focus on the technologies that are changing warfare fastest.
The project’s public report requirement means the findings will be shared with the public. That commitment to transparency is a notable feature of the project’s design.
The Defense Secretary’s View
Hegseth’s memo lays out the stakes in plain terms. The United States must anticipate future operational environments and act decisively to develop the tools to dominate in them.
That is a statement of intent, not a description of a finished plan. The project’s success will be measured against whether it delivers actionable recommendations that the military can actually use.
The Public Report Requirement
The public report requirement is the key difference between Project Meridian and Doge. Where Doge operated largely in secret, with its cost-cutting goals unmet, Project Meridian commits to publishing its findings for anyone to read.
The defense department has structured the project to minimize disruption while maximizing insight. Whether that works depends on the quality of the report itself.
Where the paper stands
The paper backs narrow rules against direct harm, such as forcing companies to disclose safety failures they hid, and is against broad rules that hand the market to the incumbents, and it is against any office gathering more power over people’s lives. Musk’s return to government through Project Meridian raises the stakes because the man who once ran the so-called “department of government efficiency,” or Doge, now sits at the center of a 120-day study of warfare’s future. That earlier role gutted federal agencies without meeting its stated cost-cutting goals, and it drew heavy public criticism and costly boycotts of his products.
The paper’s position on AI and technology is a light touch: startups should not be frozen out, and the danger is big tech dominance, not the technology itself. Licensing regimes and compliance costs that only giants can afford are a moat, not a safeguard. The paper supports narrow rules against direct harm, such as requiring companies to disclose safety failures they hid, and opposes broad rules that hand the market to the incumbents.
Project Meridian is a targeted study with a fixed end date, unlike Doge, which lasted far longer and touched far more agencies. Its public report requirement is a notable feature of the project’s design, committing to transparency. But the trio assembled—Musk, Luckey of Anduril, and Gingrich—each brings a distinct set of credentials to the table. Luckey’s company sells directly to the military, and Gingrich has spent decades warning about threats to American infrastructure. Their combined experience spans private industry, politics, and the defense sector. The question now is whether that mix produces clarity or confusion.
Key Facts
- Project: Project Meridian
- Duration: 120 days
- Output: Unclassified public report of recommendations
- Leaders: Elon Musk, Palmer Luckey, Newt Gingrich
- Goal: Identify capabilities for absolute technological dominance on the next-generation battlefield
- Previous government role: Musk led Doge, a little more than a year ago
- Scope: New technology, subterranean warfare, lunar operations
- Public statement: “To maintain global dominance, the United States must anticipate future operational environments and act decisively to develop the tools to dominate in them”
The defense department has committed to transparency. The public will see the findings, and the defense department has committed to making them available. That is a step forward from Musk’s previous government work, which drew heavy public criticism and costly boycotts of his products.
The appointment of Elon Musk to lead a government study of future warfare is a notable move. Whether it works depends on the quality of the report itself.
The public will judge the project by its output, not its intention. The report will be the test.
Source material: “Pete Hegseth appoints Elon Musk to US taskforce on future of warfare,” The Guardian.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.