ROBLOX. VIDEO GAMES. MOVIES. ORIGINAL ANIMATIONS.
CLAY TRIBUNE.
Advertisement

Age of Wonders III Review: A 4X Strategy Game That Merges Genres Cleanly

Age of Wonders III review: Triumph Studios' 2014 4X fantasy strategy revival, its six races, six classes, hero leveling, alignment rework, and campaign.

By mitch·6 min read
An epic fantasy battlefield where empires clash beneath a stormy sky.

Age of Wonders III arrived in 2014 as the fourth entry in a series that had been dormant since 2003. Triumph Studios, the Dutch developer behind the original trilogy, both developed and published it. It launched March 31, 2014 for Microsoft Windows through digital distribution and retail in select territories, with ports to Linux and OS X following on April 14, 2015. The game is a 4X turn-based strategy title set in a high fantasy universe, and it earns an 8 of 10 from an IGDB critic aggregate drawn from five outlets — a score that has little to do with nostalgia and everything to do with how cleanly it merges two genres that usually fight each other.

Trailer, via Triumph Studios.

Six Races, Six Classes, One Leader

Age of Wonders III asks players to assume the role of a political-military leader, then hands them an unusual amount of control over who that leader is. The initial release offers six races: humans, draconians, high elves, dwarves, orcs, and goblins. Each determines the race of the player’s empire and carries unique perks and abilities. On top of that sit six leader classes, each with its own units and its own approach to combat and empire management.

Advertisement

The Sorcerer leans on magic for enchantments and summoning. The Theocrat builds from organized religion, with zealots, followers, holy spells and warriors. The Rogue prefers stealth, thievery, manipulation and dark magic. The Archdruid channels nature, stays self-sufficient and calls on wild creatures. The Dreadnaught runs a steampunk society of industry, machinery and gunpowder units like cannons and tanks. The Warlord specializes in direct conflict, using non-magic units and abilities.

That spread is the game’s best idea. It gives players a reason to replay beyond a different starting position, and it makes the class choice feel like a commitment rather than a coat of paint.

Leveling, Alignment, and Heroes Who Matter

Leaders and recruitable hero units gain experience and level up. They pick up new equipment and powers along the way. That structure is standard role-playing material, but it sits inside a turn-based strategy frame, which changes how every decision lands. A leveled hero is an asset worth protecting on the world map, not just a stack of stats.

Alignment works differently here than in earlier Age of Wonders games. Rather than tying good and evil to race, Age of Wonders III builds a player’s alignment from their actions and from the cultures they absorb into their empire. That is a smarter system. It lets a player’s conduct, not their character sheet, define who they become.

Cities, Giants’ Keeps, and Independent Forces

Cities provide much of the resources, infrastructure and unit recruitment in Age of Wonders III. But the world map is not divided cleanly between players. Independent cities and units exist outside any leader’s control. Units from an unaffiliated city will fight to protect that city’s domain, and they do not forget which domain they belong to.

Many of these settlements are not cities in the traditional sense. They can be alternative holdings, such as a “Giant’s Keep.” Players can conquer these holdings and get units from them like a city, or absorb them through diplomatic means by paying tribute and leveraging diplomatic or alignment standing. Quests from independent forces and cities add another layer, asking players to clear out wild units, search for relics, or conquer cities and other holdings. Rewards include gold, equipment, or the support of independent forces, sometimes with a choice between them.

A Campaign Told From Two Sides

Age of Wonders III includes a story-driven campaign playable from two perspectives, the human-centric Commonwealth Empire and the Court of the High Elves. The setup reaches back before the first game. The elven court was decimated by humans, an invasive race new to the Blessed Continent. The elves split. Meandor, son of the slain king Inioch, led the dark elves and the Cult of Storms, a group that intended to wipe out the humans. Inioch’s daughter Julia led the wood elves and the Keepers, who had no genocidal intentions. These factions clashed in the Valley of Wonders, around the ruins of the razed elven court.

The High Elf race was founded years later when Julia married a dark elf and reunited the two peoples. The Commonwealth Empire began as a joining of races for mutual protection and the sharing of knowledge. It set out with benign intentions, but once it finished expanding, humans seized power and pushed forward with technology and commerce. The Empire now means to sweep aside the old ways and assimilate the world. The Elven Court objects and wants to rally the ancient races against imperial ambitions.

That is the central conflict, and it is a better premise than most fantasy strategy games bother to construct. Two sides, both with a coherent argument, neither purely villainous.

3D, Multiplayer, and a Map Editor

Age of Wonders III presents its graphics in 3D, a break from the isometric view the series used up to that point. The game also ships with single-player scenarios, online multiplayer, random map generation and a map editor. Single player, multiplayer and co-operative modes are all supported. The soundtrack was updated for this entry.

The feature list is generous, and the map editor in particular extends the game’s life well past the campaign. Random map generation matters too. It means the 4X loop does not run dry once the hand-built scenarios are finished.

What Actually Holds Up

The role-playing additions are the reason Age of Wonders III still earns attention twelve years on. Bolting leader classes and hero leveling onto a 4X frame could have produced a mess of competing systems. Instead the two halves reinforce each other: the class shapes the empire, the empire funds the hero, the hero wins the battles that grow the empire.

The alignment rework deserves credit as well. Tying morality to conduct and absorbed cultures rather than to race was the right call, and it makes diplomacy feel like a moral act rather than a menu.

The weaker ground is the campaign structure. Two sides is a real improvement over one, but the story still serves mainly as a delivery mechanism for battles, and players who come for the 4X sandbox will spend most of their time outside it.

Age of Wonders III was critically and commercially successful, and it marked a revitalization of the series. A spin-off, Age of Wonders: Planetfall, followed in 2019. A direct sequel, Age of Wonders 4, arrived in 2023 to further commercial and critical success. That trajectory is not an accident.

Age of Wonders III was critically and commercially successful, marking a revitalization of the series.

This is the part worth watching. Triumph built a game that respected both its strategy roots and its role-playing ambitions, and the series has been building on that foundation ever since. The class system and the alignment rework are the load-bearing walls. Everything that came after stands on them.

Age of Wonders III is not the deepest 4X game ever made, and it is not the deepest RPG. It is one of the few that does both well enough that neither half feels like a compromise. For a 2014 release that revived a dormant franchise, that is more than enough.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Game reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.