WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
About
CLAY TRIBUNE.
ShopCartAccount
Advertisement

Beverly Hills, 90210 Review: A Machine That Knew Exactly What It Was Doing

A look back at Beverly Hills, 90210: its cast, formula, legacy, and why it earned a 7.3/10.

By mitch·4 min read
A group of young actors stand outside a luxury car on a sunlit Beverly Hills street.

Beverly Hills, 90210 premiered in 1990 as a teen soap about rich kids, and it became something far bigger. The show followed six West Beverly High students whose lives were defined by wealth, fame, and the occasional murder mystery. It ran for ten seasons, spawned a movie and a spinoff, and launched the careers of its young stars. Today, it holds a critical score of 7.3 out of 10.

The Cast That Defined the Decade

The show’s strength rested on its ensemble. Luke Perry played Dylan McKay, the brooding football star with a tragic past. Shannen Doherty played Brenda Walsh, the golden girl who carried the show’s emotional weight. Ian Ziering played Steve Sanders, the slick and charming jock. Jason Priestley played Brandon Walsh, the moral center and lead character. Matthew Fox played David Silver, the quiet outsider. And Brian Kraus played Kelly Taylor, the girl next door with a wild streak.

Each actor had a distinct role, and each brought something personal to it. The show’s success depended on their chemistry, and that chemistry held for years.

Advertisement

The Formula That Made It Work

The show worked because it never took itself too seriously. Episodes mixed drama with comedy, romance with mystery. A typical episode might open with a breakup, move to a fashion disaster, and end with a plot twist involving a secret identity or a hidden fortune. The show knew exactly what its audience wanted, and it delivered it week after week.

The formula was simple:

  1. Introduce a problem.
  2. Complicate it.
  3. Resolve it with a surprise.
  4. Leave a cliffhanger for next week.

It rarely strayed from that template, and it rarely needed to.

What the Show Got Right

The show captured a specific moment in American culture. It was about privilege, but it didn’t mock it. The characters were rich, but they also struggled with love, family, and self-worth. The show made its audience care about people they would never meet in real life. That connection was its greatest achievement.

The show also introduced viewers to Los Angeles in a way few shows had before. The exterior shots of Beverly Hills homes, the pool parties, the fancy cars — all of it felt new to a generation raised on suburban sitcoms. The show made the idea of being rich seem both glamorous and exhausting.

What the Show Got Wrong

Not everything landed. Some plots were silly, some villains were cartoonish, and some storylines stretched credibility. The show’s later seasons leaned harder into melodrama, and some episodes became almost unwatchable for anyone looking for subtlety. The show also faced criticism for its portrayal of women, particularly its treatment of sexual violence and its handling of female characters as objects of desire.

None of this undoes the show’s cultural impact. It simply means the show wasn’t perfect.

How It Changed Television

Beverly Hills, 90210 changed the way television approached young audiences. It proved that teenagers could watch a show about teenagers and still find it compelling. It showed that a network could build a show around a group of friends and make it a hit. It opened the door for the teen dramas that followed, from Dawson’s Creek to Gossip Girl.

The show also influenced fashion. Its characters wore clothes that felt both aspirational and accessible. The show made plaid shirts, leather jackets, and designer jeans feel like status symbols. It was a cultural force, even when its scripts were thin.

The Legacy That Endures

The show’s influence can be measured in countless ways. It created a template for teen drama that lasted decades. It gave actors their start. It made Los Angeles a destination for viewers around the world. And it gave its audience a place to belong, even if that place was fictional.

The show’s critics will point to its flaws. Its defenders will point to its heart. Both are right.

Aspect Strength Weakness
Ensemble casting Chemistry between leads Overreliance on stereotypes
Setting Iconic depiction of Beverly Hills Unrealistic portrayal of wealth
Writing Consistent formula Silly plots, over-dramatization
Cultural impact Broad appeal, fashion influence Controversial content

The show was not a masterpiece. It was a machine. It knew what it was doing, and it did it well. That’s enough to earn a solid score.

Beverly Hills, 90210 is a show that deserves credit for what it was: a cultural phenomenon that shaped a generation’s view of wealth, love, and celebrity. It was not a great show, but it was a significant one. The critical score reflects that balance.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

TV reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.