Clash of the Titans is a big-budget remake that treats ancient myth like a video game menu. Sam Worthington plays Perseus, a fisherman’s son plucked from obscurity to fight a dragon, a god, and eventually the Kraken itself. The movie is loud, dimly lit, and mostly indifferent to the characters it asks you to care about. It is also the kind of spectacle that critics tend to forgive, because spectacle is what it delivers, and spectacle is what it promises.
Trailer, via Warner Bros. UK & Ireland.
Sam Worthington’s Perseus
Worthington plays Perseus with the brooding intensity of a man who has been told he is the hero of the story and is still not sure why. His performance is adequate, but it lacks the charisma that made Jason Momoa’s version of Aquaman feel like a real person. He moves through the plot like a statue being pushed across a table, reacting to events rather than driving them. The script gives him no reason to believe in his destiny, so he cannot sell the audience on it either.
Perseus’ arc is simple: he is told he is fated to save humanity, he is reluctant, he is convinced by a prophecy, and then he fights. There is no moment where he earns his fate through skill or cunning. He is simply chosen, and the movie expects you to accept that.
Liam Neeson and Ralph Fiennes
Liam Neeson plays King Acrisius, the father of Danaë and the grandfather of Perseus. His performance is solid, but the character is a cipher. He is a king who makes a terrible prediction about his daughter’s child and then spends the rest of the film reacting to it. Neeson’s presence is a comfort, but it is a comfort that the script never quite knows what to do with.
The problem is not Neeson. The problem is that the script gives him no agency. He is a king who acts out of fear, but the fear is never explained, and his actions are never questioned. He is a prop in his own story, and that is a waste of a great actor.
Ralph Fiennes plays Hades, the god of the underworld. His performance is the highlight of the film. Fiennes brings a theatricality to the role that the material deserves. He is a villain who enjoys his power, who is amused by the mortals he manipulates, and who is genuinely terrifying when he decides to stop playing games. The problem is that the script does not give him enough to do. He spends most of the film plotting in the shadows, and his plans are never particularly clever.
Hades is a god, but the movie treats him like a businessman. He wants to bring the world into darkness, but the reasons are never made clear. He is a force of chaos, but he is not chaotic. He is methodical, calculating, and ultimately predictable. Fiennes elevates the material, but the material is thin.
Jason Flemyng’s Drakon and Gemma Arterton’s Io
Jason Flemyng plays Drakon, the first major obstacle in Perseus’ path. Drakon is a giant lizard creature that guards the entrance to the underworld. His role is simple: attack Perseus, get defeated, and die. Flemyng gives the character a sense of menace, but the menace is undercut by the fact that Drakon is clearly a computer-generated creation rather than a real threat. The fight is choreographed with style, but the stakes are low.
Drakon’s death comes quickly, and the movie moves on. There is no emotional weight to it, no sense that Perseus has lost anything. The underworld is a set piece, not a place. The monster is a toy, not a danger.
Gemma Arterton plays Io, the princess of Argos who is pursued by Medusa’s sisters. Her performance is competent, but her character is underwritten. She is a love interest who is captured, rescued, and then forgotten. The movie uses her to drive the plot forward, but it never explores what she thinks or feels. She is a pawn in a larger game, and the game is not interested in her.
Io’s capture is a turning point in the story, but the movie does not let her define it. She is a victim, and that is all. Arterton does what she can with the material, but the material is not generous. She is a beautiful object, not a person.
Richard Harris’s Zeus and The Kraken
Richard Harris plays Zeus, the king of the gods. His performance is warm and grandfatherly, but the character is a disappointment. Zeus is supposed to be the ultimate authority, but he is weak and indecisive. He allows his brother Hades to plot against him, and he seems powerless to stop him. The movie sets up a conflict between the two brothers, but it never delivers on it. Zeus is a figurehead, not a leader.
Harris brings dignity to the role, but the script strips it away. Zeus is a god, but he is a god who is being outmaneuvered. The movie suggests a struggle for power, but it never shows it. Zeus is a shadow of himself, and that is a letdown.
The Kraken is the final boss of the movie. It is a massive sea monster that is summoned by Hades to destroy Athens. The fight is the climax of the film, and it is a technical marvel. The Kraken is enormous, its movements are fluid, and its destruction is devastating. The problem is that the fight is empty. There is no tension, no stakes, and no payoff. The Kraken is a spectacle, not a story.
The movie builds to this moment, but it fails to deliver. The Kraken is a threat, but it is a threat that is resolved with ease. The final shot of the Kraken’s destruction is impressive, but it is hollow. The movie ends with a roar, but there is no resolution.
The Prophecy
The prophecy is the engine of the movie. It is the reason Perseus is chosen, the reason he is sent on his quest, and the reason everything happens. The problem is that the prophecy is never explained. It is a mystery that the movie does not solve. The characters talk about it, but they never understand it. The audience is left wondering what it means, and the movie offers no answer.
The prophecy is a plot device, not a character. It drives the story forward, but it does not deepen it. The movie is obsessed with fate, but it is not interested in meaning. The characters are puppets, and the prophecy is their puppeteer.
The Technical Craft
The visual effects are the strongest element of the movie. The dragons, the gods, and the underworld are rendered with impressive detail. The action sequences are choreographed with energy, and the cinematography is dark and moody. The score is bombastic, and the sound design is thunderous. On a purely technical level, the movie is polished.
But polish is not the same as quality. The movie is a showcase for effects, not a story. The visuals are beautiful, but they are empty. The action is exciting, but it is meaningless. The music is stirring, but it is background noise. The movie is a collection of images, not a narrative.
| Scene | Location | Tone |
|---|---|---|
| Opening | Argos | Dark, ominous |
| Drakon Fight | Underworld entrance | Menacing |
| Hades’ Lair | Underworld | Atmospheric |
| Athens | City streets | Desperate |
| Final Battle | Sea | Epic |
| Climax | Sky | Triumph |
The Verdict
Clash of the Titans is a failure of ambition. It is a movie that knows how to look expensive, but it does not know how to tell a story. The characters are flat, the plot is thin, and the themes are unexplored. The movie is a disappointment, and it is a disappointment that is easy to see coming.
The movie is not without merit. The performances are generally good, the effects are impressive, and the action is thrilling. But none of that is enough to save it. The movie is a monument to wasted potential, a reminder of what a great action movie could be if it cared about its characters.
The movie is a letdown, and it is a letdown that is hard to forget. It is a movie that you watch and then immediately want to forget. It is a movie that is worth seeing once, but not twice. It is a movie that is best enjoyed as a curiosity, not as a work of art.
The movie is a failure, and it is a failure that is worth studying. It is a reminder of the importance of craft, of the need to serve the story, and of the danger of letting spectacle overwhelm substance. The movie is a warning, and it is a warning that is easy to ignore.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
