ROBLOX. VIDEO GAMES. MOVIES. ORIGINAL ANIMATIONS.
CLAY TRIBUNE.
Advertisement

Danger Zone Review: A One-Trick Crash Toy That Knows Its Audience

Danger Zone is a Burnout Crash mode spin-off where you cause chain-reaction car crashes for points. A fun arcade toy that runs out of ideas fast.

By mitch·4 min read
A soldier holds his rifle amid smoke and flame within a narrow, dim arena.

Three Fields Entertainment’s Danger Zone wants you to crash for cash. The pitch, straight from the studio, is simple: cause the biggest car crash you can. It is a 3D vehicular destruction game, a genre the founders know well — they built the Crash mode in Burnout before striking out on their own.

A Virtual Crash Testing Facility

Danger Zone takes place in a virtual crash testing facility. You step into the shoes of a dangerous driver and work through roughly twenty scenarios, each stocked with parked or moving vehicles and other obstacles. The goal is points. You score them by driving your car into the scene — the “First Impact” — and setting off chain reactions of collisions.

The setup is directly inspired by Burnout’s Crash mode, and Three Fields does not hide it. If the First Impact does enough damage, you can trigger a “SmashBreaker” that explodes your vehicle and sets off more chain reactions. Points follow the degree of damage, with special points for unique targets and other scenario-specific goals. Online leaderboards rank the results.

Advertisement

Shunt, Smash, Repeat

The toolset is narrow on purpose. Shunt vehicles into oncoming traffic. Take down trailers to shed their payloads. Use the SmashBreaker to move your vehicle around. The more explosions you cause, the bigger your score. Bonus Pickups sit in the wreckage for players who can grab them.

It runs on Unreal Engine, and the studio sells the combination of real physical crashes with explosive gameplay. That is the whole game. There is no career to build, no car to tune, no story to sit through.

A Paradise for the Burnt-Out Commuter

The marketing leans hard on road rage. If you are burnt out by congestion and jammed roads, the studio suggests you take the highway to the Danger Zone and take your revenge on rush hour traffic. It calls the place a paradise for those who like their driving flame-grilled.

That framing is honest about what the game is: a pressure valve, not a simulation. Danger Zone is single player, played from a third-person view, and it is filed under racing, indie and arcade. The arcade label is the accurate one.

The concept is simple : crash for cash by creating the biggest car crash.

Where the Score Comes From

Danger Zone landed in May 2017 on PC and PlayStation 4, then reached Xbox One in October 2017. It drew a 6.4 out of 10 from the IGDB critic aggregate across nine outlets. That number sits exactly where the game does: competent, cheap, and thin.

The Burnout lineage is the strongest thing here and also the problem. Crash mode worked as a side attraction inside a larger racing game, a break between races. Danger Zone stretches that side attraction into a full release and asks it to carry the whole thing alone. Twenty scenarios of shunting and setting off the explosion is a fine afternoon. It is not much more.

The scoring system is the smart part. Special points for unique targets and scenario-specific goals push players past the obvious head-on collision and toward the stranger angles — the trailer that sheds its payload across three lanes, the pickup tucked behind the wreck you already made. Leaderboards give those scores somewhere to live, and the chase for a cleaner run is real.

The failure is variety. Every scenario asks the same question with different traffic. Once you have learned how the physics behaves — how a shunt carries into oncoming traffic, when the SmashBreaker is worth spending — the scenarios stop surprising you. The game never adds a new verb.

What 6.4 Buys You

Danger Zone is a small, well-made arcade toy with one good idea and no interest in a second one. The crashes feel right, the SmashBreaker is a satisfying button, and the leaderboards give the whole thing a spine. Nothing about it is broken. Nothing about it is surprising either.

The 6.4 is fair, and it is fair in a specific way: this is a game you enjoy for a weekend and then stop thinking about. Three Fields knew the Crash mode audience and built directly for it. That audience will get what it came for. Everyone else will notice how quickly the scenarios run out of new questions to ask.

Play it if the phrase “crash for cash” makes you smile. Skip it if you need the crash to mean something.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Game reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.