ROBLOX. VIDEO GAMES. MOVIES. ORIGINAL ANIMATIONS.
CLAY TRIBUNE.
Advertisement

DC Review: Lokesh Kanagaraj’s Lead Debut Anchors a Brutal, Borrowed Revenge Story

DC review: Lokesh Kanagaraj's first lead role anchors Arun Matheswaran's Devdas-meets-Bonnie and Clyde revenge film, now past ₹100 crore at the box office.

By mitch·7 min read
A man gazes into a shadowy room where a woman's figure seems to fade into memory.

Arun Matheswaran’s DC opens on a police weapons convoy and ends on a promise. In between, an outlaw named Devadas kills a corrupt inspector, falls in love with a singer, loses her to a commanding officer’s bullet, escapes custody, and meets a sex worker who looks exactly like the woman he buried. The film runs 142 minutes. It stars Lokesh Kanagaraj in his first lead role, alongside Wamiqa Gabbi and Sanjana Krishnamoorthy. Sun Pictures released it worldwide on 7 August 2026. It has grossed over ₹100 crore against a ₹25 crore budget, making it one of the highest-grossing Tamil films of the year.

Trailer, via Sun NXT.

Lokesh Kanagaraj Steps In Front of the Camera

Lokesh Kanagaraj is a director. He has spent his career building films for other people to stand inside. DC hands him the lead and asks whether the man who shapes Tamil action cinema can carry it on his face.

Advertisement

The answer is yes, and the film knows it. Das is written as a man of few gestures and fewer explanations. He kills his maternal uncles for murdering his mother over a family wealth dispute. His father, Motor Mani, disowns him for it. Lokesh plays that history without announcing it. The moral code is in the walk, the silence, the way he looks at a farmer’s family before he promises to pay for their son’s education out of stolen money.

It is a performance built on restraint, and it holds the film’s center when the plotting around it starts to strain.

A Story Borrowed From Devdas and Bonnie and Clyde

The title DC is an initialism for Das and Chandra. The film is inspired by Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay’s 1917 novel Devdas and by Bonnie and Clyde, the American outlaw duo. Both sources are visible, and neither is fully digested.

From Devdas comes the triangle: Das, the singer Parvathy, and the woman who arrives after her. From Bonnie and Clyde comes the outlaw alliance, the guns, the running. Matheswaran sets these against corrupt police officers and a system that fails the people it is meant to protect.

The result is a film that knows its references and mostly earns them. Where it stumbles is in the middle, where the lodge owner’s betrayal and the raid that follows arrive with too much machinery and too little air.

Parvathy, Chandra, and the Raid at the Lodge

The film’s best sequence is its cruelest. Das hides at a lodge, falls in love with Parvathy, and gets sold out when the lodge owner tips the police. The raid is chaos. Parvathy is accidentally shot. Then commanding officer Bhojaraj kills her anyway, to avoid being caught among the people shot in the crossfire.

Sanjana Krishnamoorthy has the smaller role and the harder job. Parvathy exists to be lost, and the film gives her just enough life that the loss lands.

Wamiqa Gabbi’s Chandra is the larger part. Das tracks the lodge owner to a brothel, kills him, and finds Chandra there — an exploited sex worker who resembles Parvathy closely enough to unmake him. He helps her escape. She joins him. The film’s synopsis calls their alliance turbulent, and that word does a lot of work.

Gabbi plays Chandra as someone who has already survived the worst and is not impressed by danger. The resemblance to Parvathy is the plot’s engine, but Gabbi never plays it as imitation. She plays it as a separate person the film keeps forcing into the same frame.

Anirudh Ravichander, Mukesh G, and Prasanna GK

The craft is where DC separates itself from the standard revenge film. Anirudh Ravichander’s music carries the emotional beats that the script sometimes skips. Mukesh G’s cinematography gives the brothel and the lodge distinct textures, so the film never feels like one long corridor. Prasanna GK’s editing keeps the action legible.

That legibility matters. The film has a dedicated police task force hunting Das’s gang, a stolen weapons convoy, an arms investigation, and a gang member named Sebastian killed in a raid with one of the stolen guns on him. That is a lot of plot, and the editing holds it together without letting it become a briefing.

The action sequences have drawn praise, and they deserve it. Matheswaran stages violence as consequence rather than spectacle, which is harder than it sounds and rarer than it should be.

The Supporting Cast Around Das

The film’s bench is deep. Kasthuri Raja, Thalaivasal Vijay, Krish Dayal, Avinash Raghudevan, Jawahar Sakthi, Sharath Ravi and Pranav Teophine fill out the world. Avinash Raghudevan’s Kitty, Jawahar Sakthi’s Karuppan, Sharath Ravi’s Chunnilal, Kasthoori Raja’s Sendhooran, Thalaivasal Vijay’s Arasu, Pranav Teophine’s Sebastian, Balaji Devi Prasad’s Ashraf, Sarah Christina Black’s Sarah and Bigil Siva’s Doctor each get a moment.

Not every one of them gets a full character. The gang is defined mostly by loyalty and by the fact that the police want them dead. That is enough for the film’s purposes, but it is also where DC leaves value on the table.

Here is what the film does well, ranked by how much it matters:

  1. Lokesh Kanagaraj’s lead performance, which anchors everything else.
  2. Wamiqa Gabbi’s Chandra, the film’s most complicated figure.
  3. Anirudh Ravichander’s score, which does the emotional work the script skips.
  4. The raid at the lodge, the film’s sharpest and most brutal sequence.
  5. The action staging, which treats violence as cost rather than decoration.
  6. The supporting cast, strong in aggregate but thin in individual detail.

The order is the argument. DC is a star vehicle that works because the star is doing something new, and a romance that works because one of its two women is written with real interiority.

Where DC Loses Its Grip

The film’s problem is the same one that afflicts most revenge stories built on a mistaken identity. Chandra resembles Parvathy. Das helps her because of it. The film wants that resemblance to mean something about grief and substitution, and it mostly does — but the plot keeps needing Chandra to be a plot device, and the character keeps resisting.

The middle section, from the arrest through the torture and the escape, is the weakest stretch. Das is tortured to reveal his gang’s whereabouts and the location of the stolen guns. He escapes to seek vengeance. The film moves through these beats efficiently, but efficiency is not the same as weight.

What DC gets right is the frame around all of it. This is a film about people the legal system failed, made by someone who understands that the failure is the point. Das delivers justice to those the law abandoned. The police answer with a task force. The farmer’s son gets an education paid for with robbery money. None of that is subtle, and none of it needs to be.

The film was announced in July 2025. Principal photography began that October in Chennai and wrapped in April 2026. It was written by Arun Matheswaran and Arun Ranjan. For a film assembled that quickly, DC arrives remarkably whole.

It is also, at 142 minutes, about fifteen minutes too long. The brothel escape and the task force sequences both repeat information the audience already has. Matheswaran trusts his images more than his script, which is usually the right instinct and occasionally the wrong one here.

The Verdict on DC

DC is a strong film with a clear identity and one genuine revelation. Lokesh Kanagaraj can act. That is the headline, and it is not a small one. A director of his stature stepping in front of the camera could have been a stunt. Instead it is the best thing in a film that has a lot of good things.

Gabbi is the other discovery. Chandra could have been a ghost with a pulse, and Gabbi makes her a person with a history and a temper. The film’s emotional climax belongs to her, not to Das, and it is stronger for it.

The ₹100 crore gross against a ₹25 crore budget is not surprising. This is a film built to be seen in a theatre, with a score that wants volume and action that wants a crowd. It is one of the highest-grossing Tamil films of 2026, and it earned that.

Where DC falls short is in the space between its best scenes. The Devdas and Bonnie and Clyde borrowings give it a shape, but the film does not always fill that shape with enough. The supporting cast is deep on paper and shallow on screen. The middle drags. The resemblance between Parvathy and Chandra is a strong idea that the plot keeps reducing to a mechanism.

None of that undoes the film. Matheswaran has made a revenge story with a pulse and a point of view, and he has gotten a career-best performance out of a first-time lead. DC is worth the ticket. It is not the best Tamil film of 2026, but it is one of the ones people will still be talking about when the year ends.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.