Schitt’s Creek ran for six seasons on CBC and Pop TV, and it is still the kind of show that gets pulled out as proof that comedy can be both smart and soft. The Rose family loses their fortune, buys a bankrupt town named Schitt’s Creek, and spend the next six seasons learning to live there. The show is a slow burn, and it earns that reputation honestly. It is not a laugh-a-minute sitcom, and it does not pretend otherwise. It is a show about grief, family, and the strange comfort of being somewhere you never asked to be.
The premise is simple. The Roses are rich beyond reason until a financial collapse strips them of everything except a small town they once bought as a joke. They move in, expecting to stay a few weeks and leave. They end up staying six seasons, and the show tracks their gradual acceptance of the place. Moira and Johnny Rose are played by Catherine O’Hara and Eugene Levy, and their chemistry carries the series from its first episode to its final scene. Their daughters, Alexis and David, are played by an ensemble cast, and their performances shift from spoiled brats to real people over the course of the show.
Trailer, via Schitt’s Creek.
Moira and Johnny
Moira and Johnny are the engine of the show. O’Hara plays Moira as a woman who has never had to think about money, and Levy plays Johnny as a man who has always been a con artist at heart. Together, they are the classic odd couple: she is high-strung and theatrical, he is laid-back and practical. Their scenes together are the best in the show, full of quiet jokes and unspoken history.
Alexis and David are less successful. Alexis is played by an ensemble cast, and her character spends most of the series as a selfish, entitled young woman. David is played by an ensemble cast, and his arc is slightly better, though both characters take a while to grow into people the audience can root for. The show’s early episodes lean heavily on their dysfunction, and that can be exhausting. But the later seasons find a way to make them likable, even as they remain flawed.
“You know what? I’m tired of being tired.”
That line, spoken by Moira in the first season, captures a central tension in the show. She is tired of being tired, and the show spends its runtime showing her working through that exhaustion. It is a simple idea, but it is repeated often enough to become a theme.
Schitt’s Creek and Its People
The town itself is the real star. It is a small, run-down place, and the show never pretends it is anything else. The citizens of Schitt’s Creek are played by a cast of recurring actors, and each one gets a moment to shine. Roland Schitt, played by David Therrien, runs the local diner and becomes a friend to the Roses. Jocelyn, played by Annie Murphy, owns the salon and has a crush on David. Pat, played by Derrick Adams, is the town’s resident oddball, and he becomes a friend to everyone.
These characters give the show its warmth. They are not caricatures, and they are not there to serve the Roses. They are people with their own lives, and the show treats them with respect. That respect is what makes the show work. The Roses could have been cruel to these townspeople, but they are not. Instead, they learn to care about the people around them.
The Writing Style
The show’s humor is understated. It is not a physical comedy, and it is not a joke-machine sitcom. It is a show that trusts its audience to get the subtlety. There are running gags, like Moira’s inability to understand American idioms, and there are one-liners, but they are delivered with a deadpan that takes patience to appreciate. The show rewards attention, and it punishes skimming.
The dialogue is sharp. The writers know how to set up a joke across multiple scenes, and they know how to pay it off with a punchline that lands after the audience has forgotten it was coming. That skill is rare in television, and it is one of the reasons the show holds up well on repeat viewing.
The Slow Burn Problem
The show’s slow pace is both its strength and its weakness. It takes its time, and that means some episodes feel padded. The first season, in particular, drags in its middle stretch. The Roses are not yet comfortable in Schitt’s Creek, and the show spends a lot of time showing them adjusting. That adjustment is necessary, but it is also slow.
The second season picks up the pace, and the show becomes funnier and more confident. The third season is where the show finds its stride. The fourth season is where the show starts to feel like a marathon. The fifth and sixth seasons are the strongest, and they are the ones that justify the earlier material. But the pacing issue never fully disappears, and it is a persistent complaint among viewers.
The Season Breakdown
| Season | Focus | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adjustment | Character introductions | Slow pacing |
| 2 | Comfort | Comedy improves | Some filler episodes |
| 3 | Growth | Strong arcs | Minor plot threads |
| 4 | Stasis | Town-building | Unnecessary subplots |
| 5 | Crisis | Best writing | Some tonal shifts |
| 6 | Resolution | Strong finale | Bittersweet ending |
The table shows the pattern clearly. The first three seasons build the world, and the last three resolve it. The middle seasons are where the show stumbles, and that is where the critical complaints land. But the show’s strengths are real, and they outweigh the weaknesses.
The Final Season
The sixth season is the show’s best work. It brings back old characters, raises the stakes, and delivers a finale that feels earned. The show ends on a note of hope, but it is a bittersweet hope. The Roses have changed, and the town has changed them. They are ready to leave, but they are also ready to miss it. That tension is what makes the ending work.
The show’s final episode is a masterclass in television storytelling. It resolves the main arcs, ties up the loose ends, and leaves the door open for a future. It is a happy ending, but it is not a perfect one. The Roses have learned to love Schitt’s Creek, and now they have to let it go.
The Critical Reception
Critics were divided on Schitt’s Creek. Some saw it as a gentle, well-written show that deserved more attention. Others found it too slow and too soft. The show’s IMDb score sits at 6.4 out of 10, which reflects that split. It is a solid show, but it is not a breakout hit.
That score is fair. The show is good, but it is not great. It is a show that rewards patience, and it is a show that punishes haste. It is a show that works best when watched at a steady pace, and it is a show that loses some of its magic when rushed. It is a show that deserves its audience, but it does not demand one.
The Town’s Legacy
Schitt’s Creek has become a cultural touchstone. It is a show that people remember fondly, even if they did not watch it religiously.
The show’s success is a tribute to the power of character-driven comedy. It is a show about people, not jokes. It is a show about family, not plots. It is a show about acceptance, not escape. Those themes are timeless, and they are why the show endures.
The show is worth watching, but it is not worth bingeing. It is a show that rewards a measured pace, and it is a show that loses some of its magic when rushed. It is a show that deserves its audience, but it does not demand one. It is a show that is better than its reputation, and it is a show that will be remembered fondly for years to come. It is a show that is worth watching, but it is not a show that demands your immediate attention. It is a show that is better than its reputation, and it is a show that will be remembered fondly for years to come.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
