Midterms 2026See who we think should earn your vote, based on our standardsThe guide →
WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
CLAY TRIBUNE.
Advertisement

Happy Gilmore Review: 400-Yard Swings, No Sense of Humor

A man with a great blow upon the green, whose fury and scorn bring laughter, yet leave little else behind.

By mitch·3 min read
A man with wild fury swings a club upon the green, scattering the grass before him.

Happy Gilmore is a comedy about a hockey player who hits golf balls 400 yards, and it never stops to explain why that should be funny. Adam Sandler plays Happy Gilmore, a man with a powerful swing that comes from his days on the ice. The movie wants you to laugh at his anger, his bad manners, and his refusal to follow the rules of the game. It mostly succeeds, but only because the stakes are so low.

Trailer, via Universal Pictures At Home.

The Setup

Happy Gilmore discovers he can hit a golf ball 400 yards after a fight with some movers who try to take his late grandfather’s old clubs. He enters the Waterbury Open, wins it, and earns a spot on the PGA Tour. Along the way, he picks up a coach in Chubbs Peterson, a homeless man named Otto as his caddy, and a romantic interest in Virginia Venit, the tour’s public relations director. His goal is simple: win enough money to save his grandmother’s house from foreclosure.

Advertisement

The Problem With Happy

Happy’s problem is that he is terrible at putting. He also yells at everyone, breaks clubs, and treats the course like a highway. The movie spends a lot of time showing him doing these things, and almost none explaining why they matter beyond the fact that they get him into trouble. The result is a comedy that feels more like a sketch stretched thin than a fully built story.

Shooter McGavin

Christopher McDonald plays Shooter McGavin, the arrogant star golfer who hates everything about Happy. Their fights are the engine of the movie, and they are the reason anyone watches past the opening credits. Shooter’s anger is real, and his hatred for Happy’s style is so complete that he becomes the villain the audience wants to beat.

Virginia Venit

Julie Bowen plays Virginia Venit, the tour’s public relations director who tries to calm Happy down. She becomes his romantic interest, and the movie leans on her to give Happy a reason to behave better. But the romance never quite lands, and the film spends more time on Happy’s tantrums than on their growing bond.

The Sequel

The movie was followed by a sequel, Happy Gilmore 2, which appeared on Netflix in 2025. That sequel brought back the characters and picked up where this one left off, though the original’s story is small enough that there was room to fill.

The Verdict

Happy Gilmore is a comedy that knows how to set up a joke and forgets to deliver one. The fights with Shooter McGavin are the best part, and they are the only reason the movie holds together. Everything else — the plot, the romance, the character arcs — is thin. It is a film that trades depth for volume, and the volume is not always enough to cover the cracks.

Here is how the two leads compare:

Character Role Strength
Happy Gilmore The lead, the hero Funny, driven, angry
Shooter McGavin The villain Angry, clever, memorable

The Numbers

  • Runtime: 92 minutes
  • Budget: $12 million
  • Gross: $41.4 million
  • Won an MTV Movie Award for Best Fight

Happy Gilmore is a movie that works in fits and starts. Its best moments are genuinely funny, but its worst moments are just plain dull. The sequel exists, which suggests the idea had staying power. This one does not.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.