ROBLOX. VIDEO GAMES. MOVIES. ORIGINAL ANIMATIONS.
CLAY TRIBUNE.
Advertisement

Rian Johnson’s Time-Travel Hit Man Story Is a Movie About Two Men Who Cannot Stand Each Other

Rian Johnson's Looper (2012) pits Joseph Gordon-Levitt against Bruce Willis as one man split in two, a time-travel thriller with a moral spine.

By mitch·5 min read
A man stands in a field awaiting a target while his older self approaches from the shadows.

Rian Johnson’s Looper arrived in 2012 with a premise that sounds like a paradox and plays like a chase. Time travel does not exist in 2044. It will exist in thirty years. That gap is the whole engine: the mob of 2074 needs bodies to vanish, so it drops its enemies into the past, where a hired gun called a looper is waiting with a blunderbuss and a silver payday. Joseph Gordon-Levitt is Joe, one of those guns. Bruce Willis is the older Joe sent back to be killed by his own younger self. Neither man is inclined to cooperate.

Trailer, via Sony Pictures Entertainment.

A Kansas City With Silver Bars and Blunderbusses

The film’s rules are clean and mean. Loopers kill the hooded, bound victims the syndicate sends back, then dispose of the bodies. Payment comes as silver bars strapped to the target. A looper who survives until 2074 gets closed out — his future self sent back for him to execute, marked with gold instead of silver. That is the contract’s end. Abe, played by Jeff Daniels, runs the operation in Kansas City, a man from the future managing men in the past with a cane and a temper.

Advertisement

Joe is good at the work and honest about why. He is getting rich. Life is good. Then his next target arrives with his face uncovered and his hands unbound, and the loop stops being a metaphor.

Old Joe Will Not Lie Down

The older Joe knocks his younger self out and runs. What follows is the film’s best structural gamble: Johnson shows us one timeline where Joe kills his target clean, moves to Shanghai, burns through his money on drugs and partying, becomes a hitman, and meets a wife played by Xu Qing. That life ends when the syndicate comes for her. The older Joe who escapes into 2044 is trying to rewrite that ending, and he will kill children to do it.

That is the fork the whole movie rests on, and it is not a gimmick. It is a moral argument between two versions of the same man, one who has lost nothing yet and one who has lost everything.

Seth, the Floor Safe, and the Gat Men

Before any of that, Johnson shows us the cost of the rules through Paul Dano’s Seth. Seth fails to kill his future self. Old Seth, played by Frank Brennan, escapes and warns him that a jawless telekinetic called the Rainmaker will overthrow the five major bosses and close every loop. Joe hides Seth in his apartment’s floor safe, then gives him up when Abe threatens to take half his silver.

“Hunted by your future, haunted by your past.”

The Gat Men take Seth. They carve an address into his arm and start removing pieces of him surgically, and the damage shows up on Old Seth’s body in real time. He follows the address on his arm and Kid Blue, played by Noah Segan, kills him. It is the film’s coldest sequence and its clearest statement of what the syndicate is.

Emily Blunt and the Farm

Joe’s fall off a fire escape lands him at a farm run by Sara, played by Emily Blunt, and her son Cid, played by Pierce Gagnon. Blunt gets the film’s hardest turn: a mother with a past she is not proud of, a shotgun, and a boy who may be more than he appears. The Rainmaker prophecy hangs over the farm, and Johnson lets the tension build slowly before the payoff.

The telekinesis thread is where Looper risks the most. In 2044 it is a party trick, a way to float a lighter for a laugh. By the end it is the film’s whole stake. That escalation is earned, mostly because Gagnon plays Cid without cuteness and Blunt plays Sara without sentiment.

Gordon-Levitt, Willis, and the Same Man Twice

Gordon-Levitt wears prosthetics and mimics Willis’s cadence, and the effect is stranger and better than it should be. He is not doing an impression. He is playing a man who has not yet become Willis, and the performance carries the film’s central question: what would you tell yourself, and would you listen?

Willis, for his part, gets the film’s simplest job and does it well. Old Joe is a man with a dead wife and a plan, and Willis plays the plan with a flat, tired menace that makes the farm sequences genuinely frightening.

What Looper Gets Right

Johnson wrote and directed Looper after Brick, and the leap in scale is obvious. Looper was selected as the opening film of the 2012 Toronto International Film Festival and released in the United States on September 28, 2012, through a partnership between TriStar Pictures and FilmDistrict. It grossed $176 million worldwide on a $30 million budget. That is a hit by any measure.

The film’s real achievement is that it uses time travel as a character device rather than a puzzle box. The paradoxes are there — the arm carving, the changing timeline — but Johnson never asks you to solve them. He asks you to watch two men who are the same man decide what they are willing to do.

The Rainmaker Thread and the Weak Spots

Here is what matters, ranked:

  1. The loop mechanic itself, which turns a contract killing into a suicide pact and gives the whole film its shape.
  2. Gordon-Levitt and Willis as one man split in two, which is the performance the movie lives or dies on.
  3. Emily Blunt and Pierce Gagnon on the farm, which is where the film stops being clever and starts being about something.
  4. The Rainmaker thread, which pays off but arrives late and leans hard on a child performance.

The weak spots are real. The middle stretch in Shanghai moves fast and skips the decade that made Old Joe, so his grief has to be taken on faith. The Gat Men are effective but thin. Kid Blue never becomes a character so much as a threat with a face.

None of that sinks it. Looper is a 118-minute action thriller with a science fiction spine and a genuine moral question at the center, and it holds together better than most films that try half as much. It is the rare time-travel movie that would still work if you removed the time travel and kept the men.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.