Orwell: Keeping an Eye on You puts players behind a desk, sorting through phone calls and emails from citizens in a surveillance state. The 2016 game, now available on Linux, Android, PC and iOS, asks players to make moral choices about who gets watched and who gets silenced. It is a game about bureaucracy, not spectacle, and that restraint is its strength.
Trailer, via GOG.
The Surveillance Desk
Players sit at a computer terminal, reading through case files, deciding which leads to follow and which to ignore. The game is built around a simple loop: read a document, make a call, write a report. There is no combat, no stealth, no dramatic chase scenes. What there is, instead, is a slow accumulation of power and responsibility.
The world of Orwell: Keeping an Eye on You is a thinly fictionalized version of Britain, and the government has just launched a mass surveillance program. Players work for the agency running it, sifting through data to find terrorists, criminals and political dissidents. The game tracks how players handle each case, and later stages let players see the consequences of earlier decisions.
Choice and Consequence
The central mechanic is choice, and the game tracks those choices over time. A player who reports a harmless joke as terrorism early on might find themselves managing a crackdown on free speech later. The game does not punish players harshly, but it does record. That recording creates a sense of weight to every decision.
The game also introduces a system of points, called “trust,” which rewards players for making the government look competent. This creates a tension: doing what feels right morally often costs trust points, while doing what the government wants increases them. It is a clever way to make the player feel caught between duty and career.
A Short Game With Long Weight
Orwell: Keeping an Eye on You is not a long game. It can be finished in a few hours, though replayability comes from the branching paths created by earlier choices. That brevity works in its favor. The game never overstays its welcome, and its ideas land harder for being delivered quickly.
The game’s writing is sharp and pointed. It does not lecture, but it does not soften its message either. Conversations with characters are brief and telling, and the documents players read are often funny, sad or both at once.
| Element | Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Writing | Sharp, pointed dialogue | Some documents feel thin |
| Mechanics | Simple, effective loop | No combat variety |
| Length | Short, focused | Limited replay value |
| Tone | Serious without being grim | Can feel cold |
The game’s weakness is its brevity. Some players will want more depth, more cases to solve, more branches to explore. The game’s replay value comes from seeing how different choices play out, but the core loop does not change much between playthroughs.
Final Word
Orwell: Keeping an Eye on You is a small game with a large idea. It asks players to think about privacy, power and the ethics of surveillance, and it does so without ever losing its focus. The writing is sharp, the mechanics are tight, and the moral questions it raises stick with players long after the credits roll.
The game is not for everyone. Those looking for action or spectacle will find little here. But for players interested in a thoughtful, quiet experience, Orwell: Keeping an Eye on You delivers.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
