WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
About
CLAY TRIBUNE.
ShopCartAccount
Advertisement

Sixteen Years On, Unbreakable Still Splits Its Twist Between Two Stories That Don’t Quite Match Up

A man walks from ruin unscathed, and a broken man believes him a hero — a tale of fate and the nature of the human soul.

By mitch·6 min read
A man walks alone from a wrecked train, smoke curling around him amid ruins.

Unbreakable opens with a train wreck. David Dunn (Bruce Willis) is the only survivor of a derailment that killed hundreds. He walks away with no injuries and no memory of how he escaped. The film then cuts to Elijah Price (Samuel L. Jackson), a comic book collector who believes he is the opposite of a hero — a broken man, a villain who can’t break bones. Price watches the news coverage of Dunn’s survival and sees something he calls a “synergy.” He believes Dunn is the real hero, the one figure whose strength and luck make him nearly impossible to kill.

That premise sounds simple. It isn’t. M. Night Shyamalan builds a conspiracy about fate, identity and the nature of heroes themselves. The film wants to be a thriller about a man who can’t die and a man who thinks he can’t live. It mostly succeeds at the first goal and stumbles at the second.

Trailer, via Film at Lincoln Center.

Advertisement

Dunn’s Survival

Willis plays Dunn as a man who doesn’t understand why he survived. He’s a construction worker with a wife and son, and his life is ordinary until the train crash. Afterward, he starts noticing strange things: his hands heal faster than normal, he can throw a punch that breaks a man’s nose without touching him, and he can move through a crowd without being touched. These powers don’t feel like gifts to him. They feel like a burden.

The film spends its first hour establishing Dunn’s world. His wife, Audrey (Robin Wright), is skeptical of his claims. His son, Joseph (Spencer Treat Clark), is fascinated by them. The script leans on domestic scenes to ground Dunn in reality before it pulls him into Price’s orbit. That grounding works. It makes the fantasy feel earned rather than dropped from nowhere.

Jackson plays Price as a man who knows he’s the villain. He collects comics about broken men, and he’s convinced that Dunn is the hero he’s been waiting for. Their relationship is the engine of the film. Price tells Dunn that he’s the opposite of a villain — a hero in disguise. Dunn doesn’t believe him. He thinks Price is a con man or a lunatic. The tension between them drives the plot forward.

“You’re the hero.”

The Twist

Unbreakable ends with a twist. The final scene reveals that the entire story has been a lie. Dunn is not a hero. He is a villain. Price is not a broken man. He is a hero. The film resets its own premise in the last ten minutes. This is the kind of ending that made Shyamalan famous. It is also the kind of ending that divides audiences.

Some viewers find the twist brilliant. Others find it hollow. The film spends two hours building a mythology about destiny and purpose, then tears it down in a single beat. That shift is bold. It is also abrupt.

The twist changes everything the audience thought they were watching. Dunn’s powers are explained in a way that undermines the whole film. Price’s obsession with comics is revealed to be a cover for something else entirely. The film asks the viewer to trust it, then betrays that trust. Whether that betrayal feels like a reward or a cheat depends on the individual.

Tone Problem

Unbreakable tries to balance three tones at once. It wants to be a family drama, a superhero thriller and a philosophical meditation. Those ambitions don’t always mesh. The film’s quieter moments, where Dunn talks to his wife about his fears, land well. Its action sequences, where Dunn fights attackers, feel rushed. The tone problem is the film’s biggest weakness.

Shyamalan’s direction is competent but unremarkable. He knows how to stage a reveal and how to build suspense. He doesn’t know how to handle the middle stretch of a story. The film drags in its second act, where Dunn investigates his abilities without finding much. The pacing sags in ways that a tighter script could have avoided.

Jackson’s Performance

Jackson carries the film. His Elijah Price is a man who has spent his entire life trying to prove himself. He’s desperate for validation, and he finds it in Dunn. Jackson sells the character’s desperation without ever crossing into caricature. He’s the reason the film’s central relationship holds together.

Willis is less successful. He plays Dunn as a man of few words, which works in some scenes but flattens others. Dunn needs more complexity to justify the film’s premise. As it stands, he’s a blank slate onto which the story projects its ideas. That’s a limitation of the writing, not of the acting.

Comic Book Mythology

Price’s fixation on comics is the film’s most interesting element. He collects stories about broken men, and he reads them for clues about his own condition. The film treats comics as a genuine source of insight, not just a hobby. That’s a refreshing approach. It also raises questions the film never fully answers.

Why does Price believe comics hold the truth? What does it mean that Dunn is the opposite of a broken man? The film hints at answers but never delivers them. It’s a missed opportunity. A deeper exploration of the mythological framework could have anchored the twist.

Final Act

The third act is where Unbreakable falters most. The twist is delivered with a single image, and the film moves on almost immediately. There’s no payoff for the setup. The audience is left to process the revelation on their own. That’s a structural problem, not a stylistic one.

The film’s final scenes are rushed. Dunn’s confrontation with Price feels like a placeholder rather than a climax. The resolution is tidy in a way that feels unsatisfying. The film sets up a question about destiny and purpose, then answers it with a shrug.

Legacy

Unbreakable is often cited as a precursor to Shyamalan’s later work. It shares themes with Signs and The Village — the idea of ordinary people discovering extraordinary abilities. That lineage is visible. The film’s influence is widely noted, though influence alone does not establish quality.

Unbreakable is a flawed but watchable film. It has a strong premise, a great performance from Jackson and a twist that still surprises. It also has a slow middle, a flat lead and a resolution that undersells its own setup. Taken as a whole, it’s a mixed bag.

The film’s best moments are its quiet ones. The scenes between Dunn and his wife, and the conversations between Dunn and Price, are where the movie finds its soul. The action is competent but forgettable. The philosophy is provocative but underdeveloped.

The Numbers

  • Title: Unbreakable
  • Director: M. Night Shyamalan
  • Release Year: 2000
  • Runtime: 106 minutes
  • IMDb Rating: 6.2/10

Unbreakable is a film that deserves its reputation for a reason. It’s not a masterpiece, but it’s a solid film. The twist is a highlight, and Jackson’s performance is a standout. The middle stretch drags, and the ending undercuts its own premise. Taken as a whole, it’s a film that’s worth watching but not essential viewing.

Score: 6.2 of 10.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.