“Wrath of Man” wants to be a lean, brutal thriller about a bank security guard who turns out to be a retired cop hunting criminals. It mostly succeeds at being lean. It rarely succeeds at being brutal.
The film follows Patrick Hughes as Leo, a quiet man who works as a security guard at a Los Angeles bank. He is also, unbeknownst to his coworkers, a former detective with a personal grudge against the criminal underworld. When a gang of robbers led by Chris Hemsworth’s Mitch and Hugh Jackman’s Martin target the bank, Leo sees his chance to settle old scores. The setup is simple and effective. The execution is less so.
Trailer, via Amazon MGM Studios.
Leo’s Grit vs. Leo’s Script
Hughes plays Leo as a man of few words and even fewer smiles. That restraint mostly works in the early scenes, where his calm demeanor contrasts sharply with the chaos around him. The problem is that the script keeps giving him reasons to break character. A chase scene, a confrontation, a confession — each one asks Hughes to let loose, and each one feels forced.
Jackman and Hemsworth fare better. Hemsworth’s Mitch is the smooth-talking leader of the gang, charming and confident. Jackman’s Martin is the more ruthless one, willing to hurt anyone who gets in his way. Together, they drive the plot forward with a chemistry that Hughes’s Leo can’t quite match.
The film is at its best when it focuses on the cat-and-mouse tension between the three men. A heist gone wrong, a hostage situation, a narrow escape — these moments crackle with energy. They just don’t land with the weight they should.
Where the Story Goes Wrong
The plot is built on a twist that should surprise. It doesn’t. The reveal that Leo is a retired cop comes early enough that the audience figures it out within minutes. From there, the film spends the rest of its runtime proving a point the audience already knows.
That structure is a problem, but it’s not the only one. The film also leans heavily on violence as a substitute for tension. Car chases, gunfights, and explosions fill the screen, but they don’t always serve the story. Some of them feel like padding, added to stretch out a runtime that could have been tighter.
The Chase Scenes That Work
Not all of the action sequences fall flat. A sequence involving a stolen car and a police pursuit is genuinely tense, thanks to precise editing and a sense of speed that carries the scene. Another scene, set in a crowded building, uses the environment to create genuine danger. These moments work because they’re grounded in the characters’ stakes rather than spectacle for its own sake.
But those successes are exceptions. The film as a whole is too quick to reach for a big explosion or a dramatic shot when a quieter beat would have served the story better.
Leo’s Limits
Hughes is a capable actor, but “Wrath of Man” asks him to do more than he can deliver. His performance is steady, sometimes even compelling, but it lacks the charisma that a lead actor needs to carry a thriller. He’s good at being a quiet force, but the script demands he be a loud one too, and that mismatch shows.
The supporting cast fares better. Hemsworth brings a magnetic presence to Mitch, and Jackman delivers a strong, menacing performance as Martin. Their scenes together are the film’s highlights, even when the plot around them sags.
A Bank Job That Runs Long
“Wrath of Man” is a solid, if uneven, thriller. It has a strong premise, decent performances, and a handful of well-executed action sequences. But it’s also a film that struggles to find its footing. The twist is obvious, the pacing is off, and the violence often substitutes for tension rather than building it.
The film’s strengths are real, but they’re scattered across a runtime that doesn’t always know what to do with them. It’s a movie that knows what it wants to be — a gritty, action-packed crime thriller — but it doesn’t fully commit to making that vision work.
The Verdict on Leo’s Story
“Wrath of Man” is a mixed bag. It has moments of real tension and some excellent performances, but it’s weighed down by a plot that telegraphs its twists and a script that can’t decide whether to be gritty or explosive. It’s worth watching for the action set pieces and the performances, but it’s not a film that holds together as a cohesive whole.
Here’s how the film’s elements rank:
- Action sequences — the car chase and the building scene — are the strongest parts of the film.
- Performances by Hemsworth and Jackman carry the middle sections.
- The premise is promising but the twist is obvious.
- Hughes’s performance is competent but limited.
- The pacing suffers from too much filler and too little focus.
Key Facts Box
– Title: Wrath of Man
– Director: Robert Swint
– Lead actors: Patrick Hughes, Chris Hemsworth, Hugh Jackman
– Genre: Action thriller
– Runtime: 109 minutes
– Score: 5.7/10
“Wrath of Man” is a film with potential and a film with problems. The action is often thrilling, the performances are strong, but the story never quite coheres the way it should. It’s a watchable movie, but it’s not a great one.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
