Viewers who have grown tired of big companies absorbing the streaming sites they cherish have begun pooling their funds to take full ownership of Letterboxd. For months, Tiny, the Canadian holding company with a controlling stake in Letterboxd, has been looking for buyers willing to take over the user-focused social media platform. That search has stirred up fear among users—and it would be hard to find anyone surprised by their reaction, given how nearly complete the Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery merger is and what the last few years have done to Twitter. A new effort from Intrinsic Entertainment Collaborative, a public benefit company, aims to turn that fear into action. The campaign, called Letterboxd4All, asks members of the Letterboxd community to band together and purchase the majority stake by putting in a minimum $100 investment for equity ownership on Wefunder or giving $1 or more through GoFundMe.
What the Campaign Wants
The goal is simple: community ownership. The campaign wants Letterboxd users to hold the majority stake themselves, rather than letting some other company buy it and turn it into a product to be sold.
Elizabeth Joyce, founder of Intrinsic, explained the logic to TheWrap. “The valuation of Letterboxd reflects the years of creative labor users have contributed to building the platform,” she said. “Our campaign is a reflection of people’s frustration at seeing value extracted from their communities. Our model offers communities the chance to be the owner, not the product.”
Why Fans Are Nervous
The consolidation of Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery has transformed the entertainment sector, while Twitter has endured a difficult period over the past several years. Together, those two events have convinced many Letterboxd users that corporate mergers and platform changes can happen without asking them for permission.
The frustration Joyce describes comes from users who believe they built the platform through their contributions, only to see that value extracted by outside interests. The campaign proposes a solution: it aims to halt that extraction and make the community itself the owner instead.
How the Crowdfunding Works
Two platforms carry the campaign. Wefunder is where people buy equity and become owners by paying a minimum of $100. GoFundMe is where anyone can give money starting at $1, with no ownership attached.
This method opens participation to nearly everyone. A person with $100 can put money in for a share of ownership. A person with $1 can contribute funds instead. The design allows every user who cares about Letterboxd to take part in keeping it independent.
What Happens Next
The outcome of the campaign rests upon the number of people who choose to take action. This kind of effort depends entirely on whether members of the community actually show up and participate.
The campaign’s case rests on a simple premise: the site was built by its users, and if enough of them want to preserve that identity, they can join forces and finance the purchase together.
Key Facts Box
| Platform | Role |
|---|---|
| Letterboxd | User-focused social media platform |
| Tiny | Canadian holding company with controlling stake |
| Intrinsic Entertainment Collaborative | Public benefit company behind the campaign |
| Wefunder | Equity investment platform for $100 minimum |
| GoFundMe | Donation platform for $1 or more |
Those who use Letterboxd the most are now acting as though they owned it, and they are fed up with watching companies merge and platforms change hands without being asked for permission. The irony lies in the fact that these users are the ones most invested in the site, yet they feel powerless over its direction.
The community has made its desires known, and it is prepared to spend money on them, according to Joyce’s campaign. The message is clear: the people understand what they want, and they are ready to put their money behind it.
The real test of whether it works remains open. What matters is that fans are now discussing purchasing a platform at all, which demonstrates just how much the landscape has shifted. Once, companies owned the platforms and users simply used them. Now, users are openly discussing owning the platforms for themselves.
The tale is slight, yet it carries a point worth considering. Rather than merely discussing the films they adore, movie enthusiasts are also speaking up about the platforms they employ to converse about them—and they are prepared to pay for those conversations.
See the video the story is built around at The A.V. Club.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.