WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
About
CLAY TRIBUNE.
ShopCartAccount
Advertisement

Dawn of the Dinosaurs Hands Over the Spotlight to Dinosaurs While the Rest Stalls

A mammoth's search for his lost brother leads him into a lost world of giants, where spectacle surpasses story.

By mitch·5 min read
A mammoth leads his companions through a verdant jungle where ancient reptiles lurk among the trees.

Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs opens with a simple premise: Manny, Sid, Diego, and Ellie head to the Lost World to rescue Ellie’s long-lost brother, Crash. That premise should carry a movie. Instead, it carries the weight of a franchise that has lost its footing.

The 2009 sequel is a bigger, louder version of what came before it, but it is also a thinner, more repetitive one. The jokes land less often. The stakes feel smaller. And the dinosaurs, which should be the draw, barely get a chance to breathe.

Trailer, via Rotten Tomatoes Classic Trailers.

Advertisement

Manny’s Long Walk Home

Manny, the mammoth, remains the heart of the film. His worry over losing Ellie is the emotional anchor, and the scene where he finally lets go of her hand is the rare moment of genuine feeling. But even his best lines feel borrowed from earlier installments. The script leans on his fear of abandonment instead of building new tension around it.

Sid, the sloth, gets a few good moments. He tries to impress the others with his knowledge of the jungle, and his attempts at being cool mostly miss. Diego, the saber-tooth tiger, is reduced to comic relief. His character arc is thin, and his scenes with the dinosaurs are the weakest parts of the film.

Ellie’s brother, Crash, is introduced late and never quite lands. The film spends too much time setting up his disappearance and too little time making him matter once he shows up. The payoff feels rushed, and the resolution is underwhelming.

The Lost World

The setting is the film’s biggest asset. The Lost World is a lush, dangerous jungle filled with towering trees and strange creatures. The animators clearly put effort into creating a vivid environment, and the action sequences benefit from the scale. A chase through a flooded valley and a battle with a giant snake are the film’s best set pieces.

But the world is also empty. There are few characters beyond the main group, and the supporting cast is thin. The film relies on Manny’s family to carry the entire story, which means the pacing drags in stretches where they simply walk from one danger to the next.

Dinosaurs as Spectacle

The dinosaurs are the film’s selling point, and they are the most disappointing element. A T-Rex, a Triceratops, and a Stegosaurus make brief appearances, but they are treated as obstacles rather than characters. The film’s marketing promised a clash between the Ice Age animals and the prehistoric beasts, but the actual interaction is minimal. Most of the dinosaurs are seen from a distance or in quick shots.

One sequence involving a baby dinosaur is the closest the film comes to blending the two worlds. It is a small victory, but it is buried in a runtime that could have used more of it.

The Voice Cast

The voice cast is the same as the previous films, and that familiarity is both a strength and a weakness. John Leguizamo voices Sid, Ray Romano voices Manny, Denis Leary voices Diego, and Queen Latifah voices Ellie. They all bring their established chemistry back, but the material they are working with is thinner. The dialogue is full of one-liners that land with a thud, and the pacing sags in the middle stretch.

The film also introduces a new character voiced by Josh Peck, who plays a young boy named Buck. Buck is meant to be a guide to the Lost World, but his presence is underused. He provides some comic relief, but he never becomes a meaningful addition to the group.

A Review of the Running Time

The film runs 96 minutes, and it feels longer. The middle third is slow, with repeated scenes of the group walking through the jungle while the dinosaurs lurk off-screen. The film tries to build suspense, but the setup is so familiar that the payoff loses its force. By the time the final act arrives, the audience has already forgotten why the stakes mattered.

The film’s biggest flaw is its failure to evolve. The first Ice Age film was a surprise hit because it found humor in a world of talking animals. This sequel feels like it is playing catch-up to that success, adding bigger set pieces and more dinosaurs without changing the core formula. The result is a film that is safe but unoriginal.

Comparing the Three Films

Film Setting Main Conflict Critical Reception
Ice Age (2002) Ice Age Manny’s search for his family Positive
Ice Age: The Meltdown (2006) Flooding Manny’s search for his family Positive
Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs (2009) Jungle Manny’s search for Ellie’s brother Mixed

The pattern is clear. Each film repeats the same basic plot, with Manny searching for his family or his friends. The settings change, but the structure stays the same. The first two films benefited from novelty. This one does not.

The Soundtrack

The music is forgettable. The score tries to build tension during the dinosaur sequences, but it mostly fades into background noise. The songs, performed by Chris Brown and Justin Guarini, are pleasant but generic. They do not add anything to the film, and they are quickly forgotten after the credits roll.

A Final Word on the Sequels

The film is not a disaster. It is competent, occasionally funny, and visually impressive. But it is also a step down from what came before it. The jokes are weaker, the characters are thinner, and the dinosaurs are a tease. It is a film that knows its own strengths and still fails to capitalize on them.

For fans of the series, the film is a mixed bag. It delivers a few good laughs and a couple of strong action sequences, but it falls short of the original films. For newcomers, it is a solid but unnecessary entry point. The story is easy to follow, but it lacks the spark that made the first two films memorable.

A Score Worth Saying

Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs is a film that is bigger in scope but smaller in spirit. It is a disappointment for those who wanted more from the franchise, and a passable watch for those who just want a distraction. The film’s technical achievements are real, but its storytelling is not.

The score is 5.0 out of 10.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.