Armageddon is a movie about saving the world, and it spends almost two hours proving that saving the world is easier than making a movie about it. The premise is simple: a comet is headed toward Earth, and NASA needs a team of oil drillers to plant nuclear charges deep inside it. The drillers, led by Bruce Willis, get the job done, but not before the film has to stop for a few minutes of family drama, a montage of men being men, and a speech about the meaning of life. The result is a disaster movie that treats its own spectacle as an excuse to talk about everything else.
Trailer, via CriterionTrailers.
The Drill Team
The film opens with a prologue set in 1959, when a meteorite crashes into the Gulf of Mexico. A young boy named Rock Hudson Jr., played by Paul Walker, witnesses the impact and decides he wants to be an astronaut. That story runs parallel to the main plot, which follows the present-day team of drillers assembled by Willis’s character, Harry Stamper. The drillers are a ragtag group of roughnecks who know oil rigs better than they know space exploration. Their leader is a former NASA astronaut turned oil rig owner, and he brings them together because he believes they can do what NASA can’t: drill into a comet.
The drill team is the heart of the film, and the actors play their roles with varying degrees of commitment. Ben Affleck plays the tech-savvy member of the team, and his scenes are the closest the movie comes to having a coherent character arc. Steve Buscemi plays the team’s comic relief, and his performance is the most memorable part of the film. Billy Bob Thornton plays the gruff, no-nonsense drill instructor, and his scenes with Willis crackle with tension. The rest of the cast fills out the ensemble with a mix of competence and typecasting.
Walker plays the young boy from the prologue as an adult, and his role is meant to be the emotional center of the film. He is supposed to represent the future, the hope that the drillers are fighting for. In practice, his scenes feel like padding. The film keeps returning to him, but the story never quite knows what to do with him. He is a symbol, not a character.
Willis and the Lead Role
Bruce Willis plays Harry Stamper with the kind of intensity that made him a star in the mid-1990s. He is the calm center of the chaos, the man who knows what he is doing even when everyone else is panicking. His scenes with the other drillers are the best in the film, because they let him act without having to explain the plot to the audience. When he is talking to the drillers about the job, the film feels alive.
But the film keeps pulling him away from the drill team to make room for a subplot involving his daughter, played by Liv Tyler. She is a nurse, and she is angry at her father for leaving her behind while he goes on the mission. The film wants to show that the drillers are not just workers, they are people with families. That is a noble impulse, but it gets in the way of the story. The drill team is a unit, and the film keeps splitting it apart to focus on individual relationships.
Willis is good enough to carry the film through those moments, but the script does not give him much to work with. He is told to be stoic, to be a leader, and to deliver a speech about the value of human life. Those are fine things for a lead actor to do, but they are not the same as writing a character. Willis is a professional, and he delivers the lines, but the lines themselves are thin.
The Science and the Comet
The science in Armageddon is bad, and the film knows it. There is a scene where a scientist explains the plan to the president, and he says that the drillers need to go down three miles into the comet to reach its core. That distance is physically impossible for a drill rig, and the film does not bother to hide the fact. It is a problem that could have been fixed with a five-minute research call, but the filmmakers chose to ignore it.
The comet itself is a plot device, not a character. It moves across the screen with a slow, steady menace, but it never feels like a real threat. The film shows it as a glowing rock, and that is all it ever is. There is no sense of scale, no sense of danger. The drillers climb aboard it, and the film treats it as a platform for action sequences, not as a genuine hazard.
The film also includes a subplot about a second comet, one that is too small to be destroyed by the nuclear charges. This comet is meant to hit the moon, and the film suggests that it will cause a catastrophic collision. That subplot is abandoned halfway through the film, and the movie never explains what happens to the moon or to the people on Earth who might have been affected by the collision. It is a dangling thread, and it leaves the film feeling unfinished.
The Family Drama
The film’s biggest weakness is its handling of the family subplot. Willis’s daughter is angry at him for leaving, and the film spends a lot of time showing her grief. There is a scene where she watches a video of her father talking to the drill team, and she cries. There is a scene where she calls him on the radio and tells him she loves him. These scenes are meant to be touching, but they are not. They are manipulative, and they break the tension of the disaster.
The film also includes a subplot about the drillers’ families back on Earth. One of the drillers has a wife who is pregnant, and the film shows her waiting for news. Another has a son who is worried about his father. These subplots are similar to the Willis-Tyler storyline, and they suffer from the same problem: they are not integrated into the main plot. They are separate stories, and they are presented as if they matter, but they do not.
The film’s attempt to balance spectacle with emotion fails because the emotion is artificial. The characters do not feel like people, they feel like placeholders for feelings. The drillers are supposed to be heroes, but the film keeps reminding us that they are also fathers, husbands, and sons. That duality is meant to make them relatable, but it just makes them inconsistent. One minute they are climbing a comet, the next they are crying on the phone.
The Action Sequences
The action in Armageddon is the film’s strongest element, and it is the reason anyone watches it. The drillers climb the comet in a sequence that is tense and exciting, and the film uses its budget to create a sense of scale. The effects are dated now, but they were impressive in 1998. The drillers move across the comet’s surface, and the film captures the danger of their position.
There is also a sequence where the drillers are attacked by a storm on the comet. The film uses this sequence to show the drillers working together, and it is one of the best parts of the movie. The drillers are skilled, and they are brave, and the film lets them be both. That sequence is a reminder of what the film could have been if it had focused on the drill team instead of the families.
The film also includes a sequence where the drillers plant the nuclear charges. That sequence is the climax of the movie, and it is handled with a sense of weight. The drillers know what they are doing, and the film respects that knowledge. It is a moment of tension, and it is resolved with a sense of finality.
The Message
The message of Armageddon is that humanity is worth saving. The film is unambiguous about this. The drillers are not saving the planet because it is their job, they are saving it because it is home to their families. That message is delivered in a speech at the end of the film, and it is sincere. The film believes what it is saying, and that sincerity carries some weight.
But the message is undermined by the film’s own contradictions. The drillers are supposed to be ordinary men, but they are also astronauts, oil rig owners, and leaders. The film wants to say that anyone can be a hero, but it keeps giving the heroism to the people who are already special. The ordinary men are there to be rescued, not to rescue.
The film also has a problem with its vision of the future. The drillers are saving the world, but the film does not show what comes next. There is no scene of the survivors rebuilding, no scene of the families coming together. The film ends with the comet exploding, and then it cuts to black. That ending is abrupt, and it leaves the audience wondering what happened to the people who survived.
The Final Score
Armageddon is a film with a good idea and a bad execution. It is a disaster movie that wants to be a family drama, and it cannot decide which one to be. The drillers are the best part of the film, and the action sequences are the most exciting. But the family subplots drag the film down, and the science is laughable.
The film’s score is 4.2 out of 10, and that score is fair. It is a flawed movie with a few strong elements, but the flaws are significant enough to outweigh the strengths. It is a film that is worth watching for the action and the performances, but it is not a film that rewards repeat viewings.
If you want to see a disaster movie that takes its premise seriously, there are better options. If you want to see a family drama that respects its characters, there are better options. Armageddon is neither. It is a film that tries to do both, and it fails at both.
Key Facts
- Title: Armageddon
- Year: 1998
- Director: Michael Bay
- Runtime: 149 minutes
- Score: 4.2 out of 10
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
