Americans are worried about data centers, and they want the government to do something about them. A new poll finds that 53% of adults are “extremely” or “very” concerned about the environmental effects of artificial intelligence data centers, up from 41% last year. That concern cuts across party lines, and it shows up in the numbers.
Two-thirds of Democrats are “extremely” or “very” concerned about AI’s environmental impact, up from about half in 2025. About half of independents and about 4 in 10 Republicans share the same worry. The poll also found that about 6 in 10 Americans support limiting the number of new data centers that can be built, and two-thirds of U.S. adults support requiring data centers to use clean energy sources like wind or solar.
The numbers are striking because data centers are not exactly top-of-mind for most voters. They sit behind the scenes, processing requests, storing files, and training models. But the appetite for AI is growing, and so is the infrastructure that powers it. The question now is whether that appetite can be tempered by regulation.
Numbers Behind the Concern
The poll results are part of a broader picture. Data centers are sprawling, power-hungry buildings that house the servers that keep the internet running. They store everything from social media posts to corporate records to machine learning models. And they are getting bigger.
According to Pew Research, 87% of existing data centers are located in urban areas. Most new ones, however, are planned for rural areas. That shift matters for local communities, which face the costs and benefits of hosting these facilities. The move from cities to rural regions means the environmental and economic impacts are spreading beyond the usual tech hubs.
The top contenders for new data center locations include Virginia and Texas, which already have the most facilities currently in operation. California, Ohio, and New York round out the list of states with significant data center activity. These states are already feeling the strain of data center growth, and the polling suggests voters are watching closely.
The scale of the problem is hard to grasp. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory estimates that data centers could account for 11.8% of U.S. electricity consumption by 2030. That figure is a projection, not a guarantee.
The environmental footprint of data centers is already substantial. A UN report found that data centers’ environmental footprint already rivals some of the world’s largest countries and will grow rapidly with wider AI adoption. That comparison puts the issue in stark terms.
Polling Numbers at a Glance
- Concern about AI’s environmental impact: 53% “extremely” or “very” concerned, up from 41% last year
- Democrats: Two-thirds “extremely” or “very” concerned, up from about half in 2025
- Independents: About half “extremely” or “very” concerned
- Republicans: About 4 in 10 “extremely” or “very” concerned
- Support for limiting new data centers: About 6 in 10 Americans
- Support for clean energy requirements: Two-thirds of U.S. adults
- Data centers in urban areas: 87%
- New data centers planned: Mostly rural areas
- Top locations: Virginia, Texas, California, Ohio, New York
- Electricity consumption by 2030: 11.8% of U.S. total (Berkeley Lab)
What Data Centers Actually Use
The concerns are not abstract. Data centers require vast amounts of power, and they raise questions about where that power comes from. Electricity is the obvious one. Large data centers can consume megawatts of power continuously, and that demand strains local grids.
Water is another issue. Data centers use water for cooling systems, and the demand is locally decisive. According to Fengqi You of Cornell, the national water demand from data centers is modest, but the local impact is significant. A data center in a dry region can strain local water supplies, and the effects ripple through farming and other industries.
The combination of power and water makes data centers a visible target for voters. When a community sees a new facility approved, it knows the consequences will hit soon. The polling reflects that awareness.
Meat production and air travel are only about 3 in 10 U.S. adults are highly concerned about their environmental impact. Those sectors have been targeted for years, and the public has grown used to the conversation. Data centers are newer to the conversation, and the polling suggests they are catching up fast.
Public’s View on Regulation
The polling shows strong support for regulation. About 6 in 10 Americans want limits on the number of new data centers that can be built. Two-thirds of U.S. adults support requiring data centers to use clean energy sources like wind or solar. That is a broad coalition, and it cuts across party lines.
The support is not just symbolic. Voters are willing to accept limits on a sector that drives the economy.
Experts Weigh In
The polling is backed by expert research. The Berkeley Lab estimate comes from a credible source, and the UN report adds weight to the concern.
Michael Greenstone, of the University of Chicago, put it bluntly: “We’re undertaking a massive experiment in real time, and I don’t think there’ll be any putting the milk back in the bottle.” His words capture the urgency of the situation.
Nancy Antunes, a retired Democrat from Waltham, Mass., offered a more personal perspective. She said, “I think that decisions are being made for the company, not for the community that they’re being built in.” Her comment points to the tension between corporate profit and local cost. Communities bear the burden of data center expansion, but they often lack the leverage to resist.
Gedeon Kebede, a 21-year-old computer science student, raised the water issue directly. He said, “There’s a lot of water usage by AI data centers that’s taking away from other things like agriculture and farmers and places that really need it.” His observation connects the technical details to real-world consequences. Data centers are not just servers; they are competing for resources that families and farms depend on.
These voices represent different perspectives, but they share a common theme: the costs of data center expansion are not evenly distributed. Companies benefit from cheaper computing, but the costs fall on local communities and natural resources.
Political Context
The poll’s timing matters. Midterm elections are approaching, and candidates are looking for issues that resonate with voters. Environmental concerns are not typically the first issue on a voter’s mind, but the polling shows they are increasingly salient.
The bipartisan concern is notable. Republicans and Democrats are both worried about the same thing, which makes this an unusual alignment. The issue is not about ideology; it is about the physical world. Data centers are everywhere, and they are getting bigger.
The policy implications are straightforward. If voters want limits on data center growth, and they want clean energy requirements, the pressure is on lawmakers to act. The polling suggests that the public is ready for action, and the experts are warning about the consequences of inaction.
Real Stakes
The polling reflects a genuine shift in public consciousness. People are noticing the data centers around them, and they are connecting those buildings to the environmental problems they see elsewhere. The concern is real, and it is growing.
The issue is not going away. Data centers are becoming a larger share of the economy, and their environmental footprint is growing. The Berkeley Lab estimate of 11.8% of U.S. electricity consumption by 2030 is a projection, not a guarantee, but it is a warning. The world is undertaking a massive experiment, and the milk cannot be put back in the bottle.
The polling shows that Americans are worried about AI data centers and want the government to do something about them. The question is whether that worry translates into action. The public has spoken; now the government must listen.
Where the paper stands
The paper backs narrow rules aimed at direct harm, like forcing disclosure of hidden safety failures, and is against broad rules that would lock out small businesses and raise the cost of entry for new challengers. The polling shows Americans want limits on new data centers and clean energy requirements, but the paper warns against rules that would entrench the biggest firms and freeze today’s leaders in place.
Data centers are power-hungry buildings that sit behind the scenes, and voters are right to notice them. But the paper does not want the government to treat the industry as if it were a single entity, run by a few large companies.
The paper’s position is that regulation usually protects the biggest players and raises the cost of entry for small ones. Broad limits on data center construction and clean energy mandates could push smaller operators toward the margins, leaving only the largest firms able to meet the compliance costs. That is the danger of a moat, not a safeguard.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.