WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
About
CLAY TRIBUNE.
ShopCartAccount
Advertisement

Chris Hemsworth Anchors a Bloated Whaling Epic in ‘In the Heart of the Sea’

A review of In the Heart of the Sea, a bloated whaling drama that never commits to a single tone or pace.

By mitch·6 min read
A whaleship is struck by a massive whale amid a raging sea.

In the Heart of the Sea tells the story behind Moby-Dick. It follows the crew of the whaleship Essex, who set out to hunt whales in 1819 and met disaster instead. The film stars Chris Hemsworth as First Mate Owen Chase, Benjamin Walker as Captain George Pollard Jr., and Cillian Murphy as the ship’s owner, George Coffin. The movie is based on Nathaniel Philbrick’s nonfiction book In the Heart of the Sea: The Real Story of the Whale That Attacked the Whale Ship Essex.

The premise is strong. A whaling vessel gets destroyed by a whale, leaving the crew drifting in open water. That should make for a gripping drama. Instead, the film stumbles badly, weighed down by a script that cannot decide whether it wants to be a tense survival tale or a slow character study. The result is a bloated, unfocused mess that drags its 136-minute runtime out until it collapses under its own weight.

Trailer, via Warner Bros..

Advertisement

The Whale Attack That Should Carry the Film

The Essex’s encounter with the whale is the film’s strongest sequence. Director Ron Howard stages the collision with a sense of scale that few other films manage, showing the sheer force of a 60-foot creature smashing into a wooden ship. The practical effects are used sparingly but effectively, letting the actors sell the terror rather than relying on CGI spectacle. Hemsworth in particular carries the physical weight of the moment, his face contorting with fear as the ship begins to break apart.

But the attack itself is only the beginning. What follows is a slow, painful descent into starvation, dehydration, and madness. The film spends far too much time on the aftermath, stretching out scenes of the crew rationing food, arguing over who should die first, and watching each other waste away. This is the material that could have made the film memorable. Instead, it becomes a chore to sit through.

Hemsworth’s Chase and the Rest of the Cast

Chris Hemsworth gives the best performance in the film as First Mate Owen Chase. He plays Chase as a man of duty, loyal to his captain but also terrified of the sea and the creatures that live in it. His early scenes, particularly those with Benjamin Walker’s Captain Pollard, crackle with tension. The two men respect each other, but Chase knows that Pollard is unfit to command a ship. Hemsworth sells this conflict without ever overplaying it, grounding the film’s larger ambitions in human stakes.

Benjamin Walker is less successful as Captain Pollard. He plays the young captain as a nervous, inexperienced leader who is deeply attached to the ship and its crew. The problem is that the script gives him no arc. Pollard remains static throughout, unable to make decisions or inspire his men. Walker’s performance is competent, but he is left with little to work with beyond a few brief moments of panic.

Cillian Murphy rounds out the lead trio as George Coffin, the ship’s owner. Murphy plays Coffin as a shrewd businessman who cares more about profit than the lives of the sailors he employs. This is a promising setup, but the film barely uses it. Murphy is relegated to a handful of scenes at the beginning and end, and his character feels like a footnote rather than a central figure.

The Script’s Biggest Problem

The film’s biggest flaw is its refusal to commit to a single tone. It opens with a flashback to Chase’s childhood, complete with a young version of himself played by a child actor. Then it jumps forward to the present day, where the crew sets sail. This structure is confusing, and it doesn’t help that the flashbacks are poorly integrated with the main narrative.

The film also struggles with pacing. The first hour moves at a crawl, spending far too much time on the mundane details of whaling life: the harpoons, the blubber rendering, the daily routines. By the time the whale attacks, the audience has lost patience. The second half picks up slightly, but the payoff is underwhelming. The film’s ending is abrupt, almost as if Howard ran out of ideas and decided to wrap things up quickly.

Here is a rough breakdown of the film’s structure:

  • The first act covers the crew’s preparations, the departure from port, and the early days at sea.
  • The middle act focuses on the encounter with the whale and the sinking of the Essex.
  • The final act follows the crew’s struggle to survive in the lifeboats, culminating in their rescue.

What Works and What Doesn’t

The film is not a total failure. There are moments of genuine tension, particularly during the whale attack and the immediate aftermath. The cinematography is often beautiful, with shots of the open ocean that capture the vastness of the Pacific. The sound design is effective, with the creaking of the ship and the distant calls of whales creating a sense of dread.

But these strengths are overwhelmed by the film’s structural problems. The pacing is uneven, the character arcs are thin, and the dialogue is often clunky. The film tries to say too much about whaling history, the nature of man, and the legacy of the Moby-Dick story. None of it lands.

The film also fails to deliver a satisfying conclusion. After nearly two hours of suffering, the final scenes feel rushed and anticlimactic. The film ends with a brief epilogue that attempts to tie everything together, but it feels like a bandage over a wound that won’t heal.

The Verdict

In the Heart of the Sea is a frustrating film. It has the potential to be a great story, but the execution is weak. The cast is talented, the premise is compelling, and the direction is competent. None of that is enough to overcome the script’s fundamental flaws.

The film is currently available for rental on Amazon Prime Video for $4.99. It is also available to stream on HBO Max, Hulu, and Google Play Movies.

  • Runtime: 136 minutes
  • Release Year: 2015
  • Director: Ron Howard
  • Score: 4.7/10

This is a film that will appeal to fans of historical dramas and nautical adventures, but it will disappoint anyone looking for a tight, well-paced story. The whale attack is worth seeing, but the rest of the film is a slog. It is a film that is best avoided unless you are a completist or a fan of the actors involved.

The film’s failure is not a mystery. It is a case study in what happens when a filmmaker tries to do too much. Ron Howard wanted to make a film about survival, a film about whaling, and a film about the origins of Moby-Dick. He ended up making a film that does none of those things justice. The result is a bloated, unfocused mess that wastes the talents of its cast and the promise of its premise.

4.7 of 10.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.