Death on the Nile is a film about a cruise ship, a dead woman, and a detective who insists he can solve the case. It is also, at times, a film about a man in a bowler hat who will not stop talking. Kenneth Branagh plays Hercule Poirot, and he plays him as if the character were a walking argument for why Agatha Christie’s books work better on the page than on screen.
The premise is simple. A wealthy heiress named Linnet Ridgeway (Gal Gadot) is found dead aboard a Nile cruise ship, and Poirot is summoned to investigate. The cast is large, the suspects are many, and the plot turns on a locked room, a hidden staircase, and a series of lies that everyone involved seems willing to maintain. The film wants to be a puzzle box, and it is a puzzle box with a cracked lid.
Trailer, via 20th Century Studios.
The Cast
The supporting cast is strong. Armie Hammer plays Simon Doyle, the fiancé who may or may not have a motive. Emma Mackey plays Jacqueline de Bellefort, whose love for Simon drives much of the early tension. Daisy Ridley plays Rosalie Ottrill, a nurse with secrets of her own. The ensemble is large enough to feel crowded, but each actor gets a moment to shine.
Branagh directs with a steady hand, and his performance as Poirot is the film’s center. He is confident, precise, and utterly unbothered by the chaos around him. The problem is that the script asks him to explain everything out loud. Poirot’s deductions are delivered as monologues, and the film loses momentum whenever the camera stops moving and the detective starts talking.
The Setting
The Nile setting is beautiful. The film opens with a sweeping aerial shot of the river, and the production design captures the grandeur of the cruise ship. The interiors are lavish, the exteriors are sunlit, and the whole thing looks expensive. That is not a small thing. Many adaptations of Christie’s work look cheap; this one does not.
But the setting also works against the story. The ship is too big, the spaces too open, and the mystery feels diluted in rooms where everyone could have committed the crime. The locked-room motif, which is central to the book, becomes a visual joke on screen. A locked room is hard to stage, and the film finds ways around it that feel less clever than expedient.
The Pacing
The middle section drags. The film spends a long stretch establishing the relationships between the passengers, and the exposition grows heavy. Characters speak their feelings aloud, often in ways that strain credulity. A love triangle is explained through dialogue rather than behavior, and the result is a story that feels more like a lecture than a thriller.
The final act picks up, and the reveal is satisfying. The killer is caught, the method is explained, and the moral weight of the crime lands. But the resolution arrives after the audience has lost some patience. The film is too long for its own good, and it does not trust the audience to remember details from earlier scenes.
The Music
The score is competent. It swells during tense moments, it hums during romantic ones, and it retreats during the quiet investigative stretches. It does not distract, but it does not add much either. The music follows the action rather than driving it.
“It is a curious thing, how often a crime is solved by chance.”
That line, spoken by Poirot, sums up the film’s approach to detection. The solution is not found through deduction but through luck. The film is full of clues, but it is also full of red herrings, and the audience is left to sort through them without much help.
The Dialogue
The dialogue is often on-the-nose. Characters state their motives and feelings directly, and the film leans on exposition to move the story forward. This is a problem because it removes the mystery from the mystery. When the characters tell you what they want, there is little reason to guess.
The best dialogue comes from the actors themselves, not from the script. The chemistry between the leads carries scenes that the writing should have carried on its own.
The Final Verdict
Death on the Nile is a handsome, sometimes thrilling adaptation of a beloved novel. It is also a film that trusts its audience to do half the work. The pacing is uneven, the middle section is slow, and the dialogue is often on-the-nose. It is not a bad movie, but it is a forgettable one.
The best scenes are the ones that let the actors breathe. The worst are the ones that force Poirot to talk. The film is a mixed bag, and it knows it.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
