Babel opens with a rifle changing hands in the Moroccan desert, and for the next 143 minutes Alejandro G. Iñárritu never lets the audience forget how far a single object can travel. The 2006 psychological drama, written by Guillermo Arriaga, braids four stories across Morocco, Japan, Mexico and the United States. A married couple’s vacation collapses into violence. A deaf teenager in Tokyo fights for connection. A housekeeper takes two American children across a border she cannot talk her way back through.
The film completes what Arriaga and Iñárritu called their Death Trilogy, after Amores perros in 2000 and 21 Grams in 2003. Babel is the biggest and the most scattered of the three. It is also the one where the method starts to show its seams.
Trailer, via Paramount Movies.
A Rifle in the Moroccan Desert
The inciting incident is simple and brutal. Tragedy strikes Richard and Susan Jones, played by Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett, while they are vacationing in the Moroccan desert. That event pulls in four different families and never loosens its grip.
Iñárritu and Arriaga do not tell any of it in order. The stories are not linear or chronological, and the audience learns how the plots connect only as the movie unfolds. That withholding is the engine. It is also the film’s biggest gamble, because a puzzle can only surprise you once.
Pitt and Blanchett are the marquee names, and they are used sparingly. Pitt backed out of a role in The Departed, which he produced, to make Babel. That decision reads as a statement of intent: this was the film he wanted on his record.
Chieko and the Tokyo Storyline
The strongest thread belongs to Rinko Kikuchi as Chieko, a deaf teenager in Tokyo. Kikuchi was 23 when she auditioned in July 2004, and 24 when filming began. Iñárritu was surprised by her talent but reluctant because she was not deaf. The search continued through hundreds of actresses over nine months. Kikuchi won the role in April 2005, a week before cameras rolled.
That backstory matters because the performance is the one thing in Babel that never feels like a construction. At the volleyball match in Tokyo, most of the spectators were played by deaf people. The choice gives the sequence a texture the rest of the film struggles to match.
Kikuchi earned a Best Supporting Actress nomination for it. So did Adriana Barraza, who plays Amelia, the housekeeper. Both nominations are deserved, and both point at the same thing: Babel is at its best when it stays close to one person.
Amelia and the Mexico Crossing
Barraza’s Amelia gets the film’s most contained and most devastating stretch. She takes Mike and Debbie Jones, played by Nathan Gamble and Elle Fanning, to a wedding across the Mexican border. Gael García Bernal plays Santiago. What follows is a border crossing that turns on panic rather than malice.
The extras portraying migrants in the Mexico shoot were real immigrants hired by the production company. That detail is not trivia. It is the reason those scenes carry a weight the film’s more schematic passages lack. The camera is not looking at types. It is looking at people who have done this before.
Satoshi Nikaido appears as Kenji Mamiya, and Mohamed Akhzam as Anwar. Said Tarchani plays Ahmed, Boubker Ait El Caid plays Yussef, and Yuko Murata plays Mitsu. The ensemble is enormous and mostly excellent. The problem is not the cast. It is what the script asks the cast to carry.
What the Interlocking Structure Costs
Babel was selected to compete for the Palme d’Or at the 2006 Cannes Film Festival, where Iñárritu won the Best Director Award. It screened later at the Toronto International Film Festival. It opened in selected American cities on 27 October 2006 and went wide on 10 November 2006.
The reviews were positive and the film made money, grossing $135 million worldwide. It won the Golden Globe for Best Motion Picture – Drama. It took seven Academy Award nominations, including Best Picture, Best Director, and the two supporting actress slots. It won Best Original Score for Gustavo Santaolalla.
“If you want to be understood… listen.”
That tagline is the thesis, and it is also the trap. Babel announces its meaning before it earns it. Every storyline is built to demonstrate the same lesson about miscommunication, and by the fourth or fifth time the film makes that point, the audience has long since gotten it.
Where the Film Actually Lands
The Morocco thread is the weakest. It sets the plot in motion and then mostly waits to be relevant again. The Japan thread is the strongest and could have been a feature on its own. The Mexico thread sits between them, saved by Barraza and by the real immigrants in the frame.
What holds the whole thing together is Santaolalla’s score and the sheer nerve of the editing. What pulls it apart is the insistence that four stories must rhyme. They do not rhyme so much as echo, and an echo is a thinner thing than a chord.
Iñárritu and Arriaga are skilled at dread. They are less skilled at restraint. Babel runs 143 minutes and feels every one of them in its middle stretch, where the cross-cutting starts to function as a delay rather than a build.
The Case for Babel Anyway
None of that makes Babel a failure. It is an ambitious film that mostly delivers on its ambition, and its best scenes are better than anything in most of its contemporaries. Kikuchi alone justifies the ticket.
The film also caught something real about the mid-2000s: the sense that distant lives are wired together whether anyone wants them to be. That idea has only gotten more familiar since. Babel did not invent it, but it dramatized it with unusual scale.
Where it stumbles is in treating interconnection as a thesis rather than a condition. The movie keeps telling us these people are linked. It rarely trusts us to feel it without the machinery grinding in the background.
The Verdict on Babel
Babel is a good film with a great one buried inside it. The Tokyo storyline is the buried greatness. The Morocco and Mexico threads are strong enough to carry their weight, and the cast across all four stories is doing serious work.
What keeps it from the top tier is the structure itself. A puzzle box can be thrilling, but it can also become a cage, and Babel spends its final act rattling the bars. The film wants to be about the failure to listen. Too often, it is also a film that will not stop talking.
The score reflects that split. Babel earns its place in the Death Trilogy, and it earns its awards, but it does not quite earn its own grandiosity.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
