Lawmakers have put a new federal film and TV incentive on the table, and it comes with a target: 20%. The Motion Picture, Television, and Entertainment Revitalization Act, introduced Thursday by a bipartisan group, would create a 20% tax credit for qualifying productions, plus an extra 5% boost for those working in opportunity zones or federally declared rural disaster areas.
The bill is being pushed by Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) and Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA) in the Senate, and Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA), Rep. Brian Jack (R-GA), Rep. Nathaniel Moran (R-TX), and Rep. Laura Friedman (D-CA) in the House. It is a familiar pitch for Hollywood advocates, but it now has a powerful ally in the White House.
The Credit And Its Limits
Producers would need to meet a few conditions to claim the credit. The production must have a total cost exceeding $1 million, and 75% of the work must happen in the United States. Post-production and visual effects count toward the total, but the bill excludes news, live sports, talk shows, daytime dramas, social media content, advertising, and corporate videos from the definition of production.
Credits can be transferred to another taxpayer, which is a notable feature for investors who want to buy into a production without taking on the creative risk themselves. The bill also includes sweeteners for productions across 10 or more states, independent productions, and those increasing domestic production relative to a historical foreign base amount.
The idea is simple: make the U.S. a more attractive place to shoot a movie or a TV show by lowering the tax burden on the people doing the work. The bill’s supporters say the credit will help American incentives compete with those offered in other countries.
Schiff’s Case For The Credit
Schiff made the argument directly on a call with reporters. “So much of the film industry, in particular, have moved overseas because the United States has simply not been willing or able to match the tax incentives,” he said. He noted that “States have tried, and California has certainly tried, but can’t on its own make up for the very substantial incentives overseas.”
The senator’s framing is telling. He is not arguing that the U.S. offers no incentives at all; he is saying that the patchwork of state programs, particularly in California, cannot match the scale of what other countries offer. A federal credit would smooth out those differences and give American productions a more level playing field.
The bill’s backers have been pushing for this kind of incentive for years. Their prospects gained new momentum late last month when President Donald Trump endorsed the legislation.
What The Bill Actually Changes
The 5% uplift for opportunity zones and rural disaster areas is a targeted approach. It rewards productions that choose to work in economically distressed areas, which could bring jobs to regions that otherwise see little film activity.
The sweeteners for cross-state productions and independent work are aimed at different corners of the industry.
The Political Odds
The bill has a clear target window. Schiff said the goal is to pass the legislation during the lame duck session at the end of the year, perhaps by attaching it to a major funding bill. That timing puts the measure in a narrow window between the midterms and the start of the next Congress.
The House is currently in recess through the midterms, which limits the ability of representatives to move the bill forward. The Senate is about to adjourn soon, which adds pressure to get a vote before lawmakers leave town.
The bipartisan sponsorship helps, but the politics of tax incentives are never simple.
What Comes Next
The bill is a serious attempt to change how the U.S. competes for film and TV production. It brings together a broad coalition of lawmakers, a presidential endorsement, and a clear target: 20%.
Whether it becomes law depends on the next few months. The lame duck session is the window, and the window is closing fast.
For now, the bill is on the table, and the industry is waiting to see what happens next.
Key Facts Box
– 20% federal film and TV incentive
– Additional 5% uplift for opportunity zones or rural disaster areas
– Minimum cost: $1 million
– Productions must have 75% of work in the U.S.
– Excluded: news, live sports, talk shows, daytime dramas, social media content, advertising, corporate videos
– Credits transferable to another taxpayer
– Introduced Thursday by bipartisan group of lawmakers
Bill Co-Sponsors
– Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC)
– Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA)
– Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA)
– Rep. Brian Jack (R-GA)
– Rep. Nathaniel Moran (R-TX)
– Rep. Laura Friedman (D-CA)
Where the paper stands
The paper backs none of this bill’s incentives and is against any rule that hands the market to the incumbents; it backs narrow rules against direct harm instead. Federal film incentives are a backdoor subsidy to the largest studios, and they always land there.
The bill’s sponsors are betting that the next few months will seal the deal, attaching it to a major funding bill during the lame duck session. That is a high-risk bet for the industry, since the bill’s passage depends entirely on the whims of the next Congress. But the odds are long.
What the reader should watch for is whether the bill actually opens doors for independent producers or merely greases the wheels for the biggest studios. The paper will be watching closely.
See the video the story is built around at Deadline.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.