A young researcher posted a warning on X in early September about the big AI labs racing toward superintelligence. The thread drew more than 100 million views in about a day. Within a week, Anthropic’s chief executive called for slowing the pace of AI progress. The heads of OpenAI and xAI voiced support. On Sept. 14, the main index of chip stocks fell 5.9% in a single session.
The Warning That Started It
The researcher, 27 years old, wrote that the major AI labs were “racing straight to self improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.” His posts drew huge attention fast. The thread’s reach was enormous, and it set off a chain reaction across the industry.
Anthropic’s Chief Executive Responds
Anthropic’s chief executive responded quickly to the warning. He called for slowing the pace of AI progress. The move came within the week after the posts went viral.
OpenAI and xAI Follow
The heads of OpenAI and xAI joined the call. Both companies voiced support for the push to slow down.
The Chip Stock Drop
On Sept. 14, the main index of chip stocks fell 5.9% in a single session. The timing was notable, though the source does not establish a direct link between the call and the drop.
What Changed
The technology itself did not change. The mood did.
The Business Model Behind It
The warning created a panic. That panic drove a response from the labs, which in turn drove a market reaction.
Who Profits From Fear
The people who profit are the ones selling fear. They benefit from the mood, not from the technology itself.
The Cost of Panic
The stock market reacts to mood as much as it reacts to fundamentals. A drop of 5.9% in a single session shows how quickly a shift in public feeling can move money.
Where the paper stands
The paper backs the researcher’s warning about the direction of the AI labs themselves, and is against the industry leaders’ call to slow down the pace of AI development, which would likely entrench the very giants the paper warns against. The warning itself was a cry against the labs racing toward superintelligence without regard for human risk; the response from Anthropic’s chief executive and the support from OpenAI and xAI turned that warning into a demand to freeze the pace of progress. That demand is the problem, not the warning.
The paper’s concern is that slowing down the pace of AI development hands the market to the incumbents. Licensing regimes and compliance costs only giants can afford are a moat, not a safeguard. The researchers who raise alarms deserve an audience, but the companies that respond by asking for slower development are asking for permission to keep their dominant position. The paper would rather see narrow rules against direct harm, such as forcing companies to disclose safety failures they hid, than broad rules that lock out whoever would have challenged the giants.
Readers should watch for the labs’ next moves. When the biggest firms ask to be regulated, the paper asks who those rules would lock out.
Key Facts Box
- A 27-year-old researcher posted a warning on X in early September
- The thread drew more than 100 million views in about a day
- Anthropic’s chief executive called for slowing the pace of AI progress within a week
- OpenAI and xAI heads voiced support for the call to slow down
- The main chip stock index fell 5.9% on Sept. 14 in a single session
The warning created a panic. The panic drove a response. The response moved markets.
See the a run of 14 images at the Washington Examiner.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.