WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
About
CLAY TRIBUNE.
ShopCartAccount
Advertisement

Cars 2 Review: Slick, Occasionally Funny, Utterly Forgettable

A tale of a racing car's journey across the globe, chasing fame and fortune, yet failing to rival its predecessor's charm.

By mitch·4 min read
A racing car races through a bright city street at night.

Lightning McQueen has won the Piston Cup. He should be celebrating. Instead he is chasing a bigger prize: a global race that promises fame and fortune beyond Radiator Springs. That is the premise of Cars 2, the 2011 sequel to Pixar’s beloved original, and it is a premise that asks viewers to forget what made the first movie special. The result is a film that is slick, occasionally funny, and utterly forgettable.

Trailer, via Pixar.

Mater’s New Role

The plot follows Lightning McQueen as he joins a worldwide racing tour with his friend Mater. The tour is sponsored by a mysterious oil company, and the film spends much of its runtime chasing a conspiracy involving alternative fuel sources. It is a thin premise, and it shows. The central mystery is resolved quickly, leaving the back half of the film to meander through set pieces rather than character beats.

Advertisement

The biggest change is Mater. In the first Cars, he was a comic sidekick with a Southern drawl and a knack for getting into trouble. Here he takes center stage, becoming a secret agent who speaks in rhyming couplets and fights villains with martial arts moves. The transformation is jarring. It is also the film’s most committed stroke, and it mostly fails to land.

A Global Tour

The film’s biggest strength is its locations. Tokyo, London, and Turin are rendered with Pixar’s signature polish, and the cityscapes are genuinely striking. A chase through the streets of Tokyo is the best sequence in the film, full of energy and clever sight gags. But the settings are not enough to carry the story.

The supporting cast is a mixed bag. Francesco Bernoulli, a European racer, is a stiff foil for Lightning McQueen. Finn McMissile, a British agent voiced by Michael John Caine, is fun but underwritten. Holley Shiftwell, a young agent voiced by Emily Blunt, is the closest thing the film has to a breakout performance. She gets the film’s best lines, even if they are delivered to a car that is not quite ready for them.

Where It Falls Short

The pacing drags in the middle stretch. The conspiracy plot is resolved far too early, leaving the final act to fill space with action sequences that feel like filler. The emotional stakes are lower than in the first film, and the payoff is smaller. Lightning McQueen does not grow. He simply drives faster.

The film also leans heavily on product placement, with cars promoting real brands appearing throughout. This is a step down from the first film, which was subtle about its commercial ties. It feels less like a story and more like a commercial for a toy line.

The Numbers

Element First Cars Cars 2
Main Character Lightning McQueen Lightning McQueen
Setting Small town Worldwide tour
Tone Heartfelt comedy Spy thriller
Critical Reception Positive Mixed

The table makes the comparison stark. The first film was a quiet road trip about friendship. This one is a noisy globe-trotting adventure about fame. The shift is not necessarily bad, but it is a different animal entirely.

What Works

The film is at its best when it stops trying to be a spy movie and lets the characters breathe. A scene where Mater tries to fit in at a British tea shop is genuinely funny, and it shows what the filmmakers could do with a simple idea. These moments are few and far between, but they are memorable.

The voice acting is solid across the board. Owen Wilson returns as Lightning McQueen, and he delivers the same deadpan charm that worked in the first film. John C. Reilly voices Mater, and he commits fully to the spy bit, even when the material does not support it.

The Verdict

Cars 2 is not a failure. It is a film that is competent, well-made, and ultimately unremarkable. It looks great, it has some laughs, and it respects its audience enough to avoid being truly bad. But it lacks the spark that made the first film special. It is a sequel that plays it safe, and safety is not what Pixar’s best work is built on.

The film is best enjoyed as a pleasant diversion rather than a destination. It is not the kind of movie that demands a second viewing. It is the kind of movie that fills time between better films.

Cars 2 is a middling entry in a franchise with a high bar. It is not a disaster, but it is not a triumph either. It is a film that understands its own limits and stays within them. That is a modest ambition, and it is reflected in the final product.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.