Coinbase has filed with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to bring single-stock perpetual futures to US customers, a move that would put the company on par with traditional Wall Street exchanges in how it handles stock trading.
The San Francisco-based cryptocurrency platform announced Wednesday that it has filed a registration statement with the CFTC to offer the products. The filing covers roughly 50 to 60 stocks, including Apple, Microsoft, Tesla and Nvidia. The company said it expects to launch the service for eligible customers later this year.
The move follows a separate regulatory step from Coinbase Derivatives, which filed a Form 1-N with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Sept. 1 to register as a national securities exchange for security futures. Coinbase has not said when the exchange might become operational.
What Perpetual Futures Are
Perpetual futures are financial contracts that allow traders to speculate on the price of an asset without needing to hold the underlying asset itself. Unlike traditional futures contracts, which expire on a set date, perpetual futures have no expiration date and can be held indefinitely.
They work by using a funding rate, which is a mechanism that balances the positions of buyers and sellers. Traders who hold a long position pay a funding fee to traders who hold a short position, or vice versa, depending on which side of the contract is more crowded.
For retail investors, the appeal is simple: they gain exposure to individual stocks without having to buy the shares outright. For Coinbase, the move expands its product lineup beyond spot trading and derivatives tied to digital assets.
The Apple-Microsoft-Tesla Spread
The initial basket of stocks includes some of the world’s largest companies by market capitalization. Apple and Microsoft are the world’s two most valuable publicly traded companies, while Tesla is a leading electric vehicle manufacturer and Nvidia leads the AI hardware sector.
Nvidia has been a particular focus for investors betting on artificial intelligence, with its stock rising sharply as demand for AI accelerators has surged. The inclusion of Nvidia in the initial offering suggests Coinbase is targeting traders interested in the technology sector.
The filing also includes Tesla, which has been a controversial holding for some institutional investors due to its volatile share price. The mix of technology, automotive and consumer electronics companies gives the offering a broad appeal across sectors.
The CFTC Path
The CFTC filing means Coinbase is seeking approval to operate as a swap execution facility, which is a regulated marketplace for swaps and other derivatives. Swap execution facilities are subject to oversight by the CFTC, which regulates derivatives markets.
The SEC Exchange
The Sept. 1 filing from Coinbase Derivatives is a separate regulatory step. By registering as a national securities exchange for security futures, Coinbase Derivatives is seeking to operate under SEC oversight for those products.
Security futures are a type of derivative that references a security, such as a stock or bond. They are treated differently from commodity futures under US law, which is why the SEC is involved in this particular registration.
The dual regulatory path means Coinbase is splitting its derivatives operations between two federal agencies. The CFTC handles the swap execution facility, while the SEC oversees the exchange registration.
| Regulatory Body | Product Scope |
|---|---|
| CFTC | Swap execution facility |
| SEC | National securities exchange |
The International Predecessor
Coinbase already offers stock perpetual futures to eligible traders outside the US. The products launched in March with contracts tracking major US stocks and indexes, including Apple and Nvidia.
At launch, the company said the products were unavailable to US persons but that it was working to expand the offering to additional regions. The new filing is the next step in that expansion.
The international launch gave Coinbase a working model for how the products perform in practice. The company has had time to see how traders use the contracts and how the funding mechanism holds up under real-world conditions.
The Timing Question
Coinbase said it expects to launch the service for eligible customers later this year. The company has not given a specific date, and the timing could depend on regulatory approvals from both the CFTC and the SEC.
The company has been through this process before. Its CLARITY platform, which allows users to trade derivatives on US equities, was approved by the CFTC in June 2024. That approval came after a lengthy review process, and Coinbase has since operated the platform under CFTC oversight.
What Traders Get
The filing does not change the mechanics of perpetual futures themselves, but it does change where they are traded. A CFTC-regulated swap execution facility operates differently from a traditional stock exchange, and the distinction matters for traders who want to know how their orders are matched and settled.
Traders should also consider the funding rate. Because perpetual futures do not expire, the funding mechanism runs continuously, which means traders who hold positions overnight pay or receive funding based on the state of the market.
The funding rate can add costs for long-term holders and create opportunities for short-term traders. It is a feature of perpetual futures, but it is one that traders need to understand before they commit capital.
The Bottom Line
Coinbase’s filing is a significant step for the company. It brings its derivatives operations under formal regulatory oversight, and it opens a new product category to US customers.
The company has already shown it can operate these contracts internationally. Now it is seeking to do the same domestically.
Whether the launch happens later this year depends on the regulators. If both the CFTC and the SEC approve the filings, the service could be available to US traders soon.
The dual regulatory path is unusual, but it reflects the current state of US financial regulation. The CFTC handles derivatives, and the SEC handles exchanges. Coinbase is simply operating where both agencies have jurisdiction.
For traders, the practical question is whether the products meet their needs. Perpetual futures offer exposure to individual stocks without buying shares, and the funding mechanism adds a layer of complexity that traders should understand before they trade.
Coinbase has said it is working to expand the offering to additional regions, and the US market is the next frontier. Whether the launch happens later this year depends on the regulators. If both the CFTC and the SEC approve the filings, the service could be available to US traders soon.
The company’s international launch showed how the products work in practice, and the US filing is the next step in that journey. The dual regulatory path is unusual, but it reflects the current state of US financial regulation. The CFTC handles derivatives, and the SEC handles exchanges. Coinbase is simply operating where both agencies have jurisdiction.
The funding mechanism is a feature, not a bug, and traders should understand it before they trade. The US market is the next frontier for Coinbase’s derivatives business, and the company has already shown it can operate these contracts internationally. Whether the launch happens later this year depends on the regulators. If both the CFTC and the SEC approve the filings, the service could be available to US traders soon.
Where the paper stands
The paper backs Coinbase bringing single-stock perpetual futures to US customers, and is against any regulation that would turn the CFTC filing into a moat locking out smaller competitors. The filing is a natural step for a platform that already offers these products internationally, and the company’s CLARITY platform precedent shows it can handle CFTC oversight.
The danger here is not the technology itself. The danger is that the CFTC’s existing regime for swap execution facilities could become a moat, making it too costly for smaller platforms to enter this market. Licensing regimes and compliance costs only giants can afford are a moat, not a safeguard.
The paper opposes broad rules that hand the market to the incumbents. Narrow rules against direct harm — forcing companies to disclose safety failures they hid — are acceptable. Pauses, slowdowns and federal licensing of AI freeze today’s leaders in place and lock out whoever would have challenged them.
See the a run of 18 images at Cointelegraph.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.