Eighteen Years On, ‘Yes Man’ Still Works Because Jim Carrey Learned to Say Yes

Carl Fredricksen is not the main character of “Up.” That honor belongs to Buddy, the talking bird who shows up in the opening minutes and then disappears entirely. The film spends its runtime following Carl, a retired widower who ties thousands of balloons to his house and floats away from his old life. What follows is a road trip, a love story, and a lesson about letting go — none of it delivered with much grace.

“Up” is a Pixar film, and Pixar films are supposed to be joyful. This one is mostly sad. It opens with a montage of Carl and his wife Ellie, showing their entire life together: the marriage, the house, the dog, the arguments, the quiet evenings. Then Ellie dies, and the film spends the next twenty minutes letting you sit with that loss before it moves on. It is a powerful opening, and it earns its place. But the film never quite recovers from it.

Trailer, via YouTube Movies.

Carl and the Balloons

Carl’s plan is simple. He wants to leave the neighborhood, the memories, the house that holds everything he loved and lost. He ties thousands of helium balloons to his roof and floats away, carrying the house with him. The image is beautiful. The execution is less so. The film treats the house as a character, and it works for a while — you feel Carl’s attachment to the place, the way it holds his history. But the joke wears thin quickly. A floating house is a funny premise. A floating house that becomes a central plot device is a crutch.

The journey itself is where the film finds its footing. Carl meets Russell, a young boy who stows away on the adventure, and the two form a bond across generations. Russell is annoying, loud, and selfish — the kind of child you want to shake. But the film commits to making him likable, and eventually you do warm to him. Their partnership drives the middle section, and it is the best part of the movie.

Dug the Dog

Dug is a golden retriever who speaks in a British accent. He is the sidekick, the comic relief, and the heart of the film. His scenes are the ones that land. He is funny, clever, and genuinely affectionate. The film spends a lot of time with Dug, and it is easy to see why — he is a standout performer. He is also the most consistent. The film trusts him to carry scenes, and he does.

The villain of “Up” is a man named Charles Muntz, voiced by Christopher Plummer. He is obsessed with exploration and discovery, and he will stop at nothing to get what he wants. The film sets him up as a threat, and he delivers on that threat in a way that feels earned. His final confrontation with Carl is tense, and the film handles it with a mix of restraint and spectacle. It is the clearest example of the movie working when it stops trying to be cute.

The End of the Road

The film’s ending is a mixed bag. It resolves the central conflict, but it does so in a way that feels rushed. The final act introduces a new character, a young girl named Kevin, who becomes Russell’s crush. The pairing works, but the film does not give it enough room to breathe. It is a happy ending, but it feels like a pat one.

The film also includes a sequence set in Paradise Falls, a remote mountain peak that serves as the destination for Carl’s journey. The visuals are stunning — the falls, the mist, the distant horizon. But the sequence is mostly a backdrop for the characters. It is beautiful to look at, but it does not add much to the story.

A Film of Two Halves

“Up” is a film of two halves. The first half is a tragedy, and it is a good one. The second half is a comedy, and it is a weaker one. The film struggles to reconcile the two moods. It wants to be both serious and silly, and it cannot hold both at once. The result is a film that is often tonally inconsistent.

The animation is excellent. The character design is expressive, and the movement is fluid. The world of “Up” is rich with detail, from the streets of the neighborhood to the jungles of Paradise Falls. It is a technical achievement, and it deserves praise.

But technical achievement is not the same as storytelling. The film is not a failure. It is a disappointment. It is a Pixar film, and Pixar films are supposed to be better than this.

The film runs 96 minutes, and it feels longer. The pacing is uneven, and the film does not know when to hold back and when to push forward.

“Up” is a film about grief, about aging, about finding purpose late in life. It is also a film about a floating house and a talking dog. It is a film about a man who cannot let go of the past and a boy who cannot understand the future. It is a film about a bird named Buddy who shows up and then disappears. It is a film that tries to say something meaningful and says it through a talking dog.

It is a film that is worth seeing. It is a film that is not worth praising. It is a film that gets better with age, but it will never be great.

animation · Christopher Plummer · movie review · Pixar · review