ROBLOX. VIDEO GAMES. MOVIES. ORIGINAL ANIMATIONS.
CLAY TRIBUNE.
Advertisement

Lone Scherfig’s One Day Turns 15, Still Can’t Decide If It’s a Romance or a Time-Lapse

A review of One Day (2011), starring Anne Hathaway and Jim Sturgess, directed by Lone Scherfig from David Nicholls' novel about two people across twenty years.

By mitch·4 min read
A young man and woman stand together on a graduation lawn as the sun sets behind them.

The tagline for One Day promises “Twenty years. Two people.” What the film delivers is 107 minutes of two people who mostly should not be in the same room, and a structure that keeps insisting they should.

Lone Scherfig directs from David Nicholls’ screenplay, adapted from his own 2009 novel. Anne Hathaway plays Emma Morley and Jim Sturgess plays Dexter Mayhew. They meet on 15 July 1988, the eve of their graduation from the University of Edinburgh, and spend a platonic night together agreeing to “just be friends.” The film then checks in on them every 15 July for 20 years.

Trailer, via Universal Pictures UK.

Advertisement

St. Swithin’s Day, Every Year

The mechanic is the whole movie, so here is the running order as the plot lays it out:

Date Dexter Emma
15 July 1988 Graduation, Edinburgh Graduation, Edinburgh
15 July 1989 Leaves for India Moves to London to write
15 July 1990 Teaching English in Paris Waiting tables, meets Ian
15 July 1991 Suggests a holiday Still in London
15 July 1992 Dinard Turns down his advances
15 July 1993 Hosting a late-night show —
15 July 1994 Drunk at his parents’ First date with Ian
15 July 1995 “The most annoying man on telly” Schoolteacher, living with Ian
15 July 1996 Cocaine, insults, dinner Walks out

That table is not a simplification. It is close to the experience of watching the film.

A Gimmick That Keeps Its Distance

The annual check-in is a clever idea for a book, where a chapter can carry a year’s worth of interior life. On screen it works against the two actors. We get one day, then a jump, then another day. Whatever happened in between — the jobs, the relationships, the decisions that made these people who they are — is skipped. The audience is asked to feel 20 years of intimacy from a handful of scenes.

Hathaway and Sturgess are both capable, and neither is the problem. The problem is that Emma and Dexter are not interesting enough on any single 15 July to justify the wait for the next one. He is a wealthy, privately educated television presenter who gets high on cocaine and insults his best friend at dinner. She is a working-class would-be writer from the north of England who settles for a man she has no chemistry with.

Dexter, Emma, and the Shaw Line

The film’s ugliest scene arrives on 15 July 1996. Dexter, high on cocaine, flirts with another woman and quotes George Bernard Shaw at Emma: “Those who can, do; those who can’t, teach.” She storms off and tells him they have outgrown each other. She says she loves him but no longer likes him.

That should land. It is the one moment where the film’s central relationship is allowed to be genuinely bad rather than wistfully sad. But the movie has spent eight years telling us these two belong together, and it has not earned the reversal. The line reads as a plot beat, not a betrayal.

Patricia Clarkson and Ken Stott appear as Dexter’s parents, and Clarkson gets the film’s sharpest material. After Dexter arrives at his parents’ house still drunk, his mother — who has a terminal cancer diagnosis — tells him he is not yet a nice person. It is a real observation about a real character, delivered with no sentiment. The film could have used more of that.

What the Twenty Years Add Up To

One Day was released in the United States on 19 August 2011 by Focus Features and in the United Kingdom on 24 August 2011 by Universal Pictures. A Netflix series adaptation of the same novel, with Ambika Mod and Leo Woodall, arrived in 2024.

The comparison is not flattering to the film. A series has the room to let a year breathe. A 107-minute feature does not, and Scherfig’s version never solves that problem. It compresses the novel’s structure without finding a visual or dramatic equivalent for what the book did on the page.

There is a version of this story that works. Two people, one date, two decades — the premise is sound, and the casting is not the failure. The failure is that One Day keeps telling us time has passed instead of showing us what it cost. We are handed a table of years and asked to supply the feeling ourselves.

The film’s best scene is a mother telling her son the truth. The rest is a calendar with a love story stapled to it.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.