“Harry Potter 20th Anniversary: Return to Hogwarts” runs 103 minutes and asks viewers to sit through a reunion special built around interviews with the surviving cast and crew of the film series. It is a documentary, not a full-length feature, and it plays like one. The film covers the twenty-year history of the franchise, with new interviews and footage tied to the release of the first instalment, The Philosopher’s Stone. It also pays tribute to cast members who have died since the films ended.
Trailer, via HBO Max.
The Cast
The main trio — Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson — carry the weight of the film, joined by Helena Bonham Carter, Robbie Coltrane, Ralph Fiennes, Tom Felton, James Phelps, Oliver Phelps, Bonnie Wright, Matthew Lewis, and Evanna Lynch. The producers include David Heyman, and the directors behind the films — Chris Columbus, Alfonso Cuarón, Mike Newell, and David Yates — are also interviewed. The film is produced by Warner Bros. Unscripted Television, in association with Warner Horizon, and executive produced by Casey Patterson.
Coltrane’s death on 14 October 2022 after filming was announced in the material used for this review.
What the Film Covers
The film is built on new interviews with the cast and crew. It mixes those with clips from the films themselves, creating a running narrative of the series’ history. The film does not simply replay old footage. It ties that footage to the people who made it, giving viewers a sense of how the films were put together.
The tribute sections are where the film’s purpose becomes clearest. It pays tribute to Helen McCrory, Alan Rickman, John Hurt, Richard Griffiths, and Richard Harris. Those tributes are brief but effective, giving viewers a chance to remember performers who shaped the series.
The Tribute Sections
The tribute sections are brief, respectful, and well edited. The film treats these actors with dignity, showing scenes from their performances alongside interviews from the people who worked with them.
The Weak Parts
The middle stretch of the film is where it loses focus. Some segments feel padded, with interviews that repeat points already made earlier. The film is long for its subject, and some of that length comes from filler rather than substance.
The film also leans heavily on nostalgia. That is a fair approach for a reunion special, but it can also become repetitive. The film keeps returning to the same memories, and some viewers may find themselves wishing it moved faster.
How the Film Runs
| Section | Source Material |
|---|---|
| Introduction | Interviews with surviving cast and crew |
| Early films | Clips from the first instalment |
| Tribute sections | Scenes from the films |
| Middle interviews | Interviews with surviving cast and crew |
| Final interviews and wrap-up | Interviews with surviving cast and crew |
The film follows that rough shape across its runtime. It opens with introductions, moves through the early films, pays tribute, and then spends the rest of its time on interviews and closing remarks.
Our View
The film is a solid, if uneven, look back at one of the most successful film series of all time. It is well made, with strong editing and a clear structure. But it also suffers from repetition and padding in the middle, which keeps it from reaching greatness.
The tribute sections are effective. They honour performers who deserve remembering, and they do so without becoming maudlin. The interviews with the surviving cast and crew are also worthwhile, even when they repeat themselves.
The film is worth watching for anyone who loved the original series. It captures the feeling of being part of something bigger, and it does so without losing its humanity. But it is not a perfect film. It is too long in places, and it repeats itself too often.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
