ROBLOX. VIDEO GAMES. MOVIES. ORIGINAL ANIMATIONS.
CLAY TRIBUNE.
Advertisement

Bloodshot Review: A Dead Man Rebooted, and a Franchise That Never Had a Chance

Bloodshot review: Vin Diesel's nanite superhero movie, its memory-wipe plot, Guy Pearce's corporate villain, and a March 2020 release killed by COVID.

By mitch·8 min read
A man stands alone upon a wet street, his countenance marked by a strange and terrible light within.

Vin Diesel spends most of Bloodshot looking like a man who has been told the plot but not allowed to read it. That is the film’s central problem and its only real subject. Directed by David S. F. Wilson from a script by Jeff Wadlow and Eric Heisserer, Bloodshot runs 110 minutes and arrives as the first intended installment in a shared cinematic universe built from Valiant Comics characters.

It premiered at the Regency Village Theatre in Westwood on March 10, 2020, and opened in the United States on March 13 through Sony Pictures Releasing. By then the COVID-19 pandemic was already closing theaters worldwide. The film’s commercial life was over before it started. It grossed $37.3 million globally, and Sony pushed it to video on demand less than two weeks after its theatrical release. The tagline promises that being a superhero is in his blood. The movie never finds a reason to care.

Trailer, via Sony Pictures Entertainment.

Advertisement

Ray Garrison Wakes Up in Kuala Lumpur

The premise is a revenge engine with a memory leak. Ray Garrison is a U.S. Marine who leads a hostage rescue in Mombasa, then takes his wife Gina to an Italian beach town on the Amalfi Coast. Mercenaries led by Martin Ax kidnap them. Ax wants to know how the military learned the hostages’ location. Ray says he cannot answer. Ax kills Gina with an air compressor in front of him, Ray vows revenge, and Ax kills him too.

He wakes in the labs of Rising Spirit Technologies, a company in Kuala Lumpur that builds cybernetic enhancements for disabled U.S. military personnel. CEO and lead scientist Dr. Emil Harting tells him he is the first successful human subject of the Bloodshot program. Experimental nanites now replace his entire bloodstream. They boost his strength, heal his injuries, and keep him alive, but they must be replaced and recharged on a schedule or he will die again. Ray meets the other patients: former Navy diver KT, former Army Ranger Marcus Tibbs, and ex-Navy SEAL Jimmy Dalton.

Then the flashbacks start. Ray bolts from the facility, hacks RST’s servers, tracks Ax to Budapest, and kills him and his bodyguards. Back at the lab he is put to sleep while the nanites reboot. Harting wipes his memory and installs a new scenario, this time with his own former RST associate Nick Baris as the man who killed Gina. KT objects to the whole arrangement. Harting has done this many times, sending Ray after a fresh target each cycle without Ray ever knowing.

That is a genuinely nasty idea for a superhero movie. It is also the part Bloodshot handles worst.

The Nanites Are the Best Character

Give the film this much: the nanite mechanic is clean, legible and mean. Ray’s blood is a machine. It repairs him, but it is finite, and it is controlled by the people who put it there. He is not a hero with a curse. He is a product with a maintenance schedule. When Harting reboots him, the audience understands exactly what is being taken.

The action sequences earn their keep, and the visual effects sell the repair work. Bodies take damage and knit back together in ways that read as expensive and deliberate. The Budapest sequence gives the film its one stretch of real momentum. Wilson keeps the camera close and the cuts hard.

Being a superhero is in his blood.

That tagline is doing more work than the screenplay. It is a pun about nanites, and it is also the film’s only thesis: Ray is what he was made into, not what he chose. The movie states this and then never returns to it with any force.

Vin Diesel Plays a Man With No Interior

Ray Garrison has no memories for most of the runtime, and Diesel plays that as vacancy rather than loss. There is no flicker of the husband underneath. When Gina appears in flashbacks, she is a photograph with a name. Talulah Riley has almost nothing to do as Gina Garrison except die twice in two different versions of the same night.

Diesel’s best moments are physical. He is convincing when the nanites are working and he is being shot at. He is not convincing when the script asks him to feel something about a woman the film has not bothered to establish. The performance is a shrug in a tank top.

The supporting cast is stranded. Guy Pearce plays Harting as a corporate executive with a lab coat, all entitlement and no menace. Eiza González gets the film’s only arc worth following as KT, the patient who understands what is being done to Ray and says so. Sam Heughan’s Jimmy Dalton is a rival with a grudge and not much else. Toby Kebbell’s Ax is a thug who exists to be killed in the first act. Lamorne Morris arrives late as Wilfred Wigans, and the film briefly remembers it could be fun.

Guy Pearce Runs a Company That Owns Its Hero

The conspiracy is where Bloodshot should live, and it keeps stepping around the interesting rooms. Harting is not a villain in the usual comic-book sense. He runs a company that contracts with the U.S. military, and he has found a way to point a dead soldier at whatever target he likes. The film has the pieces of a story about defense contracting, memory, and disposable people.

It does not build that story. Instead it stages a series of escapes and returns, each one resetting Ray to the same blank state. The repetition is the point, but the film treats it as a plot twist rather than a horror. KT is the only character who reacts to it like a person. Her objection to Harting’s manipulation is the closest the movie comes to a moral position.

The Valiant Comics connection is mostly theoretical here. Bloodshot was built to launch a shared universe, and the seams show. The film spends energy on setup it never pays off. Ken Watanabe was meant to appear in a post-credits scene as the Harbinger villain Toyo Harada. Valiant CEO and Chief Creative Officer Shamdasani told Inverse that a change of copyright made the cameo impossible to film. The universe starts with one movie and a hole where its hook should be.

The Casting Story Explains a Lot

The film’s production history reads like a warning. Jared Leto was in early negotiations for the lead in July 2017. Vin Diesel was announced in March 2018. By May, Sam Heughan, Michael Sheen and Eiza González had joined. Talulah Riley and Alex Hernandez came aboard in June as Gina and Tibbs. Toby Kebbell and Jóhannes Haukur Jóhannesson were cast as villains, with Kebbell playing Ax. Lamorne Morris was hired in August as Wilfred Wigans. That same month, Guy Pearce entered talks to replace Sheen, who left over scheduling and family conflicts.

Sheen out, Pearce in. That is not a scandal. It is a movie that kept changing shape on the way to the screen. The finished film has the feel of several versions stacked on top of each other. The plot is over-explained in places and missing in others. Characters arrive with backstories the movie never uses. Alex Hernandez’s Tibbs, Siddharth Dhananjay’s Eric, Jóhannes Haukur Jóhannesson’s Nick Baris, and Tamer Burjaq’s Mombasa Gunman all pass through without leaving a mark.

A March 2020 Release That Never Had a Chance

The timing was brutal and it matters to any honest accounting of Bloodshot. The film opened on March 13, 2020, the same weekend pandemic restrictions began closing theaters around the world. Sony moved it to video on demand in under two weeks. A $37.3 million worldwide gross is not a verdict on the movie’s quality. It is a verdict on the calendar.

But the theatrical collapse does not explain the reviews. Critics were generally negative, singling out Diesel’s performance while giving credit to the action and the visual effects. That split is the correct read. The set pieces work. The man at the center of them does not.

What Bloodshot Gets Right and What It Wastes

Here is the honest ledger. The nanite premise is strong. The action is competent. KT is a real character in a film that does not deserve her. The central idea — a dead man rebooted and aimed at a new target every few weeks, never knowing he is being used — is better than most superhero movies bother to attempt.

Everything around that idea is thin. Ray’s grief is asserted, not dramatized. Harting’s scheme is explained in dialogue rather than felt. The film keeps cutting away from the horror of what is happening to its own protagonist, as if afraid the audience might notice. A movie about a man whose memories are edited should make the audience feel the edits. Bloodshot just tells you they happened and moves to the next fight.

The result is a film that is never boring and never good. It has a mechanic, a cast, and a release date that history will remember for reasons that have nothing to do with the movie. The Valiant universe it was supposed to launch never arrived. What remains is a 110-minute proof of concept for a franchise that the world shut down before it could start.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.